Schwinger-Keldysh path integral formalism for a Quenched Quantum Inverted Oscillator Sayantan ChoudhuryID1Suman Dey2Rakshit Mandish

2025-05-03 0 0 1.28MB 25 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Schwinger-Keldysh path integral formalism for
a Quenched Quantum Inverted Oscillator
Sayantan Choudhury ID 1,Suman Dey2,Rakshit Mandish
Gharat3,Saptarshi Mandal4,§and Nilesh Pandey1
1Centre For Cosmology and Science Popularization (CCSP),
SGT University, Gurugram, Delhi- NCR, Haryana- 122505, India,
2Department of Physics, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, Birbhum-731235, India,
3Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka-575025, India, and
4Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, India,
In this work, we study the time-dependent behaviour of quantum correlations of a system of an
inverted oscillator governed by out-of-equilibrium dynamics using the well-known Schwinger-Keldysh
formalism in presence of quantum mechanical quench. Considering a generalized structure of a time-
dependent Hamiltonian for an inverted oscillator system, we use the invariant operator method to
obtain its eigenstate and continuous energy eigenvalues. Using the expression for the eigenstate, we
further derive the most general expression for the generating function as well as the out-of-time-
ordered correlators (OTOC) for the given system using this formalism. Further, considering the
time-dependent coupling and frequency of the quantum inverted oscillator characterized by quench
parameters, we comment on the dynamical behaviour, specifically the early, intermediate and late
time-dependent features of the OTOC for the quenched quantum inverted oscillator. Next, we study
a specific case, where the system of inverted oscillator exhibits chaotic behaviour by computing the
quantum Lyapunov exponent from the time-dependent behaviour of OTOC in presence of the given
quench profile.
I. Introduction
In theoretical high energy physics, the underlying concept of the Feynman path integral is applicable to quantum
systems for which the vacuum state in far future is exactly the same as in far past. Clearly, the Feynman path
integral is not applicable for quantum systems with a dynamical background. The Schwinger-Keldysh [15] formalism
appears within the framework of quantum mechanics, where the physical system is placed on a dynamical background,
i.e., quantum dynamics of the system is far from equilibrium. Schwinger-Keldysh formalism seems to be the most
formidable choice to evaluate generating functionals and correlation functions in out-of-equilibrium quantum field
theory and statistical mechanics [6]. It unravels the prodigious toolbox of equilibrium quantum field theory to out-
of-equilibrium problems. There are large numbers of applications of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in various fields, for
instance, condensed matter physics[711], cosmology [1215] (in the context of the primordial universe), black hole
physics[16,17], high energy physics - theory and phenomenology [1822], and more.
The time-dependent states for dynamical quantum systems can be computed by solving Time-Dependent Schrodinger
Equation (TDSE). One of the ways to solve TDSE is by constructing the Lewis-Resenfield invariant operator and this
is often termed as invariant operator representation of the wavefunction [23]. Some works following this approach to
compute the time-dependent eigenstates are reported in refs. [2428].
Highly complex behavior of quantum systems can often be studied using a simple model of Standard Harmonic
Oscillator (SHO). Sister to SHO is the Inverted Harmonic Oscillator (IHO) that has remarkable properties which are
applicable throughout many disciplines of physics [13,20,2948]. The quantum treatment of IHO is exactly solvable
similar to that of SHO. Unlike SHO, IHO can be used to model complicated types of out-of-equilibrium systems.
A key idea for quantifying the propagation of detailed quantum correlation at out-of-equillbrium, information theo-
retic scrambling via exponential growth, and quantum chaos can be easily studied via out-of-time-ordered correlators
or simply "OTOC" [49]. OTOC has been widely used as a tool to probe quantum chaos in quantum systems [5057].
In a more general sense OTOC is a mathematical tool using which one can easily quantify quantum mechanical
correlation at out-of-equilibrium. Motivated by the work of [58], Kitaev [59] emphasized arbitrarily ordered 4-point
Corresponding Author: sayantan_ccsp@sgtuniversity.org, sayanphysicsisi@gmail.com
dey.suman.vbu@gmail.com
rakshitmandishgharat.196ph018@nitk.edu.in
§saptarshijhikra@gmail.com
nilesh911999@gmail.com
arXiv:2210.01134v2 [hep-th] 2 Oct 2024
2
correlation functions, as "out-of-time-ordered correlators", in constructing analogies between effective field theories,
making the connection between superconductors [60] and black holes [61,62].
