Eect of ambient gas on cavity formation for sphere impacts on liquids Hollis Williams1 James Sprittles2 Juan C. Padrino3 and Petr Denissenko1 1School of Engineering University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK

2025-05-03 0 0 3.44MB 15 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Effect of ambient gas on cavity formation for sphere impacts on liquids
Hollis Williams1, James Sprittles2, Juan C. Padrino3, and Petr Denissenko1
1School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
2Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
3School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Contact email: 1Hollis.Williams@warwick.ac.uk, P.Denissenko@warwick.ac.uk
2J.E.Sprittles@warwick.ac.uk, 3padr0006@umn.edu
Keywords: boundary layers, contact line dynamics, flow instability, wetting
Abstract
Formation of a splash crown and a cavity following the impact of a sphere on a body of
liquid is a classical problem. In the related problem of a droplet splashing on a flat surface,
it has been established that the properties of the surrounding gas can influence the splashing
threshold. At lower impact speeds, this is due mainly to the influence of gas kinetic effects,
since the height of the gas lubrication film which is displaced during dynamic wetting is
often comparable to the mean free path of the gas. At higher Weber and Reynolds numbers,
on the other hand, inertial effects dominate and the density of the gas becomes important
in determining whether a splash occurs. In this article, sphere impacts on a liquid body are
investigated in a rarefied atmosphere using high-speed photography. It is found that the
threshold entry speed for cavity formation is influenced by the density of the surrounding gas,
whereas changing the mean free path of the gas has no effect. We attribute this phenomenon
to the gas slowing the sealing of the thin crown sheet behind the sphere. This assertion is
supported with experimental measurements of the liquid sheet thickness. In the range of
parameters considered, the splash crown influences the movement of the contact line, an
effect not previously observed.
1 Introduction
A sphere plunging through the free surface of a body of liquid may splash and form a cavity which trails
behind it. Air-water entry of projectiles has been studied since the nineteenth century [1, 2]. Early
studies, based mostly on the work of von K´arm´an and Wagner [3, 4], assumed that one can neglect the
effects of liquid viscosity and surface tension due to large Reynolds and Weber numbers. These studies
also neglect the presence of surrounding gas due to its low density. Subsequent work has shown that
this picture is oversimplified and that the ambient gas influences dynamics of the cavity following a
liquid-solid impact [5, 6, 7]. Furthermore, Duez et al. established that both viscosity and surface tension
of the liquid play a role in cavity formation, finding also that wettability of the impacting body is an
important factor in determining the threshold speed Ufor air entrainment [8]. Later, Marston et al.
found that a falling sphere entraps a small amount of air at the bottom of the sphere due to the air
pocket which forms because of the lubrication pressure in the gas layer between the sphere and the liquid
surface. This phenomenon is due to the air pocket which forms because of the lubrication pressure in
the gas layer between the sphere and the liquid surface prior to impact. As the liquid surface deforms, a
thin sheet of air is produced which contracts to a bubble at the south pole of the sphere [9]. Numerical
simulations have found that cavity formation is connected with pinning of the contact line around the
sphere and that viscosity of the gas in the film between the sphere and the liquid plays a role during
early impact [10, 11].
There have been many studies of other variants of the falling sphere problem, although none have
focussed directly on the influence of the surrounding gas on cavity formation [12]. Aristoff et al. consid-
ered buoyant low-density spheres, finding expressions for the pinch-off time of a cavity and the volume
1
arXiv:2210.15369v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 27 Oct 2022
of air entrained by the sphere [13]. Hurd et al. studied the water entry characteristics of deformable
elastomeric spheres, finding that the oscillations of these spheres during impact results in new types of
nested cavities [14]. Watson et al. examined spheres with heterogeneous wetting properties, finding that
spheres which are partly hydrophilic and partly hydrophobic always have asymmetric cavities and drift
away from straight-line trajectories [15]. Marston et al. observed cavity formation for heated sphere
impacts, finding that there is an inverted Leidenfrost effect when the sphere temperature is much larger
than the boiling point of the liquid, which either produces a cavity with smooth walls or a double cavity
structure [16]. Mansoor et al. also studied superhydrophobic spheres in detail and used a splash-guard
mechanism to eliminate the phenomenon known as surface seal [17]. Related studies have considered
projectiles with varying aspect ratios and impacts on a two-phase fluid [18, 19, 20].
The process of splash curtain formation in the sphere impact problem shares some similarities with
