STABLE ENVELOPES FOR SLICES OF THE AFFINE GRASSMANNIAN IVAN DANILENKO

2025-05-03 0 0 879.12KB 71 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
STABLE ENVELOPES FOR SLICES
OF THE AFFINE GRASSMANNIAN
IVAN DANILENKO
Abstract. The affine Grassmannian associated to a reductive group Gis
an affine analogue of the usual flag varieties. It is a rich source of Poisson va-
rieties and their symplectic resolutions. These spaces are examples of conical
symplectic resolutions dual to the Nakajima quiver varieties. We study the
cohomological stable envelopes of D. Maulik and A. Okounkov[MO] in this
family. We construct an explicit recursive relation for the stable envelopes in
the G=PSL2case and compute the first-order correction in the general
case. This allows us to write an exact formula for multiplication by a divisor.
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview. In their influential paper [MO] D. Maulik and A. Okounkov stud-
ied equivariant cohomology H
T(X) of the Nakajima quiver varieties X[N2, N,
N3]. They showed that H
T(X) are modules over a quantum group called Yan-
gian. The key tools in their constructions were the R-matrices, which essentially
came from a family of special bases, called stable envelopes. Their construction
of stable envelopes works quite generally for a symplectic resolution with a torus
action [see assumptions in Chapter 3 in [MO] or in Section 3].
From the perspective of gauge theories, Nakajima quiver varieties are Higgs
branches of moduli spaces of vacua in a 3d supersymmetric field theory. The 3d
mirror symmetry is known to exchange the Coulomb (X) and the Higgs branch
(X) of vacua [IS, SW]. To understand the relations between the enumerative
geometry of Xand X, we study the Coulomb side directly.
The key object to get Coulomb branches is the moduli space called the affine
Grassmannian Gr. It is associated with a complex connected reductive group G,
and one can think of it as an analogue of flag varieties for the corresponding Kac-
Moody group. It is known to have deep connections with representation theory and
Langlands duality [G,MV,MV2]. A big family of Coulomb branches [BFN,BFN2]
is given by the transversal slices in affine Grassmannians. To give an idea of what
these slices are, recall that the affine Grassmannian Gr has a cell structure similar
to Schubert cells in the ordinary flag variety. A transversal slice Grλ
µdescribes how
one orbit is attached to another. Similarly to Nakajima quiver varieties, they are
naturally algebraic Poisson varieties and, in some cases, admit a smooth symplectic
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 55N25, 14J42, 14D21.
1
arXiv:2210.09967v2 [math.AG] 27 Jul 2024
2 IVAN DANILENKO
resolution Grλ
µGrλ
µ, which is a notion of independent mathematical interest
[K,K2,BK]. The goal of this work is to study the equivariant cohomology of these
resolutions.
We study the stable basis Stabϵ
C(p) introduced in [MO]. It is also given by
the images of 1pH
T(p) under a map
Stabϵ
C: H
TXAH
T(X).
Note that these are going in the ”wrong” way, compared to the natural restriction
maps. We are working in ordinary equivariant cohomology, see our convetions is
Section 3.
The main choice to make is the choice of attracting directions in a torus,
which is here denoted by Cas a Weyl chamber. Informally, the classes Stabϵ
C(p) are
”corrected” versions of the (Poincar´e dual) fundamental classes of the attracting
varieties to p. The notion of attracting variety clearly depends on the choice of C.
This basis is a rich source of enumero-geometric data; see [MO]. Even for
purely computational convenience, they are useful because they are non-localized
classes of low degree, and this allows one to use the degree bounds effectively.
However, this comes with a price. As opposed to the fixed-point basis, the mul-
tiplication by a divisor is no longer diagonal. Fortunately, it is not that far from
it.
For a T-equivariant line bundle Twe have
cT
1(L)Stabϵ
C(p) = ι
pcT
1(L)·Stabϵ
C(p) + X