Most of the recent works in many-body physics focus on studying dynamics of quantum systems where some time-
dependent parameter is varied suddenly or very slowly. This is commonly refereed to as a Quantum Quench. The
quench protocol is said to drive any out of equilibrium system and in turn can trigger the thermalisation process of
these systems, [6365]. The effects of quenches in quantum systems have even been explored experimentally for cold
atoms in [6675]. A few of the works focusing on OTOCs in the context of quenched systems are [7680].
Motivated by all these ideas, in this work, we compute the OTOC for inverted oscillators having a quenched coupling
and frequency, using Schwinger-Keldysh path integral formalism. In section II the continuous energy eigenvalues and
normalized wavefunction for a generic Hamiltonian of a time-dependent inverted oscillator are computed [81] using
the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method. In section (III), we construct the action for the Lagrangian of generic time-
dependent inverted oscillator. Using this action we derive the generating function for the inverted oscillator in section
IV. We modify this generating function using Shwinger-Keldysh path integral formalism in section V, following the
prescription of [6]. Using this generating function and the Green’s functions computed in Appendix Bwe finally
compute the OTOC for inverted oscillator in terms of Green’s functions in section VI. In the section (VII), we have
numerically studied dynamical behaviour of the OTOC by quenching coupling and frequency of the inverted oscillator.
We have also computed the Lyapunov exponent and commented on the chaotic behavior of the inverted oscillator in
this section. Section (VIII) serves as the final section of our study before providing pertinent future possibilities and
directions.
II. Formulation of Time-dependent Generalized Hamiltonian Dynamics
In this section, we explicitly discuss the crucial role of a system described by a time-dependent quantum mechanical
inverted oscillator in a very generic way to deal with path integrals and different types of quantum correlation
functions (anti time ordered, time ordered, out-of-time-ordered). A generalised Hamiltonian for a time-dependent
inverted oscillator can be written as:
ˆ
H(t) = 1
m(t)ˆp21
2m(t)Ω2(t)ˆq2+1
2f(t) (ˆpˆq+ ˆqˆp).(1)
Here ˆq(t)denotes the time-dependent generalized coordinate, m(t)is the time-dependent mass, Ω(t)is the time-
dependent frequency, and f(t)is a time-dependent coupling parameter. In general these time dependent parameters
can be anything. It is significant to note that, in contrast to the SHO, the second term, which represents the potential
energy of the inverted harmonic oscillator, has a negative sign. The main reason for the negative sign in the potential
energy is that for inverted oscillator, the harmonic oscillator frequency, ω(t), is replaced by (t). We can write the
Euler-Lagrange equation for the coordinate ˆq(t)of the inverted oscillator as:
Dt2
eff ˆq(t)=0,(2)
where the differential operator Dtis defined as:
Dt=d2
dt2+dln m(t)
dt
d
dt.(3)
The squared effective time-dependent frequency in Eq.(2) is defined by:
2
eff (t)=Ω2(t) + f2(t) + ˙m(t)
m(t)f(t) + ˙
f(t).(4)
where the dot corresponds to the differentiation with respect to time "t". Then, the Euler-Lagrange equation in (3)
gives the equation of motion in the simplified form as:
¨
ˆq+˙m
m˙
ˆq2
eff (t)ˆq= 0.(5)
Next, the TDSE for the above mentioned time dependent system can then be written as:
ˆ
H(t)Ψ(q, t) = iΨ(q, t)
t .(6)
Now, to derive the eigenstates and energy eigenvalues of the above TDSE, we will use Lewis-Resenfield invariant
operator method, in the next section, which will be an extremely useful tool to deal with the rest of the problem.
3
A. Lewis–Riesenfeld Invariant Method
In this subsection we apply the technique of Lewis-Riesenfield invariant operator method to calculate the time
dependent eigenstates and energy eigenvalues for the generalised Hamiltonian of inverted oscillator as given in Eq.(1).
