Effect of many-body interaction on de Haas-van Alphen oscillations in insulators Gurpreet Singh and Hridis K. Pal Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India

2025-05-03 0 0 3.86MB 11 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Effect of many-body interaction on de Haas-van Alphen oscillations in insulators
Gurpreet Singh and Hridis K. Pal
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
(Dated: November 10, 2023)
De Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) oscillations are oscillations in the magnetization as a function of the
inverse magnetic field. These oscillations are usually considered to be a property of the Fermi surface
and, hence, a metallic property. Recently, however, such oscillations have been shown to arise, both
experimentally and theoretically, in certain insulators which have a narrow gap and an inverted band
structure. In this work, we develop a theory to study the effect of many-body interaction on these
unconventional oscillations. We consider weak interaction, focusing on the effect of renormalization
of the quasiparticle spectrum on these oscillations. We find that interaction has an unusual effect:
unlike in metals, in a certain regime the amplitude of oscillations may be enhanced substantially,
both at zero and nonzero temperatures, even when the interaction is perturbatively weak.
One of the striking consequences of Landau quantiza-
tion in a magnetic field in metals is the appearance of
quantum oscillations. These are oscillations in physical
observables of metals, both thermodynamic and trans-
port, with a change in the magnetic field. The underlying
mechanism is simple: as the magnetic field increases, the
spacing between the Landau levels widens. This forces
the highest occupied level to spill out of the Fermi level
and become depopulated periodically, which manifests as
oscillations in various observables. Evidently, these os-
cillations are expected only in metals and are measured
routinely in experiments to map the Fermi surface of such
systems [1, 2].
In recent years, however, quantum oscillations have
been reported experimentally in various insulators. De
Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) oscillations, which refer to os-
cillations in the magnetization, have been observed in the
Kondo insulator SmB6[3–6], while Shubnikov-de Haas
(SdH) oscillations, which refer to oscillations in the resis-
tivity, have been observed in the Kondo insulator YbB12
[7], quantum well heterostructures [8, 9], WTe2[10], and
moir´e graphene [11]. Such unexpected findings prompted
intensive theoretical investigations which have now re-
vealed that contrary to the canonical picture, quantum
oscillations can indeed arise in insulators, provided the
insulators have a narrow gap and an inverted band struc-
ture [12–16].
Although the phenomenon is now well-understood at
the noninteracting level, the effect of interactions on
these unconventional oscillations remains insufficiently
explored. Research in this direction has predominantly
concentrated on specific models of correlated insulators
where interaction causes the opening of the gap [17–20]
but not on generic band insulators with interaction. Ex-
ploring the latter is important since it offers a controlled
approach to compare oscillations in insulators with those
in metals. Moreover, from an experimental perspective,
investigating this aspect is significant since some of the
systems where unconventional oscillations have been ob-
served are of this nature [8, 9], and the abundance of
possibilities in this category suggests more explorations
in the future.
In this work, we develop a theory of quantum oscilla-
tions in interacting band insulators, focusing specifically
on dHvA oscillations. We consider weak interactions,
incorporating it within the Hartree-Fock approximation.
Notably, we find that in a certain parameter regime, even
weak interactions can significantly modify the amplitude
of oscillations unlike in metals. This arises because in-
teractions now competes with a new energy scale in the
form of a gap which is absent in a metal, thus influencing
oscillations in a qualitatively different manner.
To put our results for the insulator in context, we
first review the theory of dHvA oscillations in metals.
The oscillating part of the magnetization is given by
Mosc =osc
B , where Ωosc is the oscillating part of the