splashing of a liquid droplet, but is believed to be driven by different physical mechanisms [21, 22].
Nevertheless, the similarities which exist might lead one to wonder whether the dynamics of the splash
curtain can be influenced by the properties of the surrounding gas, given that it is now well-established
that the properties of the surrounding gas play a significant role in influencing droplet splashing. This
line of investigation was initiated by Xu et al. who observed that splashing of a droplet when it impacts
against a flat smooth surface can be completely suppressed by reducing the pressure of the surrounding
gas [23]. Xu studied the dependence of droplet splashing on the roughness and texture of the surface,
confirming that there is a different type of splashing caused by surface roughness (called prompt splash-
ing) which must be distinguished from corona splashing on a smooth surface due to the presence of the
surrounding air [24]. Benkreira and Khan demonstrated that air entrainment in the related problem of
a dip coating flow can also be suppressed under reduced pressures and attributed this effect to the mean
free path of the gas [25].
The regimes considered by these authors are typically for low impact speeds, where gas kinetic effects
are important and the mean free path plays a significant role. This occurs because the maximum speed at
which the liquid can wet the solid surface is controlled by the speed at which the wetting gas lubrication
film in front of the moving contact line is displaced. The height of these films is typically extremely thin
(of the same order as the mean free path of the gas) and as a consequence both droplet splashes and dip
coating flows can be successfully described by models which incorporate kinetic effects [26, 27, 28]. As
an example, the model of [26] uses kinetic theory in the gas film as described by the Boltzmann equation
and combines this with regular hydrodynamics in the liquid phase as described by the Navier-Stokes
equations.
On the other hand, in the Gordillo-Riboux model for droplet splashing, the threshold speed for
splashing is determined using the fact that splashing occurs due to a vertical lift force on the edge of
the liquid sheet from the surrounding gas. This lift force has two contributions: the lubrication force
KlµgVtand the suction force KuρgV2
tHt, where µgis the viscosity of the gas, ρgis the density
of the gas, Vtis the initial velocity of the ejected lamella and Htis the initial height of the lamella.
Kland Kuare coefficients which are derived from detailed calculations of the lift force in the region
located between the lamella and the substrate (these calculations show that Klis approximately equal
to a sum of two terms which both depend on the mean free path of the gas) [27]. The lubrication force
captures the viscous contributions to the lift force on the lamella edge and the suction force captures the
inertial forces. Note that viscosity is actually a mean free path effect, since changes in gas pressure do
not change the viscosity of the gas. During the characteristic impact time, viscous effects are confined
to thin boundary layers with a typical width much lower than the radius of the droplet R. Since the
gas Reynolds number Regbased on Htand Vtas the characteristic scales is ∼ O(10), both the viscous
and inertial contributions to the lift force must be considered. The model suggests as expected that at
higher Weber and Reynolds numbers the dominant forces in the droplet splashing problem for a smooth
dry surface are inertial in nature [27].
Experimental evidence for this was found by Burzynski et al., who found that gas entrapmment is
not the mechanism which is responsible for splashing at high Weber and Reynolds numbers and that
splashing is influenced primarily by the density, not the mean free path, of the surrounding gas [29].
This was done by considering a flywheel experiment and different gases at atmospheric pressure, with
splashing outcomes analysed by measuring the size, velocity and angle of ejected secondary droplets. The
splashing outcome was also determined from the total volume ejected, where the theoretical expression
for the volume is calculated using the Gordillo-Riboux theory [27]. Guo et al. conducted numerical
simulations of droplet impingement and splashing on dry and wet surfaces at very high impact speeds,
finding that splashing on a dry surface can be suppressed by lowering the ambient gas density and that
the properties of the ambient gas do not significantly influence splashing on a wet surface [30]. The
2
simulations used a dynamic contact line model to define the boundary condition at the moving contact
line and found that increasing the density of the gas increases the number of secondary droplets ejected
from the lamella.
The Gordillo-Riboux model has since been expanded by Pierzyna et al. using a data-driven threshold
model which re-defines the threshold for droplet splashing on a dry smooth surface by collating a large
number of experimental sources with different conditions and analysing the data with an uncertainty
qualification analysis combined with machine learning [31]. The Gordillo-Riboux model can be considered
