
1 2 3 4
(a) K∅
(b)
(c) K{3}
(d) K{2}
(e) K{2,3}
(f) K{3}
Figure 1: The adiabatic time evolutions of a mass-spring system (N=4) along
two paths C1and C2, which share endpoints. (a) The mass-spring chain has
four particles (indicated by circles) and satisfies the fixed boundary condition
(indicated by two crosses). The system is initially in the slowest normal mode.
(b) During C1, the third particle is adiabatically clamped (indicated by two
rectangles). (c) After completing C1, the oscillation localizes at the left part of
the system, and thus the right part (indicated by gray circles) ceases. During
C2, the second and third particles are clamped successively ((d) and (e)), and
the clamp for the second particle is released finally. The resultant oscillation
localizes at the right part of the system (f). The values of the adiabatic parameter
K(e.g., K∅and K{3}) are explained in the main text.
Hamiltonian
H=1
2
N
X
i=1
p2
i+1
2
N
X
i,j=1
Ki j xixj,(1)
where xiand piare the displacement and momentum of the i-
th particle (1 ≤i≤N) and m=1 is assumed. The N×N
real symmetric matrix Kdescribes the harmonic springs and
pinnings and is adiabatically varied. According to the adiabatic
theorem, once the system is prepared to be in a normal mode,
specified by a normalized eigenvector ξaof K, the system stays
in a normal mode. Let ωadenote the normal mode frequency
corresponding to ξa.
Our adiabatic paths visit the points where the particles are
clamped to bring the braiding of adiabatic normal modes. The
clamps are made of infinite pinning strength. For example, i-
th particle is clamped when Kii is infinitely large. We denote
K=K{i}if i-th particle is clamped and no pinning is imposed
on other particles. We note that a mathematical analysis of the
parametric evolution along variable pining strength is shown in
Ref. [32] to examine classical oscillations with variable rigidity.
Also, similar operations have been utilized to study the role of
topology change in quantum systems [33, 34].
We introduce the endpoints of adiabatic operations. For sim-
plicity, N=4 is assumed. At the initial point of the paths,
no pinning is imposed on the mass-spring chain, denoted as
K=K∅(Fig. 1 (a)). On the other hand, we assume K=K{3},
i.e., infinitely strong pinning is imposed to clamp the third par-
ticle, at the endpoint. The system at K{3}is accordingly divided
into two, where the “left” and “right” parts are N=2 and N=1
mass-spring chains under the fixed boundary condition, respec-
tively (Fig. 1 (c) and (f)).
Both of two adiabatic paths C1and C2connect K∅and
K{3}. During the path C1, the pinning is imposed only on the
third particle (Fig. 1 (b)) to adiabatically cut the whole sys-
tem (Fig. 1 (c)). On the other hand, C2involves “cut” and
“splice”. Namely, C2connects K∅,K{2},K{2,3}and K{3}in or-
der, where i-th and j-th particles are simultaneously clamped at
(a)
(c)
(a)
(d)
(e)(f)
K∅K{3}K{2,3}K{2}K∅
ω1
ω2
ω3
ω4
ω1
ω2
ω3
ω4
Figure 2: Normal mode frequencies in N=4 mass-spring chain with clamps.
The horizontal axis represents the closed path C, where the configurations of
clamps are indicated. The adiabatic evolution of the ground normal mode ω1
at K∅along C1(thick line) and C2(thick dashed line) emanate from the left
and right ends, respectively, where the intermediate points shown in Fig. 1 are
depicted by circles. The evolutions of the ground mode from the left end (thick
line) to the right end (thin line) arrive at the first excited mode ω2, where the
continuity of the normal mode vector is kept. Hence the closed path Cinduces
the mode holonomy.
K{i,j}(1 ≤i,j≤N) (Figs. 1 (a), (d), (e) and (f)). Examples of
the parametrization of the paths are shown in Appendix A.
We examine the adiabatic evolutions along C1and C2. We
assume that the initial system at K=K∅is in the ground normal
mode, with frequency ω1being the slowest.
The adiabatic evolution along C1delivers the ground mode
of K∅to the one of K{3}. This is due to the absence of spec-
tral degeneracy in C1(see, Fig. 2). Since the system at K{3}is
divided into two, the final ground mode localizes at the larger,
left part. The rightmost particle accordingly ceases to oscillate
although it is not clamped (Fig. 1 (c)).
On the other hand, the adiabatic time evolution along C2pro-
ceeds as follows. The system at K{2}is in the ground mode and
localized at the right side of the clamp (Fig. 1 (d)) because of
the symmetry between K{2}and K{3}. The adiabatic clamp on
the third particle “compresses” the mode at K{2,3}to localize at
the rightmost particle (Fig. 1 (e)).
We must correctly handle the degeneracy point at K{2,3}. The
degenerate normal mode vectors localize at either end of the
mass-spring chain. Note that these normal modes are not hy-
bridized, as the complete clamps separate them. The system’s
state accordingly localizes at the right part around K{2,3}in C2.
Also, the state arrives at the first excited normal mode after
K{2,3}and stays there. Hence the adiabatic evolution along C2
transports the ground mode at K∅to the first excited mode at
K{3}.
We conclude that the result of the adiabatic evolution of a
normal mode from K∅to K{3}depends on the path. Further-
more, the adiabatic evolution is topological, as the possible can-
didates of the final normal modes are discrete.
3. Normal mode pump
We utilize the path-dependent adiabatic time evolution to
construct a normal mode pump. Let Cdenote the closed path
made of C1and the inverse of C2. Namely, Cconnects K∅,
K{3},K{2,3},K{2}and K∅in order. The adiabatic evolution along
2