q<Cp
cL
p,q Stabϵ
C(q)
for some cL
p,q Q. Furthermore, these numbers cL
p,q can be easily recovered if one
knows ι
qStabϵ
C(p) modulo 2.
We find the restrictions ι
qStabϵ
C(p) in two steps.
Use the wall-crossing behavior of ι
qStabϵ
C(p) modulo 2to reduce the
computation to a similar computation on a wall in Lie A, which turns
out to be a slice for G=PSL2, the case of A1type. This is done in
Theorem 3.22
Find the restrictions for A1-case via the action of Steinberg correspon-
dences. This computation ends with Theorem 3.21 and has a flavor similar
to that of C. Su’s thesis [S].
For special line bundles Eispanning Pic(X)ZQwe get the following main
formula
cT
1(Ei)Stabϵ
C(p) = Stabϵ
C
Hi(p) + X
j<i
ji
C(p)X
i<j
ij
C(p)
in Theorem 3.29.
Since multiplications by cT
1(Ei) act with a simple spectrum, this formula
uniquely determines the stable envelopes.
STABLE ENVELOPES FOR SLICES OF THE AFFINE GRASSMANNIAN 3
1.2. Structure. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2we recall the main
facts about the slices in the affine Grassmannian, and in Section 3we prove the
main results about the stable envelopes. For the reader’s convenience, we keep the
proofs of the technical facts until the Appendix A.
Acknowledgments. The author is thankful to Mina Aganagic, Joel Kamnitzer,
Henry Liu, Davesh Maulik, Andrei Negut, Andrei Okounkov, Andrey Smirnov,
Changjian Su, and Shuai Wang for discussions related to this paper.
2. Slices of the affine Grassmannian
In this section, we recall some facts about slices of the affine Grassmannians.
2.1. Representation-theoretic notation. Let us present the notations we use
for common representation-theoretic objects. One major difference from standard
notation is that we use non-checked notation for coobjects (coweights, coroots, etc.)
and checked for ordinary ones (weighs, roots, etc.). This is common in the literature
on the affine Grassmannian since it simplifies notation. And the unexpected side
effect is that weights in equivariant cohomology will have checks. We hope this
will not cause confusion.
Gis a connected simple complex group unless stated otherwise,
AGis a maximal torus,
BAis a Borel subgroup,
gis the Lie algebra of G
X(A) = Hom(C×,A) is the cocharacter lattice, it’s equal to the coweight
lattice if Gis of adjoint type,
X(A)+X(A) the submonoid of dominant cocharacters.
W=N(A)/Ais the Weyl group of G,
g=hL
α
gαis the root decomposition of g.
ρis the half-sum of positive roots.
K(,) Weyl-invariant scalar product on cocharacter space X(A)ZR,
normalized in such a way that the length squared of the shortest coroot is
2 (equivalently, the length squared of the longest root is 2).
We identify all weights with Lie algebra weights (in particular, we use additive
notation for the weight of a tensor product of weight subspaces).
2.2. Classical constructions.
2.2.1. Affine Grassmannian. Let O=C[[t]] and K=C((t)). We will refer to
D= Spec Oand D×= Spec Kas the formal disk and the formal punctured disk,
respectively. The main references for this section are [BD, MV, KWWY].
Let Gbe a connected reductive algebraic group over C. The affine Grass-
mannian GrGis the moduli space of
4 IVAN DANILENKO
(1)
(P, ϕ)
Pis a G-principle bundle over D,
ϕ:P0|D×
P|D×is a trivialization of P
over the punctured disk D×
where P0is the trivial principal G-bundle over D. It is representable by an ind-
scheme (see [BD] 4.5.1).
One can give a less geometric definition of the C-points of the affine Grass-
mannian
GrG(C) = G(K)/G(O)
where we use notation G(R) for R-points of the scheme Ggiven a C-algebra R.
We will use this point of view when we talk about the points in GrG.
The see that these are exactly the C-points of GrG(i.e. the pairs (P, ϕ)
as in (1)), note that over Dany G-principle bundle is trivializable, so take one
trivialization ψ:P0
P. This gives a composition of isomorphisms
(2) P0|D×
ψ|D×
P|D×
φ1
P0|D×
which is a section of P0|D×, i.e. an element of G(K). The change of trivialization
ψpre-composes with a section of P0, in other words, pre-composes with an element
