which subjects experience against the backdrop of their changing (institutionalised) life
course (Ecclestone et al., 2009a).
The theoretical and empirical approaches to studying these transitions are
heterogeneous. There are studies of rites of passage (van Gennep, 1909/2019), understood
as institutionalised forms of initiating and accompanying transitions between major
turning points in the life course, when people move between different sets of social
networks (such as in the transition from the group of children to the group of adult
members of a family). These status passages are accompanied by new social positions,
with new behavioural expectations and tasks (Glaser & Strauss, 1971; Heinz, 1997). From
a sociological perspective, this research focuses on the social and institutional conditions
of the transitions, the reproduction of social inequality in transitions (Buchmann &
Steinhoff, 2017), and the social demands and challenges people are confronted with. In
contrast, a doing-transitions perspective (Stauber et al., 2022) is interested in the social
practices that produce and shape transitions and in the reconstruction of the individual,
social, and institutional arrangements that constitute and influence the ways in which
people deal with new situations in the life course.
In adult educational research, transitions have been discussed as forms of critical life
events such as divorce, unemployment, the death of the partner, or illness (Merriam, 2005;
Bühler et al., 2023). These are deemed starting points for organising professional
educational support. Furthermore, research is oriented to the institutionalised life course
(Kohli, 1985/2017) and the distinction of different pedagogical institutions. Accordingly,
there are foremost studies that deal with transitions within or departing from the
educational system – from school into vocational training or postsecondary education
(Blossfeld & Rossbach, 2019; Larsen, 2022; Siivonen, 2016) or transitions into and
throughout working life (Billett et al., 2021; Pita Castro, 2014; Stroobants et al., 2001).
Topics include how transition-related challenges are dealt with, how significant others
participate (Settersten & Thogmartin, 2018), and how professionals influence
(successful) entry into the next phase of life (Bridges, 2020).
The serious social, political, and ecological challenges of the last few decades have
clarified that transitions are more than just phases in the institutionalised life course
(Kohli, 1985/2017). In a broader view, they must be seen as part of the coping with
everyday life. Not only the transition from the training phase to employment and then that
to the post-employment phase mark transitions. Family changes (e.g. parenting),
migration, and work-related mobility or a change of career can also be interpreted as
transitions in the life course.
From this perspective, in this paper, transitions can be understood as periods of
uncertainty in which people must deal with different options for action. Drawing on an
understanding of transitions as something to be shaped, constructed, and dealt with, the
focus shifts to the subject that engages with changes in the life course and to whom the
transition represents an impetus for learning. Consequently, we pursue in this paper the
question of how transitions can be conceptualised as an impetus and frame for learning.
In doing so, not only do the subject’s individual transformations come into view, but so
do the learning opportunities. Elaborating on learning opportunities in relation to
transitions, allows us to emphasise the learning’s social dimensions, and to further
develop the educational learning discourse. At the core of our deliberations is the
relationship between transitions and transformations, between the individual’s change of
social state and roles (Elder, 1985) – and the development of altered meaning perspectives
(Mezirow, 1978) or habits of mind (Dewey, 1933/1986).