Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate uctuations in a 2D Ising model Daniel S. Seara

2025-05-02 0 0 1.98MB 16 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate
fluctuations in a 2D Ising model
Daniel S. Seara
James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, USA
Akash Piya
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria VA, USA
A. Pasha Tabatabai
E-mail: To whom correspondence should be addressed:
tabatabai@seattleu.edu
Department of Physics, Seattle University, Seattle WA, USA
Abstract. Motivated by the anisotropic interactions between fish, we implement
spatially anisotropic and therefore non-reciprocal interactions in the 2D Ising model.
First, we show that the model with non-reciprocal interactions alters the system
critical temperature away from that of the traditional 2D Ising model. Further,
local perturbations to the magnetization in this out-of-equilibrium system manifest
themselves as traveling waves of spin states along the lattice, also seen in a mean-
field model of our system. The speed and directionality of these traveling waves are
controllable by the orientation and magnitude of the non-reciprocal interaction kernel
as well as the proximity of the system to the critical temperature.
arXiv:2210.11229v3 [cond-mat.soft] 5 Apr 2023
Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate fluctuations in a 2D Ising model 2
1. Introduction
When two objects come into contact with each other, the macroscopic forces that
each generate on the other are described by Newton’s Third Law and are equal in
magnitude. While the reciprocity of this type of interaction is common, there are many
instances where interactions between objects are non-reciprocal and lead to interesting
behaviors. For example, metamaterials that exhibit broken symmetries in the bonds
between constituents yield asymmetric responses to mechanical [1,2,3] and optical
waves [4,5] as well as fluid/solid behavior [6,7]. Non-reciprocal interactions are also
used as design principles for sensor optimization [8].
Hallmark examples of non-reciprocal interactions occur within the collective
behavior of animal groups such as locusts, birds, and fish. In these systems,
visual information differences between animals lead to this non-reciprocal interaction.
While incorporating non-reciprocal interactions are not required to capture flocking
behavior [9], there is a recent push towards understanding the effects of non-reciprocal
interactions on phase behavior [10,11,12] and the non-trivial motion of flocking
objects [13].
In particular, we are interested in how fluctuations in the local polarization within a
flock are propagated through space as a consequence of these non-reciprocal interactions.
To this end, we simplify the problem and study non-reciprocal interactions within a 2D
Ising model that are motivated by the anisotropic field of view within animals such as
fish, consistent with recent efforts to understand the effects of non-reciprocal interactions
within the continuum Vicsek model [10,12]. This model is not equivalent to the
active Ising model [14,15] since objects are not free to move on the lattice and lack
self-propulsion. As a consequence, our model decouples the non-equilibrium effects of
introducing a non-reciprocal interaction and active energy consumption. We note that
most non-reciprocal interactions within studies of flocking focus on so-called ‘vision-
cones’ where object orientation influences interactions. Our interaction is a simplified
version of a vision-cone which does not change orientation.
Our results are presented in three parts. First, the model is introduced and
the influence of the non-reciprocal interaction on the phase behavior of the system
is described in detail. Comparisons are made to the equilibrium 2D Ising model. Then,
we characterize the spatial propagation of fluctuations that originate from the presence
of this non-reciprocal interaction. We introduce a mean-field model which predicts the
propagation of spin fluctuations under these parity-breaking interactions. We show
that this propagation is robust to changes in the algorithm used to generate the system
dynamics. Finally, we find that the propagation velocity is maximized near the critical
temperature.
Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate fluctuations in a 2D Ising model 3
1 2 3 4
T
0
0.5
1
M/N
a
1234
T
0
0.5
1
M/N
b
1 2 3 4
T
0
0.5
1
M/N
c
2.0 2.5 3.0
T
0
30
60
¬/N
d
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
a
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
b
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
c
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
d
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
Δ
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
a
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
b
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
c
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
d
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
0.0 2.5 5.0
T
0.0
0.5
1.0