grand potential and Bis the external magnetic field. In
a three-dimensional interacting metal with a parabolic
spectrum of spinless electrons, considering only the renor-
malization of the energy spectrum due to a static interac-
tion potential at the Hartree-Fock level, it is found that
[2, 21] (= 1)
˜
osc =
X
l=1
˜
Al(T)cos 2πl ˜µ
˜ωcπl+1
4,(1)
where ˜ωc=eB/ ˜mis the cyclotron frequency with eas
the absolute value of the charge and ˜mas the mass of
an electron, respectively, ˜µis the chemical potential, and
˜
Al(T) is the temperature (T)-dependent amplitude of the
l-th harmonic of oscillations given by (kB= 1)
˜
Al(T) = ˜ωc
(eB)3/2
8π4l5/2
2π2lT /˜ωc
sinh(2π2lT /˜ωc).(2)
Above, and henceforth, the presence (absence) of tilde de-
notes renormalized (bare) values of the respective quanti-
ties. The expressions (1) and (2) are, in fact, identical to
the ones that appear in the noninteracting case, except
for the appearance of renormalized parameters [22, 23]:
µ˜µ=µ(1 + b) (3a)
ωc˜ωc=eB
˜m=eB
m(1 + a),(3b)
where band acapture the degree of renormalization in
µand m, respectively. One can readily summarize the
following salient features:
arXiv:2210.10475v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 9 Nov 2023
2
FIG. 1. Schematic band structure for the Hamiltonian in (4)
with ϵ1kand ϵ2khaving curvatures of different sign. Dotted
curves show bands before hybridization. The hybridization
results in a gap.
1. The phase does not change with interaction.
2. The change in frequency is negligible: Because
µωc, V , where Vis the strength of interaction,
˜µ/˜ωcµ/ωc.
3. At T= 0, the change in the amplitude is small in
proportion to the strength of the weak interaction
since ˜
Al(0) ˜ωc. The amplitude decreases mono-
tonically with rise in T.
We now proceed to investigate dHvA oscillations in an
insulator. Consider the following Hamiltonian:
H=X
i,k
εikc
ikcik+X
kγkc
1kc2k+ h.c.+Hint.(4)
Here, c
ik(cik), i= 1,2, denotes the creation (destruc-
tion) operators for particles with momentum kin the
i-th band with dispersion εikin three dimensions. These
two bands are hybridized by γk. For simplicity, we choose
ε1k=k2
2m1∆ and ε2k=k2
2m2with m1,2,>0, and
assume γk=γto be independent of kwith |γ| ≪ ∆.
Also, all particles are assumed to be spinless. The first
two terms in Eq. (4) describe the noninteracting part
and is easily diagonalized leading to an insulator with an
inverted band structure and a narrow gap—see Fig. 1.
The chemical potential µis chosen to lie inside the gap.
The last term in Eq. (4), Hint, introduces interparticle
interaction, whose exact form is not necessary for the
results to be derived—we only assume that the interac-
tion is static and weak so that its effect can be included
perturbatively at the Hartree-Fock level which leads to a
renormalization of the energy levels but no broadening.
In the presence of a magnetic field, discrete Landau
levels are produced that are affected by the interaction.
We calculate the grand potential using the standard for-
mula [22]:
˜
Ω = TTr
X
ζm
ln{−[˜
G1(ζm)]}
.(5)
Here, ξm= (2m+ 1)πT , with mZ, are the Matsub-
ara frequencies, Tr stands for the trace over all energy
states, and ˜
Gis the Green’s function corresponding to
(4) in a magnetic field given by ˜
G1=G1Σ, where
Gis the noninteracting Green’s function and Σ is the
self-energy due to the interaction. In the band-basis, we
have G1
11 =mωc1n+1
2k2
z
2m1+∆+µ,G1
22 =
m+ωc2n+1
2+k2
z
2m2+µ, and G1
12 =G1
21 =γ,
where nis the Landau level index and ωc1,2=eB/m1,2.
In general, Σ is a function of both Band Tand requires
a substantial effort to calculate. However, as far as dHvA
oscillations in three dimensions are concerned, it suffices
to consider Σ calculated at zero Band T—as in the case
of metals, the effect of nonzero Band Tleads to sublead-
ing corrections in orders of ωc1,2/1 and T/1,
respectively [23–25]. Within this approximation, we eval-
uate the oscillating part of Eq. (14) and find,
˜
osc =
X
l=1
˜
Al(T)cos "2πl ˜
˜ωc1+ ˜ωc2πl+1
4#,(6)
where
˜
Al(T) = (eB)3/2
π2l3/2TX
ζm>0
eπl
˜ωc1˜ωc2ζ2
m(˜ωc1+˜ωc2)2+4˜ωc1˜ωc2˜γ2
×cosh πm(˜ωc2˜ωc1)
˜ωc1˜ωc2.(7)
Details of the derivation are provided in Supplemental
Material (SM) [26]. The above expressions are charac-
terized by the following renormalized parameters:
ωc1,2˜ωc1,2=eB
˜m1,2
=eB
m1,2
(1 + a1,2),(8a)
˜
∆ = ∆(1 + b),(8b)
γ˜γ=γ(1 + t),(8c)
µ˜µ=µ+δµ. (8d)
Note that, while ˜ωc1,2,˜
∆, and ˜γappear explicitly in
Eqs. (6) and (7), ˜µenters implicitly through the Mat-