The Lewis-Riesenfield invariant method is advantageous for obtaining the complete solution of an inverted harmonic
oscillator with a time-dependent frequency having PT symmetry. In this subsection, we will construct a dynamical
invariant operator to transit the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian from prescribed initial to final configurations, in
arbitrary time. Let us assume an Invariant operator ˆ
I(t)which is a hermitian operator and explicitly satisfies the
relation:
dˆ
I(t)
dt =1
i[ˆ
I(t),ˆ
H(t)] + ˆ
I(t)
t ,(7)
so that its expectation values remain constant in time. Here ˆ
H(t)is the time-dependent Hamiltonian of our system
defined earlier in Eq.(1). If the exact form of invariant operator, ˆ
I(t), does not contain any time derivative operators,
it allows one to write the solutions of the TDSE as:
ψn(q, t) = en(t)φn(q, t).(8)
Here, φn(q, t)is an eigenfunction of ˆ
I(t)with eigenvalue nand µn(t)is the time-dependent phase function. Note that
for the sake of simplicity, we are writing ˆqas qand the same for other operators. This means we further remove all
hats. Next, we consider that time-dependent linear invariant operator for the system in the form:
I(t) = α(t)q+K(t)p+γ(t),(9)
where α(t),K(t), and γ(t)are the time-dependent real functions. Using Eq.(7) we get:
˙α(t) + α(t)f(t) = K(t)m(t)Ω2(t)
˙
K(t)K(t)f(t) = α(t)
m(t)
˙γ(t)=0.
(10)
From Eq. (10) one can find the following second order differential equation:
¨
K+˙m
m˙
K2
eff (t)K= 0,(11)
where the squared effective time-dependent frequency is defined in Eq.(4) before. Therefore, we can write the Eq.(9)
as:
I(t) = K(t)pm(t)h˙
K(t)K(t)f(t)iq. (12)
Now we intend to find the eigenstate φn(q, t)of I(t)using the following eigenvalue equation:
Iφn(q, t) = n(q, t)(13)
Here, the eigenstates satisfy the orthonormalization condition,which is, φn|φn=δ(nn). Subsituting the expres-
sion of I(t)from Eq. (12) in the above Eq.(13), one can find the continuous eigenstates of the inverted oscillator:
φn=Nexp (im(t)
2K(t)[˙
K(t)f(t)K(t)]q2+2n
m(t)q).(14)
It is very straightforward to calculate the normalizing constant, N, which is given by the following expression:
N=r1
2πK .(15)
One can find the phase factor by inserting the eigenfunction of invariant operator in TDSE and solving the following
equation:
˙µnφn=i
t Hφn.(16)
4
Using Eq.(8), we can write the wavefunction in the normalized form:
ψn=r1
2πK en(t)exp (im(t)
2K(t)[˙
K(t)f(t)K(t)]q2+2n
m(t)q).(17)
Now, to prove that the wave functions are always finite, we have to find the integration over all possible continuous
eigenvalues, which is given by:
Ψ(q, t) = Z
−∞
g(n)ψn(q, t)dn. (18)
Here g(n)is the weight function. It helps one to find which state the system is in. Let’s consider the weight function
as a gaussian function, which is of the following exact form:
g(n) = a
(2π)1
4
exp a2n2
4.(19)
Here ‘a’ is a real positive constant. Substituting the above form of weight function in Eq.(18) and integrating over all
possible continuous eigenvalues, one can write the wavefunction for inverted oscillator as:
Ψ(q, t) = 2A(t)
π1/4
exp iB2(t)+[iB1(t)A(t)]q2.(20)
Here,we define the time dependent functions as:
A(t) =K2a214y2
a41
,
B1(t) = m(˙
KfK)
2K+2y
K2a41 + 4y2
a4,
B2(t) = 1
2tan12y
a2,
y(t) = Zt
0
m(τ)K2(τ).(21)
Now having obtained the normalization factor, we can write the expression for the energy of our desired quantum
system as:
E=r2A(t)
πZ
−∞
Ψˆ
HΨdq. (22)
Inserting the Eq.(20), ˆ
Hand conjugate of Eq.(20) into the Eq.(22) one can show that the time-dependent energy for
inverted oscillator is given by the following expression:,
E=1
2m(t)B2
1(t)
A(t)+A(t)+1
8
m(t)Ω2(t)
A(t)+f(t)B1(t)
2A(t).(23)
It is interesting to observe that the energy eigenvalues are independent of nbut energy is a continuous function of
time. Furthermore, there is no zero-point energy associated with this system of inverted oscillator.
III. Evaluation of Action
In this section we start with a Lagrangian of the inverted oscillator and derive the representative action for the
generalised inverted oscillator. We express the action in terms of Green’s functions which are derived in Appendix B.
