On the Role of Risk Perceptions in Cyber Insurance Contracts Shutian Liu and Quanyan Zhu

2025-05-02 0 0 607.19KB 6 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
On the Role of Risk Perceptions in Cyber Insurance
Contracts
Shutian Liu and Quanyan Zhu
Abstract—Risk perceptions are essential in cyber insurance
contracts. With the recent surge of information, human risk
perceptions are exposed to the influences from both beneficial
knowledge and fake news. In this paper, we study the role of the
risk perceptions of the insurer and the user in cyber insurance
contracts. We formulate the cyber insurance problem into a
principal-agent problem where the insurer designs the contract
containing a premium payment and a coverage plan. The risk
perceptions of the insurer and the user are captured by coherent
risk measures. Our framework extends the cyber insurance
problem containing a risk-neutral insurer and a possibly risk-
averse user, which is often considered in the literature. The
explicit characterizations of both the insurer’s and the user’s
risk perceptions allow us to show that cyber insurance has
the potential to incentivize the user to invest more on system
protection. This possibility to increase cyber security relies on
the facts that the insurer is more risk-averse than the user (in
a minimization setting) and that the insurer’s risk perception
is more sensitive to the changes in the user’s actions than the
user himself. We investigate the properties of feasible contracts
in a case study on the insurance of a computer system against
ransomware.
I. INTRODUCTION
Human risk perception plays an important role in cyber
insurance contracts. On the one hand, individuals who are
risk-averse tend to overreact to severe potential losses that are
not likely to happen. On the other hand, they are eager to
seek additional resources to defend against cyber losses. The
risk-sharing property of cyber insurance contracts that mitigates
the cyber losses of users depends on the user’s risk-aversion.
The cyber insurance market does not exist when the users are
risk-neutral [
1
]. In an era of information explosion, people
may either intend to adjust their risk attitudes according to
expert advice or be manipulated by fake news to reform they
risk preferences without awareness [
2
]. The instability of risk
perception can have essential impacts on the insurance market
and the resiliency of cyber systems. Therefore, there is a need
to study how users with different risk perceptions behave when
they face potential cyber losses and how the optimal insurance
plan should change according to the risk attitudes.
Linear contracts involving a prepaid premium and a coverage
plan are among the most considered contract models in the
cyber insurance market. The premium is a money transfer from
the user to the insurer for entering the contract and the coverage
plan describes the proportion of cyber losses covered by the
insurer. In a linear contract model, the insurer is often assumed
to be risk-neutral and evaluate her loss using expectations; the
user is set to exhibit risk-aversion. The risk-aversion of an
individual can be modeled by a nonlinear utility function [3],
[
4
]. The risk-aversion is captured by the fact that the utility
function is assumed to be increasing and concave in return.
There is a recent trend on the study risk quantification
adopting coherent risk measures (CRMs). The axiomatic
definition of CRMs maintains the generality of the risk
modeling and provides rich insights towards applications.
The dual representation of a CRM shows its robustness to
probabilistic uncertainty. Reformulation techniques [
5
], [
6
],
[
7
] have also enabled convenient and tractable computation
methods of risks modeled by various CRMs.
Protection Investment x
Coverage !
Premium q
Loss (1-!)"
Insurer
User
Cyber Risk "
Loss !"
Cyber Insurance
Decreased Cyber Risk
Increased
Protection Investment
Enhanced System Security
Risk Perception
Figure 1. Cyber insurance has the potential to enhance system security by
incentivizing the user to invest more on system protection, if the risk perception
of the insurer exhibits more risk-aversion and is more sensitive towards the
distributional shifts of the cyber losses.
We study the role of human risk perceptions in cyber
insurance using a holistic framework which incorporates the
modern risk modeling approach and a linear principal-agent
(P-A) model. In particular, we use CRMs to describe the
risk-aversion of the principal and the agent. The reason is
two-fold. First, CRMs allow us to investigate the probabilistic
distortion to the random cyber losses caused by human risk-
aversion. Second, cyber risks are challenging to quantify due
to the difficulty in transforming the cyber losses to monetary
losses. Therefore, the probabilistic robustness that CRMs
possess leads to reliable and safe estimations of cyber risks.
Our framework builds on the hidden-action linear contract
problem to capture the information asymmetry between the
insurer and the user. Specifically, the principal minimizes her
loss function by designing the contract containing a premium
and a coverage rate subject to the individual rationality (IR)
constraint which guarantees beneficial participation and the
incentive compatibility (IC) constraint which corresponds to the
rationality of the agent. Due to the IC constraint, the contract
problem appears in the form of a bilevel program. Though
a full-information counterpart to this problem where the IC
arXiv:2210.15010v1 [cs.CR] 26 Oct 2022
constraint is absent produces a lower optimal loss, the hidden-
information does not suffer from the moral hazard issue [
8
]. In
this work, we focus on the influence of risk measures on the
insurance. Hence, we do not consider additional nonlinearities
on top of the random cyber loss modeled by a random variable
endowed with a parametric distribution. The validity of linear
