
2
of a monopole/anti-monopole pair in the confined phase
in detail. In order to do so, we considered a SU(2)
gauge theory and chose a simple scalar sector capable of
achieving the above-mentioned configuration via sponta-
neous symmetry breaking: a scalar field in the adjoint
representation, and a complex scalar doublet. The for-
mer breaks (Higgses) the gauge group SU (2) to U(1),
therefore admitting t’Hooft-Polyakov monopoles as a so-
lution [13,14]. The latter breaks the residual U(1) gauge
group leading to the confinement of the associated “mag-
netic flux”. Our study covers the regime in which the
monopole size and the string width are comparable. The
similarities with confined quarks are established in the
analogous regime.
It turns out that the point-like limit approximates very
well the part of the classical dynamics in which the
monopole separation is much larger then the character-
istic width of the system. However, beyond this regime
we observe some new features.
Naively, it is expected that a collapsing straight string
performs several oscillations. That is, one would think
that after shrinking, the end points (monopoles) scatter
and fly apart stretching a long string again. In this way,
the string would contract and expand with certain peri-
odicity, as some sort of a rubber band.
However, we observe that in head-on collision the out-
come is very different. After the first shrinkage the string
never recovers. Instead, the entire energy is converted
into the waves of Higgs and gauge particles. These waves
can also be thought of as large number of overlapping
short strings.
We explain this phenomenon and argue that in analo-
gous kinematic regime the similar effect takes place in
case of confined quarks. In this particular regime, in both
cases, the outcome can be understood as the result of the
entropy suppression for production of a highly coherent
state in a collision process [15]. Due to this, instead of
stretching a long string, the system prefers to produce
many particles (short strings) which have a much higher
entropy. In case of QCD, the collapse of a long string re-
sults into a high multiplicity of glueballs (closed strings)
and mesons (open strings).
We also point out that inability of monopole and anti-
monopole to going through each other, falls in the same
category as the suppression of the passage of a magnetic
monopole through a domain wall, studied in [16]. In
that example, the domain wall provides a support base
for unwinding the monopole, similar to the role of the
antimonopole in the present case. The recreation of the
monopole state on the other side of the wall is unlikely
due to the insufficiency of the microstate entropy of the
monopole for overcoming the exponential suppression of
the corresponding multi-particle amplitude [15]. This
leads to the “erasure” of monopoles by domain walls.
In [16], this mechanism was used to solve the cosmolog-
ical monopole problem in grand unified theories. How-
ever, the phenomenon of erasure is of broader fundamen-
tal interest. In particular, this is indicated by the simi-
larities between the erasure processes of confined quarks
and confined monopoles discussed in the present paper.
It emerges that in the studied regime, the processes of
the collapse of the confined pairs in both theories are
governed by the same universal effect: the exponential
suppression of production of a high occupation number
(coherent) state, albeit of insufficient entropy [15]
The GW spectrum produced by confined monopoles is
appropriately captured by the point-like result for scales
larger than the monopole width. As expected, we ob-
serve non-negligible corrections to the power spectrum
for scales comparable to the monopole radius, where the
emitted radiation is boosted, therefore providing correc-
tions to the GWs emission produced by the confinement
dynamics.
We expect that our results have implications for the col-
lapse of the generic bounded strings such as the string-
theoretic strings bounded by D-branes [17,18].
The paper is organized as follows. First we discuss the
system of confined monopoles and study it numerically.
Next, we explain the underlying physics that is shared by
confined quarks and monopoles. We then study emission
of gravitational waves. Finally we discuss sphalerons and
give outlook and conclusions.
II. SETUP
We will work with a SU(2) gauged field theory that con-
tains a scalar field in the adjoint representation, ϕa(a =
1, 2, 3), a scalar field in the fundamental representation,
ψ, and gauge fields, Wa
µ. The Lagrangian of the system
is given by
L=1
2DµϕaDµϕa+(Dµψ)†Dµψ−1
4Waµν Waµν −V(ϕ, ψ)
(2)
where summation over repeated SU(2) indices is under-
stood, and the field strengths for the gauge field is
Wa
µν =∂µWa
µ−∂νWa
µ+gabcWb
µWc
ν.(3)
The covariant derivatives are defined as
Dµϕa=∂µϕa+gabcWb
µϕc,(4)
Dµψ=∂µψ−ig σa
2Wa
µψ, (5)
and the potential is given by [19]
V(ϕ, ψ) = λ
4(ϕaϕa−η2)2+˜
λ
2(ψ†ψ−v2)2+c ψ†σaψϕa.
(6)
As the first stage of symmetry breaking, we give vac-
uum expectation value to the adjoint field while keep-
ing ψ= 0. The system admits ’t Hooft-Polyakov
monopoles [14,20]. As ψacquires vacuum expectation