Random flat bundles and equidistribution

2025-04-29 0 0 438.14KB 30 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
arXiv:2210.09547v2 [math.NT] 3 Dec 2023
RANDOM FLAT BUNDLES AND EQUIDISTRIBUTION
MASOUD ZARGAR
Abstract. Each signature λ(n) = (λ1(n),...,λn(n)), where λ1(n) · · · λn(n) are integers, gives an irreducible
representation πλ(n):U(n)GL(Vλ(n)) of the unitary group U(n). Suppose Xis a finite-area cusped hyperbolic
surface, χis a random surface representation in Hom(π1(X), U(n)) equipped with a Haar unitary probability
measure, and (λ(n))
n=1 is a sequence of signatures. Let |λ(n)|:= Pi|λi(n)|. We show that there is an absolute
constant c > 0 such that if 0 6=|λ(n)| ≤ clog n
log log nfor sufficiently large n, then the Laplacians ∆χ,λ(n)acting on
sections of the flat unitary bundles associated to the surface representations
π1(X)χ
U(n)
πλ(n)
GL(Vλ(n))
have the property that for every ε > 0
Pχ: inf Spec(∆χ,λ(n))1
4εn→∞
1,
where Spec(∆χ,λ(n)) is the spectrum of χ(n). A special case of this is that flat unitary bundles associated to
χ:π1(X)U(n) asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞ have least eigenvalue at least 1
4ε, irrespective of the
spectral gap of Xitself. This is proved using the Hide–Magee method [HM21]. The general spectral theorem above
leads to a probabilistic equidistribution theorem for the images of closed geodesics under surface representations χ.
Using the spectral theorem above and proving a probabilistic prime geodesic theorem, we also obtain a probabilistic
equidistribution theorem for the images under χof geodesics of lengths dependent on the rank n.
1. Introduction 1
2. Preliminaries 5
3. Minimal eigenvalues of flat unitary bundles 9
4. Random matrix theory estimates 14
5. Counting eigenvalues 16
6. Probabilistic prime geodesic theorem 18
7. Applications of the spectral theorem 25
8. Comments on the balanced case 26
References 29
1. Introduction
A topic of great interest in mathematics, physics, and computer science is the study of spectral gaps of graphs and
Riemannian manifolds. Those finite simple d-regular graphs whose eigenvalues different from ±dare bounded in
absolute value from above by 2d1 are known as Ramanujan graphs. Infinite families of d-regular Ramanujan
graphs are known to exist. For prime powers d1, they have been explicitly constructed by Margulis [Mar88],
Lubotzky–Phillips–Sarnak [LPS88], and Morgenstern [Mor94] using number-theoretic methods. For other values of
d, using probabilistic methods combined with interlacing polynomials, Marcus–Spielman–Srivastava [MSS18] have
proved the existence of infinite families of d-regular Ramanujan graphs.
2d1 is the spectral radius of the universal covering tree of a d-regular graph. For hyperbolic surfaces, their
universal cover Hplays an analogous role, with its Laplacian having least eigenvalue 1
4as the analogue of 2d1
for graphs. As of the writing of this paper, it is not known if infinite families of closed connected hyperbolic surfaces
with enlarging genus exist each of whose Laplace-Beltrami operators have least positive eigenvalue, i.e. spectral gap,
at least 1
4. However, a recent result of Hide–Magee [HM21] shows that infinite families of closed connected hyperbolic
surfaces with enlarging genera exist with spectral gaps converging to 1
4. Their proof is probabilistic and, in contrast to
graphs, no constructive proof is known as of the writing of this paper—even for this near-optimal spectral gap result.
The theorem proved by Hide–Magee [HM21] should be compared to a conjecture and theorem of Friedman [Fri03]
stating that random covers of any fixed graph are almost Ramanujan with high probability. Recently, a new simpler
proof of Friedman’s conjecture was given Bordenave–Collins [BC19] using new methods. On the other hand, one of
the central conjectures in number theory, Selberg’s conjecture, states the following.