contracts follows from the monotonicity property of the solution
to general contract problems [8].
Hidden-action contract problems are challenging because
of the bilevel nature. However, leveraging the linearity of the
contract and the first-order approach, we can simplify the
problem and derive its optimality conditions. The conditions
allow us to characterize the coverage and the premium in terms
of the derivative of the risk of the user with respect to his
action. By choosing proper risk measures, practitioners can
obtain optimal contracts which satisfy desired properties.
One of the most essential features of the principal-agent
models lies in that the distribution of the random losses is
parametric in the agent’s action. In our framework, how the
risks perceived by the insurer and the user change according to
the user’ actions captures how sensitive the insurer and the user
are towards the parameterization. We show that when, compared
to the user’s risk perception, the insurer’s risk perception
exhibits more aversion to random cyber losses and is more
sensitive to the parameterization, cyber insurance can enhance
system security by incentivizing the protection investment of the
agent. These requirements suggest the following characteristics
of the insurer. First, the insurer, who bears the responsibility
in evaluating the system risks, should be able to estimate the
cyber losses more cautiously than the user. Second, aiming
to design an incentive contract, the insurer should possess a
higher level of awareness of how the actions from the user
influence the system risks stochastically than the user himself.
Our result enriches the literature by introducing the possibility
that cyber insurance can incentivize the user’s system protection
investment and hence enhance the overall system security.
This possibility is not observed in traditional cyber insurance
problems where the risk perceptions are captured by nonlinear
utility functions [1], [9], [10].
The paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we first
introduce the risk preference modeling, then we incorporate it
into the cyber insurance contract design problem. Section III
contains the analysis of the game. We discuss the roles of risk
perceptions in shaping the optimal contract and the relation
between risk sensitivity and system security. We use a case
study to further investigate the insurance contracts in Section
IV. Finally, Section V concludes the paper.
II. PROBLEM FORMULATION
In this section, we first introduce the definition of CRMs
and their analytical properties. Then, we introduce the cyber
insurance contract design problem with the risk preferences of
the insurer and the user described by CRMs.
A. Risk Preference Modeling
Consider the probability space
(Ξ,F)
of cyber loss samples
ξΞR+
endowed with the reference probability measure
P
. Let
Z:=Lp(Ξ,F,P)
denotes the space of random losses
Z:ΞR
with finite
p
-th order moment. The parameter
p
lives
in
[1,+)
. A risk measure
ρ
is a function
ZR
that assigns
a deterministic value to a random loss. Classic approaches to
risk modeling includes using the expected loss, the standard
deviation of the loss, the value-at-risk, and etc. These risk
metrics can come in handy in many real situations due to their
simplicity and straightforwardness of interpretation. However,
the classic risk metrics are lacking in the following two ways.
First, one risk metric cannot fully characterize the behavior
of a random loss. A simple example would be that using
the expectation to characterize the risk of a Gaussian random
loss has
50%
chance to fail when the randomness is realized.
Second, human risk perceptions are different across individuals.
According to [
3
], humans tend to distinguish between losses and
gains and are likely to perceive the true probability of random
events with biases. Hence, risk metrics should characterize
human behaviors beyond merely risk-neutrality.
In this paper, we will use CRMs to characterize the risk
sensitivities that the insurer and the user exhibit.
Definition 1
(Coherent Risk Measures [
11
])
.
A function
ρ:
ZR
is called a Coherent Risk Measure if for
Z,Z0Z
it
satisfies
(A1) Monotonicity:
ρ(Z)ρ(Z0)
if
Z(ξ)Z0(ξ)
for almost
everywhere ξΞ.
(A2) Convexity:
ρ(tZ + (1t)Z0)tρ(Z)+(1t)ρ(Z0)
for
t[0,1].
(A3) Translation equivariance: ρ(Z+a) = ρ(Z) + a if a R.
(A4) Positive homogeneity: ρ(tZ) = tρ(Z)if t 0.
One definition of risk-aversion [
12
] is referred to the fact
that the perceived risk is not smaller than the expectation of the
random loss, i.e.,
ρ[·]E[·]
. A convex risk measure captures
the risk-aversion of decision-makers in this sense.
A CRM captures the decision-maker’s robustness consid-
eration to probabilistic uncertainty due to the following dual
representation [11], [13]:
ρ[Z(ξ)] = sup
ζAZΞ
Z(ξ)ζ(ξ)dP(ξ),(1)
where
AZ
denotes the dual set associated with the risk
measure
ρθ
and contains probability density functions with
respect to the probability measure
P
. The set
Z
denotes the
dual space of
Z
defined by
Z:Lq(Ξ,F,P)
with
1
p+1
q=1
.
The optimization problem (1) admits an optimal solution since
the set Ais convex and compact when p[1,+)[13].
The following is an important property of a risk measure.
Definition 2.
(Law-invariance.) A risk measure
ρ:ZR
is
law-invariant with respect to the reference probability measure
P
, if
Z1,Z2Z
such that
P(Z1t) = P(Z2t)
for all
tR
,
then ρ(Z1) = ρ(Z2).
摘要:

OntheRoleofRiskPerceptionsinCyberInsuranceContractsShutianLiuandQuanyanZhuAbstract—Riskperceptionsareessentialincyberinsurancecontracts.Withtherecentsurgeofinformation,humanriskperceptionsareexposedtotheinuencesfrombothbenecialknowledgeandfakenews.Inthispaper,westudytheroleoftheriskperceptionsofth...

展开>> 收起<<
On the Role of Risk Perceptions in Cyber Insurance Contracts Shutian Liu and Quanyan Zhu.pdf

共6页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:6 页 大小:607.19KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 6
客服
关注