The action thus obtained will be useful for deriving the generating function of inverted oscillator. Here, it is important
to note that the generating function in the present context physically represents the partition function in Euclidean
signature.
5
As the Green’s function for inverted oscillator, given in Eq.(B12) is hyperbolic in nature, one can use the hyperbolic
identities. Inferring from [6] one can then write the classical field solution for the inverted oscillator as,
¯q(t) = 1
G(T)qfG(tt0) + q0G(tft) + Ztf
t0
dt[G(T)Θ(tt)G(tt)G(tt0)G(tft)] J(t).(24)
The time-derivative of this field can be given by,
˙
¯q=1
G(T)qf˙
G(tt0)q0˙
G(ttf) + Ztf
t0
dt[G(T)Θ(tt)˙
G(tt)˙
G(tt0)G(tft)]J(t).(25)
Here Ttft0, such that t0and tfdenote the initial time and final time respectively. Also, ¯q(t0) = q0and ¯q(tf) = qf
are the intial and final field configurations respectively. Applying the boundary condition ˙
G(0) = 1 one can find,
˙
¯q(t0) = 1
G(T)qfq0˙
G(T)Ztf
t0
dtG(tft)J(t).(26)
Furthermore, using the hyperbolic identity,
˙
G(T)G(tft)˙
G(T)G(tft) = G(tt0),(27)
we obtain:
˙
¯q(tf) = 1
G(T)qf˙
G(T)q0+Ztf
t0
dtG(tt0)J(t)(28)
In general, the action for any field is given by:
S=Ztf
t0
[L+J(t)q(t)]dt. (29)
Here the term J(t)is an auxiliary time dependent field and Lis the Lagrangian of the system. For an inverted
oscillator the the representative Lagrangian can be written as:
L=1
2m(t) ˙q2+m(t)ω(t)2q2f(t)m(t) ˙qq (30)
Substituting, Eq.(30) in Euler Lagrange equation the equation of motion for the inverted oscillator becomes,
m(t)¨q+˙
m(t) ˙q"m(t)ω(t)2f(t)˙
m(t)m(t)˙
f(t)#q= 0 (31)
Substituting Eq.(30) in (29) the action for the inverted oscillator can be expressed as:
S=Ztf
t01
2m(t) ˙q2+1
2m(t)ω2(t)q2f(t)m(t) ˙qq+J(t)q(t)dt. (32)
Using the equation of motion i.e. Eq.(31) and the definition of classical field solution as stated in Eq.(24), we find
the classical limit for the action of inverted oscillator as,
Scl(q0, qf|J)S(¯q) = 1
2m(t)¯q˙
¯q
tf
t01
2f(t)m(t)¯q2
tf
t0
+1
2Ztf
t0
dtJ(t)¯q(t).(33)
The final expression for the action can be obtained using Eq.(26) and Eq.(28), as given below:
S(q0, qf|J) = 1
2m(tf)1
G(T)q2
f˙
G(T)q0qf+Ztf
t0
dtqfG(tt0)J(t)m(t0)1
G(T)qfq0q2
0˙
G(T)+
Ztf
t0
dtq0G(tft)J(t)1
2f(tf)m(tf)q2
ff(t0)m(t0)q2
0+1
21
G(T)Ztf
t0
dt[G(tt0)qf+G(tft)q0]J(t)
1
G(T)Ztf
t0
dt Ztf
t0
dt[Θ(tt)G(tft)G(tt0) + Θ(tt)G(tft)G(tt0)]J(t)J(t).
(34)
摘要:

Schwinger-KeldyshpathintegralformalismforaQuenchedQuantumInvertedOscillatorSayantanChoudhuryID1,∗SumanDey2,†RakshitMandishGharat3,‡SaptarshiMandal4,§andNileshPandey1¶1CentreForCosmologyandSciencePopularization(CCSP),SGTUniversity,Gurugram,Delhi-NCR,Haryana-122505,India,2DepartmentofPhysics,Visva-Bha...

展开>> 收起<<
Schwinger-Keldysh path integral formalism for a Quenched Quantum Inverted Oscillator Sayantan ChoudhuryID1Suman Dey2Rakshit Mandish.pdf

共25页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:25 页 大小:1.28MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-03

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 25
客服
关注