
2
the possible synchronization between the local atomic
degree of freedoms (spins-1/2) which evolve with a fre-
quency set by the competition of their local field and
collective photon-mediated interactions. In the desyn-
chronized phase, which we call Phase-I as shorthand,
all the spins evolve independently as a result of domi-
nant classical dephasing processes imprinted by the lo-
cal inhomogeneous fields, thus S(t) relaxes to zero. In
the synchronized phase, collective interactions lock the
phase precession and we can distinguish three different
scenarios in which S(t) either relaxes to a stationary
value (Phase-II), up to a phase of a Goldstone mode [56]
associated to a global U(1) symmetry, or its magnitude
enters self-generated oscillatory dynamics, corresponding
to a Higgs mode [56], either periodic (Phase-III), or ape-
riodic (Phase-IV). While Phase-I and Phase-II describe
relaxation to a steady state up to an irrelevant global
phase, Phase-III and Phase-IV are instead examples of
a self-generated oscillating synchronization phenomenon
without an external driving force [68–71].
A. Summary of results
In this work we investigate dynamics beyond two-level
approximations by considering Nabosonic atoms, each
hosting Nlevels which realize SU(N) spins. The addi-
tional structure due to the bosonic statistics allows us
to naturally consider both classical and quantum initial
states (c.f. Sec. II C). Using this flexibility in the initial
state, and also the tunability of Hamiltonian parameters,
we show how to craft not only the dynamical responses
present in the two-level integrable setup (from Phase-I
up to Phase-IV), but also how to access a novel chaotic
dynamical response. This chaotic response, which we re-
fer to as Phase-IV?, again has all atoms synchronized but
with the dynamics of the average atomic coherences char-
acterized by exponential sensitivity to initial conditions.
The self-generated chaotic Phase-IV?emerges from the
interplay of initial quantum correlations, and the collec-
tive interactions mediated by the cavity field. It is there-
fore qualitatively different from chaos induced by other
mechanisms as due to additional local interactions [72]
or external pump [30, 73–76].
In order to show how to craft and control these dy-
namical responses, we introduce a generalization of the
reduction hypothesis used for two level systems. Specif-
ically, we propose that the different dynamical phases
(Phase-I up to Phase-IV∗) all correspond to a different ef-
fective few body Hamiltonian that depends on the global
symmetries of the many body system, degree of inho-
mogeneity, W, number of atomic levels N, and degree
of quantum correlations in the initial state, quantified
by a parameter p(cf. Sec. IV B). Then, by consider-
ing an appropriate classical limit arising in the limit of
large system size (cf. Sec. II B), we apply the Liouville-
Arnold theorem to the effective Hamiltonian to identify
a correspondence between the dynamical phases and the
effective Hamiltonians. Using physical arguments for the
FIG. 1. Cartoon of the possible dynamical responses of intra-
level phase coherence in a photon-mediated spin-exchange
model between SU(3) spins, as a function of the degree of
inhomogeneity of the local fields W, and of quantum corre-
lations in the initial state parameterized by p. At p= 0
each site is initialized in the same bosonic coherent state. For
p > 0, there are finite quantum correlations in the system.
The parameter ptunes from bosonic coherent states (p= 0)
to a multimode Schr¨odinger cat state (p > 0) initialized on
each site. The susceptibility of the dynamical response to
quantum correlations is strictly linked to having SU(N) spins
with N > 2, thus cannot be achieved considering two-level
systems. Up to inhomogeneity W/(χNa)≈1, the system
is in the synchronized phase. At larger inhomogeneities, the
system enters in the desynchronized phase and all phase co-
herence is washed (Phase-I). In the synchronized phase, phase
coherence relaxes asymptotically to a nonzero value up to a
phase associated to a global U(1) symmetry (Phase-II), or its
magnitude enters a self-generated oscillatory dynamics, either
periodic (Phase-III), or aperiodic (Phase-IV), as well as po-
tentially chaotic (Phase-IV?). In this last case dynamics are
exponentially sensitive to changes in initial conditions.
nature of the effective Hamiltonian, we then predict how
to tune between different dynamical responses. The re-
sult is an intuitive control over the rich dynamical re-
sponse possible in multilevel cavity QED. See Fig. 1 for
a cartoon of the different dynamical responses for N= 3
level atoms, using as a proxy the synchronized (or de-
synchronized) evolution of the magnitude of the average
intra-level coherences in the ensemble.
We conclude by discussing the potential universality of
the reduction hypothesis. In particular, we conjecture it
applies not only for state-of-the-art cavity QED experi-
ments (cf. Sec. VI), but could find potential applications
in other fields. Following Refs. [77, 78], where cavity
QED platforms are proposed to model the dynamics of
s-wave and (p+ip)-wave BCS superconductors, our re-
sults could find potential applications to lattice systems
with local SU(N) interactions, such as SU(N) Hubbard
models [79–82]. Another possible outreach of our results
could consist in noticing that the Nlevels of the atoms
could be used as a synthetic dimension, with the geom-
etry fixed by the photon-mediated processes, as for in-
stance in a synthetic ladder system [83, 84]. Furthermore,
since we consider bosonic systems, our results could po-