
the linear elasticity operator [3, 2, 21, 22, 18, 14, 20, 16, 17, 15]. [9, 15] cover a related
eigenvalue problem derived from stability analysis. In [3], the direct crack problem for half
space elasticity was analyzed under weaker regularity conditions (weaker than H1regular).
In [2], this direct problem was proved to be uniquely solvable in case of piecewise Lipschitz
elasticity coefficients and general elasticity tensors. Both [2] and [3] include a proof of
uniqueness for the related crack (or fault) inverse problem under appropriate assumptions.
[14] and [19] focus on the Lipschitz stability of the reconstruction of cracks based on the
assumption that only planar cracks are admissible. The seismic model introduced in [21]
was used in [22] to address a real life problem in geophysics consisting of identifying a fault
using GPS measurements of surface displacements. [18, 20] feature statistical numerical
methods for the reconstruction of cracks based on a Bayesian approach. In [16], a related
parallel accept/reject sampling algorithm was derived. The numerical method in [17] is
entirely different, it is based on deep learning.
Here, we analyze a direct and an inverse problem that generalize the Laplace based case to
the wave case. The waves considered here are time harmonic pressure waves and can be
modeled by an inhomogeneous Helmholtz equation. We can actually model heterogeneous
media by assuming that the wavenumber k2is an L∞function, as long as it is non-negative,
bounded away from zero, and equal to a constant k0outside a bounded set. In section 2, we
prove that the direct pressure wave problem in half space minus a crack is uniquely solvable
and well posed in the space of functions
{v∈H1
loc(R3−\Γ) : v
√1 + r2,∇v
√1 + r2,∂v
∂r −ik0v∈L2(R3−\Γ)},
where Γ is the crack and ris the distance to the origin. The proof of uniqueness for the inverse
problem relies on unique continuation for elliptic equations from Cauchy data. The earliest
such continuation results relied on properties of analytic functions. Later, Nirenberg proved
that for second order PDEs whose leading term is the Laplacian, it suffices to assume that
solutions are C1with piecewise continuous second derivatives for the unique continuation
property to hold [13].This result was further improved by Aronszajn et al. where in [1] it was
extended to such PDEs with only Lipschitz coefficients. Unfortunately, demanding Lipschitz
continuity is impractical in applications since it does not even cover the piecewise constant
case. More recently, Barcelo et al. [4] proved a stronger result. In particular, their unique
continuation result implies that a solution to the pressure wave equation (∆ + k2)u= 0 in
an open set of R3satisfies the unique continuation property if k2is in L∞
loc(R3). This unique
continuation property will help us show in section 2.2 a uniqueness result for the pressure
wave inverse problem in the half-space {x:x3<0}minus a crack: if Γi,i= 1,2 are two
cracks where the forcing terms gi,i= 1,2 defining pressure discontinuity across Γihave full
support in Γileading to the solution uiof the forward problem, if R3\Γ1∪Γ2is connected,
and the Cauchy data for u1and u2are the same on a relatively open set of the top boundary
{x:x3= 0}then Γ1= Γ2and g1=g2.
In section 3, we show counterexamples where uniqueness for the crack inverse problem fails
if R3\Γ1∪Γ2is not connected. In a first class of counterexamples, Γ1∪Γ2is a sphere
and we use the first Neumann eigenvalue for the Laplace operator inside an open ball that
is odd about the equator. Such a function is necessarily zero on the equator and thus the
values on the top half sphere can be extended by zero to the lower half sphere without losing
2