1
2 MASOUD ZARGAR
Conjecture 1.1 (Selberg’s conjecture).Arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces have spectral gaps λ1at least 1
4.
It is known that Conjecture 1.1 implies that there should be an infinite sequence of connected closed hyperbolic
surfaces with increasing genera each of which has a spectral gap of at least 1
4. However, Selberg’s conjecture 1.1
is beyond the reach of current methods. The best known spectral gap for arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces is due to
Kim–Sarnak [Kim03]:
λ11
47
64 2
.
Spectral gaps are closely related to equidistribution results, for example by the prime geodesic theorem. A goal of this
paper is the proof of a probabilistic equidistribution theorem for images of geodesics on cusped hyperbolic surfaces
under unitary surface representations. This is intimately connected to the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian acting
on sections of families of flat unitary bundles on such surfaces.
Our setup is as follows. Suppose Xis a non-compact, complete, connected, finite area hyperbolic surface.
Henceforth, we simply refer to such surfaces as cusped hyperbolic surfaces.
We consider surface representations χ:π1(X)U(n) into the unitary group. Since Xis a non-compact surface,
π1(X) is a free group, and so the space Hom(π1(X), U (n)) of surface representations may be identified with a
product of copies of U(n), one copy for each generator of π1(X). Therefore, we naturally endow Hom(π1(X), U(n))
with a Haar unitary probability measure. Every sequence of signatures λ(n) = (λ1(n),...,λn(n)), nvarying, where
λ1(n)...λn(n) are integers, gives an infinite family of irreducible unitary representations
πλ(n):U(n)GL(Vλ(n)).
For each sequence of signatures λ(n), we have an infinite family of normalized characters
χλ(n)() := tr(πλ(n)())
dim Vλ(n)
.
The surface representation
π1(X)χ
U(n)πλ(n)
GL(Vλ(n))
gives rise to a flat unitary vector bundle Eχ,λ(n)over Xof rank dim Vλ(n). The Laplacian ∆χ,λ(n)acts on sections
of Eχ,λ(n), whose smallest eigenvalue we want to study. We denote by Spec(∆χ,λ(n)) the spectrum of ∆χ,λ(n).
In this paper, we abuse language and speak of the eigenvalues of surface representations to mean the eigenvalues
of the Laplacian acting on sections of the associated flat bundles. Our first theorem is the following analogue
of [HM21] concerning minimal eigenvalues for flat unitary vector bundles whose proof follows ideas of [HM21] with
the appropriate generalizations and modifications to the case of irreducible representations of the unitary groups. It
serves as a lemma in the proof of the equidistribution Theorem 1.7 below.
Theorem 1.2. There is an absolute constant c > 0such that if Xis any cusped hyperbolic surface and λ(n)is a
sequence of signatures with 06=|λ(n)| ≤ clog n
log log nfor sufficiently large n, for every ε > 0we have
Pχ: inf Spec(∆χ,λ(n))1
4εn→∞
1.
In particular, if our irreducible representations are the standard representations U(n)id
U(n) corresponding to the
signatures
λ(n) = (1,0,...,0
|{z }
n1 times
),
Theorem 1.2 implies that asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞, flat unitary rank nbundles over Xhave smallest
eigenvalue at least 1
4ε, irrespective of the spectral gap of Xitself. The following corollary to Theorem 1.2 follows
from the prime geodesic theorem for flat unitary bundles.
Corollary 1.3. Suppose Xis a cusped hyperbolic surface, and let λ1(n),...,λk(n)be ksequences of signatures. Let
fn:= Pk
i=1 aiχλi(n),aiCfixed. Then if for each iwe have |λi(n)| clog n
log log nfor nlarge enough (where c > 0is
the absolute constant in Theorem 1.2), then asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞,χ:π1(X)U(n)satisfies
1
πX(T)X
(γ)T
fn(χ(γ)) = ZU(n)
fn(g)(g) + O(eT /4)
as T→ ∞. Here, πX(T)is the number of closed oriented hyperbolic geodesics γon Xof length (γ)T, and is
the probability Haar measure on U(n).
