
On the Relative Distance of Entangled Systems in
Emergent Spacetime Scenarios
Guilherme Franzmann,1, 2, ∗Sebastian M. D. Jovancic,3, †and Matthew Lawson4, ‡
1Nordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University,
Hannes Alfvéns väg 12, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
2Basic Research Community for Physics e.V., Mariannenstraße 89, Leipzig, Germany
3KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University,
Hannes Alfvéns väg 12, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
4Savantic AB, Rosenlundsgatan 52, Stockholm, Sweden
(Dated: October 27, 2022)
Spacetime emergence from entanglement proposes an alternative to quantizing gravity and typ-
ically derives a notion of distance based on the amount of mutual information shared across sub-
systems. Albeit promising, this program still faces challenges to describe simple physical systems,
such as a maximally entangled Bell pair that is taken apart while preserving its entanglement. We
propose a solution to this problem: a reminder that quantum systems can have multiple sectors of
independent degrees of freedom, and that each sector can be entangled. Thus, while one sector can
decohere, and decrease the amount of total mutual information within the system, another sector,
e.g. spin, can remain entangled. We illustrate this with a toy model, showing that only within
the particles’ momentum uncertainty there can be considerably more entanglement than in the spin
sector for a single Bell pair. We finish by introducing some considerations about how spacetime
could be tested in the lab in the future.
I. INTRODUCTION
“Of course spacetime cannot be emergent from entanglement, as
we can place a Bell pair arbitrarily far apart from each other.”
– During a discussion session at QISS ’22 Conference.
A century has gone by since Planck discovered the
quantum-mechanical nature of our Universe. Since then,
the three fundamental interactions that mainly govern
the microscopic scales have been quantized. Together,
they compose the Standard Model of Particle Physics -
the most accurate theory ever devised by us. And gravity
does not fit in it. In spite of having its first mechanical
description introduced by Newton centuries before, the
program of quantizing gravity for arbitrarily high ener-
gies remains incomplete.
Similarly to Yukawa’s theory to describe the nuclear
force between nucleons mediated by pions, quantum gen-
eral relativity is a low-energy effective field theory [1]. As
Yukawa’s theory was superseded by quantum chromo-
dynamics, where more fundamental degrees of freedom
were introduced, the same is expected to happen with
gravity. Thus, the quantized degrees of freedom in quan-
tum general relativity, namely the spacetime fluctuations
parametrized by the metric field, will no longer be fun-
damental in the final quantum gravity theory.
Nonetheless, most attempts to reconcile gravity with
quantum mechanics have insisted on keeping these de-
grees of freedom one way or another. String the-
ory [2], the most prevalent approach to quantum grav-
ity, introduces other spacetime degrees of freedom that
∗guilherme.franzmann@su.se
†sebjov@kth.se
‡mmlawson@ucdavis.edu
parametrize the strings’ worldsheet. Meanwhile, some
other approaches, such as loop quantum gravity [3], de-
velop new ways of quantizing the same degrees of freedom
from general relativity. Still, the single most significant
insight since this program started came from Maldacena
in 1997 [4]. By introducing the anti-de Sitter/Conformal
Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, he showed
that a gravitational theory could be dual to a lower-
dimensional quantum mechanical theory without gravity.
Since then, evidence about the emergent nature of space-
time has piled up.
The research on spacetime emergence follows a long
thread that started with findings by Bekenstein [5], who
explored the thermodynamic properties of black holes
and related the entropy of a black hole to its surface
area. Later, Hawking [6] completed the thermodynami-
cal description by showing that black holes indeed emit
thermal radiation. Two decades later, the holographic
principle was introduced by ’t Hooft [7], stating that the
boundary of a bulk region of space encodes information
about its interior. Meanwhile, Jacobson [8] showed that
Einstein’s equation of General Relativity could be seen as
an equation of state resulting from the thermodynamic
limit of local Rindler causal horizons. Despite these de-
velopments, theories without gravity ab initio were still
lacking until Maldacena [4] proposed the AdS/CFT cor-
respondence. It established a holographic relationship
between AdS space and conformal field theories, also re-
ferred to as the gauge/gravity duality. Then, Ryu &
Takayanagi [9] showed that in an AdS space there is a di-
rect relationship between the entanglement entropy asso-
ciated with bulk regions separated by a boundary surface
where a conformal field theory is defined and the area of
this boundary. Finally, van Raamsdonk [10] extended
this relationship by suggesting that one could relate the
arXiv:2210.14875v1 [quant-ph] 26 Oct 2022