
(and controversial) Man rather than to the Dogs. But until it can be proved that Man did, in fact, exist,
argument that the discovered fragments originated with Man can have but little point.
Particularly significant or disturbing, depending upon the viewpoint that one takes, is the fact that the
apparent title of the literary fragment is the same as the title of one of the tales in the legend here
presented. The word itself, of course, is entirely meaningless.
The first question, of course, is whether there ever was such a creature as Man. At the moment, in
the absence of positive evidence, the sober consensus must be that there was not, that Man, as presented
in the legend, is a figment of folklore invention. Man may have risen in the early days of Doggish culture
as an imaginary being, a sort of racial god, on which the Dogs might call for help, to which they might
retire for comfort.
Despite these sober conclusions, however, there are those who see in Man an actual elder god, a
visitor from some mystic land or dimensions, who came and stayed awhile and helped and then passed
on to the place from which he came.
There still are others who believe that Man and Dog may have risen together as two co-operating
animals, may have been complementary in the development of a culture, but that at some distant point in
time they reached the parting of the ways.
Of all the disturbing factors in the tales (and they are many) the most disturbing is the suggestion of
reverence which is accorded Man. It is hard for the average reader to accept this reverence as mere
story-telling. It goes far beyond the perfunctory worship of a tribal god; one almost instinctively feels that
it must be deep-rooted in some now forgotten belief or rite involving the pre-history of our race.
There is little hope now, of course, that any of the many areas of controversy which revolve about the
legend ever will be settled.
Here, then, are the tales, to be read as you see fit-for pleasure only, for some sign of historical
significance, for some hint of hidden meaning. Our best advice to the average reader: Don't take them too
much to heart, for complete confusion, if not madness, lurks along the road.
NOTES ON THE FIRST TALE
There is no doubt that, of all the tales, the first is the most difficult for the casual reader. Not
only is its nomenclature trying, but its logic and its ideas seem, at first reading, to be entirely
alien. This may be because in this story and the next a Dog plays no part, is not even mentioned.
From the opening paragraph in this first tale the reader is pitchforked into an utterly strange
situation, with equally strange characters to act out its solution. This much may be said for the
tale, however-by the time one has laboured his way through it the rest of the tales, by comparison,
seem almost homey.
Overriding the entire tale is the concept of the city. While there is no complete understanding
of what a city might be, or why it should be, it is generally agreed that it must have been a small
area accommodating and supporting a large number of residents. Some of the reasons for its
existence are superficially explained in text, but Bounce, who has devoted a lifetime to the study
of the tales, is convinced that the explanation is no more than the clever improvisations of an
ancient storyteller to support an impossible concept. Most students of the tales agree with Bounce
that the reasons as given in the tale do not square with logic and some, Rover among them, have
suspected that here we may have an ancient satire, of which the significance has been lost.
Most authorities in economics and sociology regard such an organization as a city an
impossible structure, not only from the economic standpoint, but from the sociological and
psychological as well. No creature of the highly nervous structure necessary to develop a culture,
they point out, would be able to survive within such restricted limits. The result, if it were tried,
these authorities say, would lead to mass neuroticism which in a short period of time would
destroy the very culture which had built the city.