13
TeV
. In 2011 and 2012 data samples corresponding to 1
fb−1
and 2
fb−1
were collected
at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8
TeV
, respectively, and from 2015 to 2018 a data
sample corresponding to 6
fb−1
was collected at 13
TeV
. Due to the different centre-of-mass
energies and due to different detector settings, the analysis is performed separately for
the two data-taking periods 2011–2012 (Run 1) and 2015–2018 (Run 2), combining both
results in the end.
The measurement of the ratio of branching fractions relies on the calculation of the
ratio of selection efficiencies and the determination of the signal yields for the two decays.
Therefore, the analysis begins with the selection of signal and control mode candidates in
Sec. 3 and continues with the extraction of the
B0
s
and
B0
yields using mass fits in Sec. 4.
The systematic uncertainties are evaluated in Sec. 5 and the final calculation of the ratio
of branching fractions is presented in Sec. 6.
2 Detector and simulation
The
LHCb
detector [18, 19] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the
pseudorapidity
range 2
< η <
5, designed for the study of particles containing
b
or
c
quarks. The detector includes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-
strip vertex detector surrounding the proton-proton (
pp
) interaction region, a large-area
silicon-strip detector located upstream of a dipole magnet with a bending power of about
4
Tm
, and three stations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes placed downstream
of the magnet. The tracking system provides a measurement of the momentum,
p
, of
charged particles with a relative uncertainty that varies from 0.5% at low momentum to
1.0% at 200
GeV/c
. The minimum distance of a track to a primary
pp
collision vertex (
PV
),
the impact parameter (
IP
), is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29
/pT
)
µm
, where
pT
is
the component of the momentum transverse to the beam, in
GeV/c
. Different types of
charged hadrons are distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov
detectors. Photons, electrons and hadrons are identified by a calorimeter system con-
sisting of scintillating-pad and preshower detectors, an electromagnetic and a hadronic
calorimeter. Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron and
multiwire proportional chambers.
Simulation is used to calculate the selection efficiencies and to determine the shapes of
the mass distributions. In the simulation,
pp
collisions are generated using
Pythia
[20]
with a specific
LHCb
configuration [21]. The
EvtGen
package [22] is used to decay
unstable particles, with final-state radiation generated using
Photos
[23]. The interaction
of the generated particles with the detector, and its response, are implemented using the
Geant4 toolkit [24, 25] as described in Ref. [26].
3 Selection of candidates
The online event selection is performed by a trigger [27,28], which consists of a hardware
stage, based on information from the calorimeter and muon systems, followed by a software
stage, which applies a full event reconstruction. At the hardware trigger stage, events are
required to have a muon with high
pT
or a hadron, photon or electron with high transverse
energy in the calorimeters. The software trigger requires a two-, three- or four-track
secondary vertex with a significant displacement from any primary
pp
interaction vertex.
2