of G(O). This gives a quotient by G(O) from the left.
We restrict ourselves to the case of connected simple (possibly not simply-
connected) Gin what follows without losing much generality. Restating the results
to allow for an arbitrary connected complex reductive group is straightforward.
From now on, we fix a connected simple complex group G. Since it cannot
cause confusion, we later omit Gin the notation GrGand just write Gr.
The group G(K)⋊ C×naturally acts on Gr. In the coset formulation, the
G(K)-action is given by left multiplication and C×-acts by scaling variable tin K
with weight 1. In the moduli space description G(K) acts by changes of section
g·(P, ϕ) = P, ϕg1(these two actions are the same action if one takes into
account identification (2)), C×scales Dsuch that the coordinate thas weight 1.
We will later denote this C×as C×
when we want to emphasize that we use this
algebraic group and its natural action.
We will need actions by subgroups of this group, namely AGG(O)
G(K). It will also be useful to consider extended torus T=A×C×
, where the
C×
-part comes from the second term in the product G(K)⋊ C×
.
The canonical projection TC×
gives a character of Twhich we call
(this explains the subscript in the notation C×
). Then the weight of coordinate
ton Dis by the construction of the C×
-action.
Remark. We call the maximal torus of Gby Ato have notation similar to [MO],
i.e. Tis the maximal torus acting on the variety and Ais the subtorus of T
preserving the symplectic form.
STABLE ENVELOPES FOR SLICES OF THE AFFINE GRASSMANNIAN 5
The partial flag variety G/P(where Pis parabolic) has a well-known decom-
position by orbits of the B-action called Schubert cells. The affine Grassmannian
has a similar feature.
One can explicitly construct the fixed points of the A-action. Given a cochar-
acter λ:C×A, one can construct a map using natural inclusions
D×C×λ
AG
i.e. an element of G(K) which we denote by tλ. Projecting it naturally to Gr we
get an element [λ]Gr.
Using these elements we define
Grλ=G(O)·[λ]
as their orbits.
Let us present the main properties of these points and subspaces.
Proposition 2.1.
(1) GrA=F
λX(A)
{[λ]}.
(2) Moreover, GrT=GrA.
(3) For any wWone has Grwλ =Grλ.
(4) Gr =F
λX(A)+
Grλ.
(5) Grλ=F
µλ
µX(A)+
Grµ.
(6) As a G-variety, Grλis isomorphic to a the total space of a G-equivariant
vector bundle over the G-orbit G·[λ].
(7) As a G-variety, G·[λ]is a partial flag variety G/P
λwith parabolic P
λ
whose Lie algebra contains all roots αsuch that α, λ⟩ ≤ 0.
(8) D-scaling C×
in Tacts on Grλby scaling the fibers of the vector bundle
(6) with no zero weights.
(9) Grλis the smooth part of Grλ. In particular, Grλis smooth iff λis a
minuscule coweight or zero.
Proof. The main reference for most of the statements here is [BD]. Part (4) is 4.5.8
(see also 3.1.7 in [CG] for a finite analog). Part (5) is 4.5.12. Part (6) is Lemma
9.1.5(iii). Part (7) is 9.1.3. Part (8) is Remark 9.1.6. Part (9) follows from parts
(6) and (5).
For part (1) let us first show that for any A-cocharacter λthe point [λ] is
A-fixed. Ais commutative and AG(O), so for any aAwe have
a[λ] = atλG(O) = tλaG(O) = tλG(O)=[λ].
This gives one inclusion in (1). To prove the other inclusion, let pGrA. By (4)
there is a dominant coweight λ, such that pGrλ. Since pis A-fixed, it must be
over an A-fixed point in G/P
λ. The A-fixed points in G·[λ] = G/P
λare of the
摘要:

STABLEENVELOPESFORSLICESOFTHEAFFINEGRASSMANNIANIVANDANILENKOAbstract.TheaffineGrassmannianassociatedtoareductivegroupGisanaffineanalogueoftheusualflagvarieties.ItisarichsourceofPoissonva-rietiesandtheirsymplecticresolutions.ThesespacesareexamplesofconicalsymplecticresolutionsdualtotheNakajimaquiverv...

展开>> 收起<<
STABLE ENVELOPES FOR SLICES OF THE AFFINE GRASSMANNIAN IVAN DANILENKO.pdf

共71页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:71 页 大小:879.12KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-03

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 71
客服
关注