In turn, we also obtain the following corollary by combining Corollary 1.3 with the main result of Diaconis–Shahshahani [DS94].
RANDOM FLAT BUNDLES AND EQUIDISTRIBUTION 3
Corollary 1.4. Suppose r1and a= (a1,...,ar)and b= (b1,...,br)are r-tuples of non-negative integers. Then
for Xany cusped hyperbolic surface, asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞,χ:π1(X)U(n)satisfies
1
πX(T)X
(γ)T
r
Y
j=1
tr(χ(γj))ajtr(χ(γj))bj=δa,bZCr|z1|2a1...|zr|2ar
r
Y
j=1
1
jeπ|zj|2/j dxjdyj+O(eT /4)
as T→ ∞, where δa,bis the Kronecker delta.
This says essentially that the (tr(χ(γ)),tr(χ(γ2)),...,tr(χ(γr))) distribute according to the law of rindependent com-
plex Gaussians with a good error term. The main term on the right hand side is the expectation of Qr
j=1 tr(gj)ajtr(gj)bj
over U(n). Explicitly, we have
ZCr|z1|2a1...|zr|2ar
r
Y
j=1
1
jeπ|zj|2/j dxjdyj=
r
Y
j=1
jajaj!.
A more difficult problem is the study of the rate at which equidistribution happens. This could be made precise by
bounding the lengths of the geodesic in terms of n. We could ask the following question.
Question 1.5.Given signature λ6= 0, is there a constant C(X, λ)>0 such that
P
χ:π1(X)U(n) :
1
πX(T(n)) X
(γ)<T (n)
χλ(χ(γ))C(X, λ)ec(n)
n→∞
1
for some functions T(n), c(n)>0 going to infinity as n→ ∞? What are the optimal such functions?
Note that given a signature λof length m, we may extend it by zeros to obtain signatures of lengths nfor every
nm. This is how a fixed signature λgives rise to an infinite family of irreducible unitary representations of U(n)
for large enough n.
Definition 1.6. A signature λis unbalanced if the sum of its entries is nonzero. Otherwise, λis balanced.
In relation to Question 1.5, we prove the following theorem whose proof occupies the bulk of this paper.
Theorem 1.7. Suppose Xis a cusped hyperbolic surface, and suppose λ(n)is sequence of unbalanced signatures such
that |λ(n)| ≤ clog n
log log nfor large enough n, where c > 0is the universal constant in Theorem 1.2. Suppose T(n)is a
function of nsuch that T(n)→ ∞ as n→ ∞. For every ε > 0,
(1) P
χ:
1
πX(log T(n)) X
(γ)log T(n)
χλ(n)(χ(γ))n2dim Vλ(n)T(n)1
4+ε
n→∞
1.
A reason we impose the condition that the signatures λ(n) are unbalanced is the following. For unbalanced signatures
λ(n), we show that almost surely, πλ(n)χgives a flat bundle Eχ,λ(n)that is non-singular, that is, whose spectrum has
no continuous part. For balanced signatures λ(n) whose sum of entries is zero, the irreducible representations πλ(n)
are such that for every AU(n), πλ(n)(A) has 1 as an eigenvalue. Since Xis cusped hyperbolic, this means that
for such representations, we always have a continuous part in the spectrum of Eχ,λ(n). The existence of a continuous
spectrum requires a study of the main term of the hyperbolic scattering determinants of such flat bundles. The study
of the hyperbolic scattering determinant in this setting is closely related to currently intractable problems in random
matrix theory. Furthermore, in order to obtain Theorem 1.7 for balanced λ(n), we also need a bound in terms of
Xand λ(n) on the real parts of the resonances of Eχ,λ(n), at least asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞. This
is also related to understanding the main term of the hyperbolic scattering determinants. We briefly discuss these
complications in Section 8.