subara sum. Thus, it affects only the T-dependence of
the oscillations, and has no effect on the T= 0 behav-
ior, as long as µand ˜µlie in the gap. For simplicity,
we have assumed ˜µ=˜
∆ ˜m1
˜m1+ ˜m2, chosen such that it lies
at the intersection of the two renormalized bands prior
to hybridization [27]. Equation (6) along with Eqs. (7)
and (19) generalize Eqs. (1), (2), and (3) from an in-
teracting metallic system to an interacting gapped sys-
tem. Thus, for a given form of Hint in Eq. (4), one
simply needs to calculate the renormalization parameters
ai, b, t to study the effect of interaction on dHvA oscil-
lations. We will come back to this calculation later; for
now, we discuss the qualitative features that arise from
these expressions. It is seen that the phase remains un-
altered and the frequency does not change appreciably
since 1 ˜
˜ωc1+˜ωc2
ωc1+ωc2; thus, both these quanti-
ties remain qualitatively similar to those in metals. In
3
FIG. 2. The effect of interaction on the amplitude at T= 0 according to Eqs. (9) and (19). ˜
A1(0) denotes the amplitude of
the first harmonic at T= 0 in the presence of interaction. It is normalized by its noninteracting value A1(0). We show its
variation with a1and tkeeping a2= 0.2 fixed in all the plots. The points Q, R, and Sare arbitrarily chosen in the interaction-
parameter-space defined by (a1, a2, t) which are referred to in Fig. 3 later.
contrast, the amplitude is significantly affected by inter-
actions, in a way that is qualitatively different from that
in metals.
First, we consider ˜
Al(0), the amplitude at T= 0.
Changing the summation to an integral over the fre-
quency in Eq. (7), we find,
˜
Al(0) = |˜γ|(eB)3/2
2π3l3/2K14πl|˜γ|
˜ωc1+ ˜ωc2,(9)
where Kαis the modified Bessel function of the second
kind. Equation (9), together with Eqs. (19), gives a quan-
titative description of how the amplitude is affected by
interaction. It leads to an unusual feature that is unique
to the insulating case: even a weak interaction can lead
to a substantial change in the amplitude of oscillations
at zero temperature. Indeed, the fate is decided by a
delicate interplay between ˜γand ˜m1,2in Eq. (9). Us-
ing the parametrization of Eq. (19) in Eq. (9), we plot
the first-harmonic-amplitude in Fig. 2 for different val-
ues of m1/m2(determining the particle-hole asymmetry)
and γc1(determining the strength of the gap as com-
pared to the Landau level spacing). It is seen that when
γc11, there is a pronounced enhancement in the
zero-temperature-amplitude, which can amount to even
an order of magnitude.
Next, we consider the dependence of the amplitude on
T. This is calculated numerically from Eq. (7) and is
presented in Fig. 3 for various choices of interaction pa-
rameters m1/m2and γc1as used in Fig. 2. In the limit
Tγ, as expected, the T-dependence follows the usual
metallic behavior, contributed by the two participating
bands. It only depends on ˜m1,2and is independent of
˜γ. In the other limit, T<
γ, the T-dependence deviates
from the metallic behavior, and depends on both ˜m1,2
and ˜γ. The deviation is most striking when m1/m21
and γc11. In this regime [Fig. 3(d)] There is a size-
able enhancement in the amplitude in the form of a non-
monotonic upturn driven by Ton top of the enhancement
at T= 0 discussed earlier. An interesting observation is
that since the behavior of the amplitude at low Tin the
particle-hole asymmetric case is very sensitive to γc1,
for a given material (with a fixed γand ˜γ) the effect of
temperature depends crucially on the field at which the
oscillations are being studied to extract the amplitude.
Indeed, Figs. 3(c) and (d) can be interpreted as the tem-
perature dependence of the amplitude of the same dHvA
摘要:

Effectofmany-bodyinteractionondeHaas-vanAlphenoscillationsininsulatorsGurpreetSinghandHridisK.PalDepartmentofPhysics,IndianInstituteofTechnologyBombay,Powai,Mumbai400076,India(Dated:November10,2023)DeHaas-vanAlphen(dHvA)oscillationsareoscillationsinthemagnetizationasafunctionoftheinversemagneticfiel...

展开>> 收起<<
Effect of many-body interaction on de Haas-van Alphen oscillations in insulators Gurpreet Singh and Hridis K. Pal Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India.pdf

共11页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:11 页 大小:3.86MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-03

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 11
客服
关注