oceans. I was one of a coalition of Ephesionite scholars. The vessel we had chartered for our year of
reconnaissance was rigged with elaborate signal beacons on a scaffold in the foredeck, for we sought parley with every
vessel we sighted at sea, and inquired into their crews’ affairs—their travels, homes, and modes of life—as
studiously as we logged coasts, climes, and oceanic phenomena. In our second month out, as we skirted the
Glacial Maelstroms, we spied a brig of exotic design. We hailed her and, shortly, hove alongside her for our
habitual trade of amenities and news.
The brig’s masters were two wealthy carpet merchants from Fregor Ingens, and there was a third man with
them who was in the manner of a junior partner and clerk. This man poured out the drinks for our convivial little
assembly. I looked at the broad, rawboned hand that tipped the beaker to my cup, looked up along the stark
length of arm, and into Nifft’s black, spark-centered eyes. He had grown his hair long and wore it pulled back
into a braided club on his neck, in the style of the Jarkeladd nomads, and this revealed that he now lacked his left
ear, but Nifft it surely was. Our conversation on this occasion was one of covert looks only, for I quickly
perceived his association with the merchants he so deferentially attended was of a type which sudden disclosure
of his identity could jeopardize. I did not compromise him, though I smiled to myself to think of all I would hear
from my friend the next time we sat at liquor together.
And I would not have compromised him now, as these volumes must do were Nifft ever to reenter the world
of men. I would have delayed this work interminably out of reluctance to acknowledge his loss by completing
this verbal monument to his life and deeds. But I am old, and my health is more than a little imperfect. No one
knows his term, and I have been compelled to accomplish this labor while labor lay still within my power. From
this, the great importance I attach to this work should be obvious. At the same time I must confess that during the
months I have devoted to these documents, I have been no stranger to the despairing cynicism with which all
men must grapple in the winter of their lives. Mockingly I have asked myself my labor’s aim. Is it to set my
friend’s excellence before the eyes of Posterity? But “Posterity”—what a hair-raising gulf of time is masked by
that word! An illimitable boneyard of Histories lies already behind us. Worlds on worlds of men have flowered,
died and drifted on their time-islands into the desolation of eternity, and worlds more lie ahead of us—that, or the
end of all. I have seen archaic maps which showed me the faces of earths utterly different from this, minutely
rendered geographies which no man will find today in any of the five seas. Whither, on what unguessable
currents, do I launch this man’s fame, and what eddy will it end in, an impenetrable fragment in a tongue
unknown to the wisest scholars, if it is preserved at all?
But I have set aside this cynical lassitude as a wasteful and childish mistake. Though a light burn
comparatively small in the darkness, its first and consuming necessity is to broadcast all the illumination in its
power. While it is foolish to deny the dark around us, it is futile to exaggerate it. And I make bold to say that I am not the
only one of my countrymen who could profit from taking this admonition to heart.
I have in mind the notion that is so fashionable nowadays, namely that we live in a Dark Age where puny
Science quails before many a dim Unknown on every hand. Surely this sort of facile pessimism dampens the
energy of inquiry even as it leads to obscurantism—toward a despair of certainty which encourages us to
embrace truth’s, half-truths, and the most extravagant falsehoods with a promiscuous lack of discrimination.
What responsible person denies—to speak only of the cartographic science—that vast tracts of land and sea
remain mysterious to the wisest? The great Kolodrian mountain systems are an instance. The Thaumeton Island
Group, the hinterlands of the Jarkeladd tundras, are further examples. But mark in this how clearly we can define
our ignorance. The fact is, our world’s main outlines—coasts and climes, seas and currents—are known. It is the
same in other disciplines. We have sufficient fragments of sufficient histories to know that man has been both far
more powerful and far more abject than he is today. If our tools and techniques are crude compared to the
fabulous resources of ages past, they are also marvels of efficacy to what our race has muddled through within
yet other periods.
Granting that our knowledge be limited, what can it profit us to traffic in lurid fantasies and errant
imaginings? When—certainty failing us—we must speculate, let us recognize the difference between careful
enumeration of reasonable hypotheses, and the reckless multiplication of bizarre conceptions. To illustrate with a
classic instance, we cannot say what demons are. If the knowledge ever existed, it is lost to us now. Conse-
quently, we must acknowledge several theories which continue to dominate the discussions of serious students of the
question. Demons, few of whom lack some human component, may have been the parent stock of Man. Or they
may have been spawned by man, his degenerate progeny. Possibly, they are his invention run wild, artifacts of a
potent but diseased sorcery he once possessed. And, conceivably, the subworlds were populated according to Undle
Ninefingers’ suggestion, which holds that the demons arose as a “spiritual distillate” of human evil, a
“coagulation” of psychic energies into the material entities we know today. The judicious man, though he have
his private leaning, must grant all of these some claim to credence. But must he entertain the idea that demons
come from seeds which are rained upon the earth at each full moon? Or that each demon is the “vital shadow” of
a living man, engendered below in the instant of that man’s conception, and extinguished in the moment of his