1.1. Relation to other works. In Hide–Magee [HM21], the authors show that a cusped hyperbolic surface is such
that, for any ε > 0, if one takes n-sheeted covers of it, as n→ ∞, asymptotically almost surely they do not introduce
new eigenvalues less than 1
4ε. In particular, if one starts with a cusped hyperbolic surface with spectral gap at
least 1
4, then one obtains that n-sheeted covers asymptotically almost surely have spectral gaps at least 1
4ε. A
compactification argument allows them to compactify their sequence of hyperbolic surfaces to show the existence of
an infinite family of connected closed hyperbolic surfaces {Xn}nwith increasing genera and spectral gaps λ1(Xn)
satisfying
lim sup
n→∞
λ1(Xn) = 1
4.
4 MASOUD ZARGAR
The existence of such a sequence of hyperbolic surfaces was an important open question in the spectral geometry of
hyperbolic surface. Note that by a theorem of Huber [Hub74], any sequence {Xn}nof closed connected hyperbolic
surfaces with increasing genera satisfies
lim sup
n→∞
λ1(Xn)1
4.
Note that n-sheeted covers of a surface Xare parametrized by surface representations
π1(X)Sn
into the symmetric group Snon nelements. One could instead consider the larger family of rank nat bundles over
X, essentially parametrized by surface representations
χ:π1(X)U(n)
into the unitary group U(n) of rank n. If one wants to investigate how the images of (homotopy classes of oriented)
closed geodesics γon Xunder surface representations χdistribute, we are led to considering class functions f:
U(n)Cevaluated at χ(γ). Since class functions are generated by irreducible characters, we need to understand
the minimal eigenvalue of the Laplacian acting on sections of the flat bundle associated to
π1(X)χ
U(n)πλ(n)
GL(Vλ(n)),
where πλ(n)are irreducible representations. Our first theorem, Theorem 1.2, addresses this minimal eigenvalue prob-
lem. Its proof follows that of the main theorem of [HM21] with the necessary modifications and generalizations to
our unitary setting. The proofs of the other results occupy the bulk of this paper and use other ideas.
The problem considered in this paper is also related to the expected Wilson loops. Indeed, suppose γis a closed
oriented geodesic on a hyperbolic surface X. One could consider the finite space of surface representations
χ:π1(X)Sn
given the uniform probability measure. Then, one could ask about the quantity
Eχ[fixχ(γ)] := 1
|Hom(π1(X), Sn)|X
χ
fixχ(γ),
where fixχ(γ) is the number of fixed points of the permutation χ(γ)Sn. In the case of closed orientable surfaces,
Magee–Puder [MP20] proved the following result.
Theorem 1.8. [MP20, Thm. 1.2] Suppose Xis a connected closed orientable surface. If γπ1(X)is non-trivial
and qNis maximal such that γ=γq
0for some γ0π1(X), then as n→ ∞,
Eχ[fixχ(γ)] = d(q) + O(1/n),
where d(q)is the number of divisors of q.
This is a special case of a more general result they proved. This result was preceeded by a result in the case when X
is not closed, that is, π1(X) is a free group. In this case, Parzanchevski–Puder [PP15] proved the following.
Theorem 1.9. [PP15, Thm. 1.8]
Eχ[fixχ(γ)] = 1 + c(γ)
nπ(γ)1+O(1/nπ(γ)),
where π(γ)∈ {0,...,r}{∞},rthe rank of the free group π1(X), is an algebraic invariant of γcalled the primitivity
rank, and c(γ)N.
In Magee–Naud–Puder [MNP22], the following theorem was used in combination with Selberg’s trace formula to
prove that asymptotically almost surely as n→ ∞,n-sheeted covers of a closed hyperbolic surface introduce no new
eigenvalues below 3
16 ε.
Theorem 1.10. [MNP22, Thm. 1.11]Suppose Xis a closed orientable surface of genus g2. For each g2, there
is a constant A=A(g)such that for any c > 0, if 16=γπ1(X)is not a proper power of another element in π1(X)
with word length w(γ)clog nthen
Eχ[fixχ(γ)] = 1 + Oc,g (log n)A
n.
RANDOM FLAT BUNDLES AND EQUIDISTRIBUTION 5
One could ask for analogues of the above results for surface representations
χ:π1(X)U(n).
