Proton-neutron entanglement in the nuclear shell model 2
1. Introduction
The structure of atomic nuclei exhibits a mixture of simple and complex behaviors.
What is meant by ‘simple’ can be subtle, but typically it means the behavior can be
described by far fewer degrees of freedom than that required by modeling the nucleus
as a collection of Ainteracting nucleons; examples of simplicity include algebraic
models [1] and mean-field pictures [2]. Of course, one must acknowledge that models
themselves are not physical observables. Furthermore, complex models can mimic
simpler ones, for example quasidynamic symmetries [3, 4, 5], where a Hamiltonian
mixes symmetries yet observables such as spectra and ratios of transition strengths
are consistent with ‘simpler’ symmetry-respecting models.
Entanglement is a concept describing whether the observable coordinates of a
quantum system are independent; whether measurement of one generalized coordinate
q1influences future measurements of another coordinate q2of a system ψ(q1, q2, ...)[6,
7]. Such correlations can be described by the entanglement entropy, a concept which
has become popular in recent years due to increasing interest in quantum information
and the potential of quantum computing [8, 9]. It is trivial to write down states
which are either separable (not entangled) or in a superposition of separable states
(entangled), but the creation of entangled states in nature relies on the existence of
an interaction that mixes the relevant degrees of freedom.
Here we consider the entanglement between the proton components and
neutron components of configuration-interaction models of nuclei. Other recent
work in entanglement entropy in nuclei addressed single-particle and seniority-mode
entanglement [10, 11] as well as orbital entanglement revealing shell closures [12]; we
note the first two papers reference unpublished versions of the research reported here.
Although it does not directly correspond to the work here, we point out previous
analyses of nuclear configuration-interaction wave functions using ‘entropy,’ such as the
configuration information entropy [13, 14], which is simple but basis dependent, and
the invariant correlation entropy [15], which is much more complicated to compute.
By contrast, because of the way our configuration interaction code constructs the
wave functions, extraction of the wave function amplitudes in terms of proton-neutron
coefficients is straightforward, a significant motivation for our approach.
In section 2 we lay out the basic framework of shell-model configuration-
interaction calculations. In section 3, we define entanglement entropy as well as related
concepts. We then provide examples of entanglement entropies for a variety of cases
and show how much of the behavior for ground state entropies can be understood
through standard concepts in nuclear structure physics. A persistent phenomenon,
however, is not so easily explained: realistic ground states of nuclides with N6=Z
tend to have significantly smaller entanglement entropies than those with N=Z.
We also show trends for entropies for all states. We can show this is related to some
components of realistic nuclear forces by contrasting them with results using random
interactions. While the mechanism for suppressing the entanglement eludes us, it
is nonetheless worth reporting, not only as an apparently robust yet unexplained
phenomenon, but also because it has a practical consequence: the low-lying states
of neutron-rich nuclides have fewer nontrivial correlations between the proton and
neutron components. This, in turn, suggests a practical approach for such nuclides,
one which we are currently developing.