M/N
Δ
Δ
Figure 1. Size and Offset Effects on System Magnetization. (a) Magnetization
per spin M/N as a function of temperature Tfor lattices with L= 8 (red), L= 16
(black), L= 32 (blue), and L= 64 (magenta). (a-inset) Representation of a standard
Ising Model interaction kernel. Neighbors of the blue cell are defined as the four red
lattice sites. (b) Magnetization per spin as a function of temperature for offset ∆ = 2
with symbol colors equivalent to (a). (b-inset) Representation of an non-reciprocal
interaction kernel with an offset ∆ = 2 lattice sites. Arrows point in the direction of
increasing system size. (c) Magnetization per spin M/N as a function of temperature
Tfor lattices of size L= 64 at different values of offset ∆ = 0 (red), ∆ = 2 (black),
∆ = 4 (blue), ∆ = 8 (magenta), and ∆ = 10 (cyan). (d) Magnetic susceptibility per
spin χ/N for data in (c).
2. Methods
We consider a 2D Ising model on a square lattice of dimension L×Lwith N=L2
spins where the system at a time tis in a configuration denoted by the vector s(t)
with elements si=±1, where iZ2indexes the lattice site [16]. In order to generate
spin dynamics on the lattice, we use the energy of an individual spin si, calculated as
[17,18,19]
Ei(s) = siX
j
Jijsj(1)
where Jij is an element of an interaction matrix which couples spins iand j.
Note that this is related, but distinct, from the traditional Ising model Hamiltonian,
given by E= (PiEi)/2 [20]. Importantly, while Ei(s) is not an energy functional, we
nevertheless have ∆E= ∆Eiwhen Jij =Jji (see Appendix A for details). When this
symmetry condition on the interaction matrix is satisfied, we call the system reciprocal.
Otherwise, if Jij 6=Jji, we call the system non-reciprocal [21].
Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate fluctuations in a 2D Ising model 4
To begin, we study an equilibrium reciprocal Ising model where spins iand j
interact with strength Jij =Jif they are nearest neighbors, otherwise Jij = 0 (Fig. 1a-
inset). We can write the interaction matrix as
Jij =J(δiˆex,j +δi+ˆex,j +δiˆey,j +δi+ˆey,j ).(2)
In the above, ˆeαdenotes the unit vector in the αdirection, with α∈ {x, y}. Unless
otherwise stated, we set J= 1.
Lattices are placed in contact with a heat bath at a temperature T, with
units of the Boltzmann constant kB(Supplemental Movie 1). Assuming periodic
boundary conditions, the lattices are evolved towards their thermodynamic equilibrium
configurations using a Metropolis Monte Carlo method (Appendix A). Briefly, individual
spins in the lattice are chosen at random and the energy cost/gain of flipping the spin as
given by the variation of Eq. 1determines the probability of flipping the spin as shown
by
P(sFis) = min 1, eβEi(3)
where Fiis an operator that takes si7→ −siand ∆Eiis given by Eq. A.3 in Appendix
A[22].
We define a ‘sweep’ as a proxy for time; in a single sweep of a lattice with Nlattice
sites, Nsites are randomly selected sequentially and have the possibility of flipping their
spin. Systems are brought to a steady-state configuration and ensemble measurements
of the system magnetization are made of independent configurations (Appendix B).
For a given lattice, we calculate the system magnetization from the sum of all spins
si,M=Pisi, which exhibits the expected temperature and system-size dependence
previously described (Fig. 1a) [22]. Since the s7→ −ssymmetry is not broken by the
existence of an external field, we quote the absolute value of the magnetization.
Next, we amend the traditional Ising model interaction matrix and introduce a
non-reciprocal interaction (Jij 6=Jji) in Eq. 1. Inspired by the non-local information
processing of active systems, such as fish within a school or starlings within a
flock [23,24,25,10], we define an offset vector Z2that represents a spatial
translation of the interaction kernel (Fig. 1b-inset),
= ∆xˆex+ ∆yˆey,(4)
where ∆αZare integers. The interaction matrix’s elements are now given by
Jij =J(δi+ˆex,j +δi++ˆex,j +δi+ˆey,j +δi++ˆey,j )(5)
We choose to keep constant and uniform throughout space, specifically ˆex, and
∆ is not dependent on the sign of the lattice spin. These unidirectional interactions lead
to qualitatively similar temperature and size-dependence of the system magnetization
(Fig. 1b). Note that the traditional Ising model is represented by ∆ = 0, and we keep a
constant number of interactions between spins (4) to keep the connectivity of the lattice
constant for all values of ∆.
摘要:

Non-reciprocalinteractionsspatiallypropagateuctuationsina2DIsingmodelDanielS.SearaJamesFranckInstitute,UniversityofChicago,ChicagoIL,USAAkashPiyaThomasJe ersonHighSchoolforScienceandTechnology,AlexandriaVA,USAA.PashaTabatabaiE-mail:Towhomcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressed:tabatabai@seattleu.eduDepartme...

展开>> 收起<<
Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate uctuations in a 2D Ising model Daniel S. Seara.pdf

共16页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:16 页 大小:1.98MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 16
客服
关注