In this case, when π1(X) is free, one uses a uniform Haar probability measure. On the other hand, when Xis closed
orientable, then one uses the Atiyah–Bott–Goldman symplectic volume form on the character variety of surface
representations χ. One could then study quantities of the form
Eχ[fn(χ(γ))],
where we are averaging over the surface representations χand fn:U(n)Care class functions. Magee [Mag21] has
studied this question in the case of closed orientable surfaces of genus g2 for the trace function. In particular, he
proved the following.
Theorem 1.11. [Mag21, Cor. 1.2]Suppose Xis a closed orientable surface of genus g2. If γπ1(X), then the
limit
lim
n→∞
Eχ[tr(χ(γ))]
n
exists.
The conjecture is that if γ6= 1, then this limit is actually 0. However, this is not known. In the case of cusped
surfaces, however, a result of Voiculescu [Voi91] states the following.
Theorem 1.12. [Voi91] Suppose π1(X)is free and 16=γπ1(X). Then as n→ ∞,
Eχ[tr(χ(γ))] = oγ(n).
In the case of non-closed surfaces, Magee–Puder [MP19] have related the asymptotic expression for such quantities to
the topology of the surface. If we consider more general families of class functions fn:U(n)C, then the problem
is much more difficult and very little is known.
In the above results, the curve γπ1(X) was fixed and the average was taken over the different spaces of sur-
face representations. However, one could instead fix the surface representation and average over a family of closed
geodesics on a hyperbolic surface X. The theorems proved in this paper are the generalized analogues of some of the
above theorems in this orthogonal regime.
1.2. Outline of the paper. In Section 2, we discuss preliminaries on representation theory, random matrix theory,
flat bundles, and Selberg’s trace formula. In Section 3, we prove Theorem 1.2 on the minimal eigenvalue of the
Laplacian acting on sections of flat unitary bundles. The proof mostly follows that of the main theorem of [HM21]
with the necessary modifications and minor deviations. In Section 4, we prove results in random matrix theory that
allow us to restrict to flat bundles whose spectra do not have continuous parts. In Section 5, we prove probabilistic
Weyl-law type results counting eigenvalues of the Laplacian for flat bundles. In Section 6, we prove Theorem 1.7, a
probabilistic prime geodesic theorem whose error term is explicit in terms of the ranks of the bundles. In Section 7, we
deduce some equidistribution consequences of our spectral Theorem 1.2. In Section 8, we comment on the balanced
case and discuss some of its relations to very difficult problems in random matrix theory.
1.3. Acknowledgments. This project was supported by Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn and Uni-
versity of Southern California.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we briefly discuss preliminaries on flat bundles, representation theory of U(n), random matrix theory,
and Selberg’s trace formula.
2.1. Flat bundles. Suppose Xis a surface with universal cover the upper half plane
H:= {zC|ℑ(z)>0}
which may be equipped with the hyperbolic metric
ds2=dx2+dy2
y2.
Xalso inherits this metric, thus making it into a hyperbolic surface. Throughout this paper, our surfaces Xare
non-compact, connected, hyperbolic, complete, and of finite area. As previously mentioned, we refer to such surfaces
simply as cusped hyperbolic surfaces. For such X,π1(X) is a finitely generated free group. Given any surface
representation
χ:π1(X)U(n),
摘要:

arXiv:2210.09547v2[math.NT]3Dec2023RANDOMFLATBUNDLESANDEQUIDISTRIBUTIONMASOUDZARGARAbstract.Eachsignatureλ(n)=(λ1(n),...,λn(n)),whereλ1(n)≥···≥λn(n)areintegers,givesanirreduciblerepresentationπλ(n):U(n)→GL(Vλ(n))oftheunitarygroupU(n).SupposeXisafinite-areacuspedhyperbolicsurface,χisarandomsurfacerepr...

展开>> 收起<<
Random flat bundles and equidistribution.pdf

共30页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:30 页 大小:438.14KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-29

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 30
客服
关注