In Section 4we apply the general formalism developed in the previous sections to the case of
plane gravitational waves, where we recover the classical Navier–Cauchy equations, supplemented by
boundary conditions where the gravitational wave acts as an effective external traction force.
To illustrate these equations, in Section 5we explicitly solve the simple example of an elastic
thin rod, responding to gravitational radiation. Finally, we compare with Papapetrou’s equations for
gravitational-wave-induced elastic oscillations in Section 6.
Compared to previous treatments of the problem within the CQ theory, this work emphasises the
importance of boundary conditions at the material’s surface, without which no unique solution to the
elasticity equations can be obtained.
This text uses geometric units in which the speed of light is set to unity, and the metric signature
is taken to be “mostly positive.”
2 Review of Relativistic Elasticity
This section reviews the theory development of general relativistic elasticity provided in Ref. [10],
while maintaining the definition of deformation and the notation of various deformation tensors from
Ref. [7], which are closely related to the elasticity theory notions from classical continuum mechanics.
Other related works such as Refs. [4;6;11] follow essentially the same theory development, but use
slightly altered nomenclatures and conventions.
The main object in the CQ theory of relativistic elasticity is the deformation map f:M→B,
where Mis the four-dimensional space-time manifold (with local coordinates xa) and Bis a three-
dimensional manifold, the “body” (with local coordinates XA). The configuration is required to
be such that there is a unique unit timelike vector field va(the material’s four-velocity) satisfying
∂afAva= 0. Conceptionally, this means that fassigns to each point in space-time the material point
present there, and the world-lines of material points are given by lines of constant f.
The velocity vector field gives rise to the spatial projection `a
band the spatial metric `ab via
`a
b=δa
b+vavb, `ab =gab +vavb.(1)
where gab is the space-time metric. The tensor field `a
bprojects vectors onto v⊥, the subspace or-
thogonal to va, and `ab is the restriction of the space-time metric to v⊥and thus encodes the spatial
geometry of the medium. One then defines the spatial deformation gradient HAaand the material
deformation gradient Fa
Athrough the equations
HAa=∂afA, HAcFc
B=δA
B, F a
CHCb=`a
b.(2)
These quantities can be viewed as mappings which translate tensor fields between the configuration
manifold Band the space-time M. Starting from the deformation gradient, one can introduce various
types of deformation tensors as in classical continuum mechanics.
For the purposes of this paper, we will restrict the discussion to the Green deformation CAB and
the Piola deformation BAB, defined as
CAB =Fa
AFb
B`ab , BAB =HAaHBb`ab ,(3)
which also encode the spatial geometry and are essential to obtain a notion of strain. Since `ab and
`ab are inverse to each other, Eq. (2) implies that CAB and BAB are mutually inverse.
To further quantify compression of elastic bodies, and to formulate a continuity equation, a volume-
form on Bis necessary. If Ωis such a form, then its pull-back along the configuration, f∗Ω, is
necessarily proportional to the spatial volume form φ=vyΦ, where Φis the space-time volume form
and ydenotes the interior product. The Jacobian Jis then defined as the proportionality factor in
φ=Jf ∗Ω.(4)
Here, we take Ωto have units of volume, so that Jis dimensionless. The Jacobian Jthus compares the
“actual volume” φwith the “reference volume” Ωand thus measures expansion (J > 1) or contraction
2