as the special case where the parameter βfor determining splashing is a constant (in the general case, each
impact parameter has a different dependence on β). This more detailed threshold model incorporating a
large number of diverse experimental results observed a linear dependence of the splashing threshold β
on impact speed V, surface tension σand gas density ρgand an inversely proportional relation between
βand the liquid viscosity µl. This new model exhibits only weak dependency on the radius of the droplet
R, liquid density ρl, gas viscosity µgand the mean free path of the gas λg. These dependent variables
are eliminated by a recursive feature elimination process to leave the four impact conditions mentioned
above. The eliminated variables are only irrelevant in their sense that they are irrelevant beyond the
expression for β, so the Gordillo-Riboux captures all the influence of the eliminated variables on the
splashing parameter, such that they are needed for any further corrections.
In this paper, we use high-speed photography to investigate the influence of the surrounding gas on
cavity formation following the impact of a smooth dry wettable sphere on the free surface of a liquid body.
We begin in Section 2 by varying properties of both the solid and the liquid, finding agreement with
existing experimental data on threshold speeds for cavity formation. We then investigate the influence
of the surrounding gas on cavity formation by using air, argon, and helium at different pressures hence
varying gas density and the mean free path, obtaining results which diverge from the existing theoretical
models. In particular, we observe that cavity formation following a sphere impact on a liquid surface can
be completely suppressed by reducing the pressure of the gas. This is the first time that the transition
from a cavity to a no cavity event has been effected only by changing the properties of the ambient gas.
We find that the most important parameter for influencing cavity formation is the density of the ambient
gas and that the mean free path of the gas has negligible influence. In Section 3, we provide a theoretical
explanation for this effect based on the phenomenon by which the ambient gas influences the sealing of
the crown sheet behind the sphere. We finish in Section 4 with conclusions and suggestions for future
work.
2 Core Experimental Results
Spheres were released from an electromagnet above a container of silicone oil located inside a depres-
surised chamber. The chamber was filled with air, argon, or helium at pressures from 0.05 bar to
atmospheric. Silicone oil was used instead of water to reduce the threshold entry speed for cavity for-
mation and to prevent damage to the vacuum pump by water vapour. The vapour pressures of the oils
used are all less than 0.002 bar, well below the pressures used in experiments, so that the influence of oil
evaporation can be neglected.
The spheres were made of untreated chrome steel with density of 7.8 g/cm3and static contact angle
θ20 25which makes them oleophilic. The mean square roughness of the spheres was measured
using a Bruker Contour profilometer at 0.3µm, well below the thickness of the viscous boundary layer,
reaching O(100 µm) at the sphere equator. Typical image sequences acquired when a sphere of diameter
15 mm plunges into the oil at atmospheric pressure, at 0.53 bar, and at 0.5 bar are shown in Fig. 1,
demonstrating that reduced pressures can suppress cavity formation. The impact of the sphere into the
liquid was captured against an LED backlight with a Photron FASTCAM SA-X2 high-speed camera at
a frame rate of 12 500 fps. To provide consistent surface wettability, the sphere was washed after each
experiment with dilute ethanol, and then washed twice with deionised water.
A series of experiments was conducted using spheres with diameters 2, 8, and 15 mm; silicone oils
with viscosities µL= 0.87, 1.74, and 2.61 cP; and entry speeds Vfrom 1 to 3.5 ms1. The oil density
varies little with viscosity, being ρ= 0.9, 0.87, and 0.9 g cm3, respectively, and the surface tensions
are measured to be in the range σbetween 15 and 20 mN/m. Three different gases are used for the
surrounding atmosphere (helium, air and argon) which have molecular masses M= 4, 29, and 39 Daltons,
respectively. Since the mean free path of the gas λgdepends on the molecular mass, this allows us to
separately isolate the effects of changing the density and the mean free path of the gas. Results are shown
as points in Fig. 2 in the parameter space of the capillary number Ca = µLV and the normalised gas
3
摘要:

E ectofambientgasoncavityformationforsphereimpactsonliquidsHollisWilliams1,JamesSprittles2,JuanC.Padrino3,andPetrDenissenko11SchoolofEngineering,UniversityofWarwick,CoventryCV47AL,UK2MathematicsInstitute,UniversityofWarwick,Coventry,CV47AL,UK3SchoolofEngineering,NewcastleUniversity,NewcastleuponTyne...

展开>> 收起<<
Eect of ambient gas on cavity formation for sphere impacts on liquids Hollis Williams1 James Sprittles2 Juan C. Padrino3 and Petr Denissenko1 1School of Engineering University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK.pdf

共15页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:15 页 大小:3.44MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-03

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 15
客服
关注