Nonparametric drift estimation from diffusions with correlated brownian motions

2025-05-02 0 0 366.59KB 28 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
arXiv:2210.13173v2 [math.ST] 11 Jul 2023
Nonparametric drift estimation from diusions with correlated brownian motions
Fabienne COMTEa, Nicolas MARIEb,
aUniversit´e Paris Cit´e, CNRS, MAP5 UMR 8145, F-75006 Paris, France
bLaboratoire Modal’X, Universit´e Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, France
Abstract
In the present paper, we consider that Ndiusion processes X1,...,XNare observed on [0,T], where Tis fixed and
Ngrows to infinity. Contrary to most of the recent works, we no longer assume that the processes are independent.
The dependency is modeled through correlations between the Brownian motions driving the diusion processes. A
nonparametric estimator of the drift function, which does not use the knowledge of the correlation matrix, is proposed
and studied. Its integrated mean squared risk is bounded and an adaptive procedure is proposed. Few theoretical tools
to handle this kind of dependency are available, and this makes our results new. Numerical experiments show that the
procedure works in practice.
Keywords: Correlated Brownian motions, Diusion processes, Model selection, Projection least squares estimator.
2020 MSC: Primary 62G07, Secondary 62M05
1. Introduction
We start by describing our model. Consider the diusion process X=(Xt)t[0,T], defined by
Xt=x0+Zt
0
b(Xs)ds +Zt
0
σ(Xs)dBs;t[0,T],(1)
where x0R,B=(Bt)t[0,T]is a Brownian motion, b:RRis a Lipschitz continuous function, and σ:RRis
a bounded Lipschitz continuous function. Now, let B1,...,BNbe NN/{0}copies of Bsuch that
E(Bi
sBk
t)=Ri,k(st) ; i,k∈ {1,...,N},s,t[0,T],(2)
where R=(Ri,k)i,kis a correlation matrix. Note that, thanks to the (stochastic) integration by parts formula, the depen-
dence condition (2) on B1,...,BNimplies that, for every i,k∈ {1,...,N},dhBi,Bkit=Ri,kdt, with Ri,i=1. Finally,
consider Xi:=I(x0,Bi) for every i∈ {1,...,N}, where I(.) is the Itˆo map associated to Equation (1). In the present
paper, we consider that these Ndiusion processes X1,...,XNare observed on [0,T], where Tis fixed and Ngrows
to infinity, and our aim is to estimate nonparametrically the drift function b(.).
In the case of independent Brownian motions, that is R=IN(the N×Nidentity matrix), projection least squares
estimator have been studied in Comte and Genon-Catalot [7] for continuous time observations, in Denis el al. [14] for
discrete time (with small step) observations with a classification purpose in the parametric setting, and in Denis et al.
[15] in the nonparametric context, for instance. Marie and Rosier [20] propose a kernel based Nadaraya-Watson esti-
mator of the drift function b, with bandwidth selection relying on the Penalization Comparison to Overfitting (PCO)
criterion recently introduced by Lacour et al. [18]. Still in the case R=IN, Comte and Marie [12] investigate the
properties of the projection least squares estimator of the drift when Bis a fractional Brownian motion.
Dependency is often encountered in recent works in the context of stochastic systems of Ninteracting particles, with
Corresponding author. Email address: n.marie@parisnanterre.fr
Preprint submitted to Journal of Multivariate Analysis July 12, 2023
recent nonparametric drift estimators proposals in Della Maestra and Homann [13], Belomestny et al. [3] or Comte
and Genon-Catalot [9]. These kinds of models are related to physics. We rather have in mind economic or financial
models. For instance, in Duellmann et al. [16], the authors consider a portfolio of Nhomogenous firms such that the
asset value Xi
tat time tof the i-th firm is modeled by Merton’s model (see [21]) dXi
t=µXi
tdt +σXi
tdBi
twith Xi
0=X0,
which corresponds to (1) with b(x)=µxand σ(x)=σx. Intending to capture the dependency between the firms, they
also assume that dBi
t=ρdWt+p1ρdWi
t, where Wis a common systematic risk factor,Wiis a firm-specific risk
factor and ρ[0,1]. This corresponds to a particular matrix R, precisely Ri,k=ρfor i,k(and Ri,i=1), so that one
single parameter ρrepresents the so-called asset correlation. This model has been considered in e.g. Bush et al. [4],
for the more mathematical purpose of studying the limit of the empirical distribution of the Xi
ts (see also references
therein). Our extension from specific geometric Brownian motion to general nonparametric diusion (1), and from
one single correlation parameter to a general matrix representation, is therefore standard in both respects. This context
has nevertheless never been considered before up to our knowledge. Let us emphasize that our aim is not to estimate
R, but to exhibit conditions on it such that b(.) can be estimated with performance near of the independent setting.
In our framework, Tis fixed, and Nis large. Our results are nonasymptotic, but the idea is that Ngrows to in-
finity. We fix a subset Iof Rand build a collection of projection least squares estimators of bI=b1Iwhere Iis
compact or not. The estimators are defined by their coecients on an orthonormal basis of L2(I), ϕ1,...,ϕm, result-
ing from a standard least squares computation. Precisely, we consider the estimator of the drift function bminimizing
the objective function γN(τ)
τ7−γN(τ) :=1
NT
N
X
i=1 ZT
0
τ(Xi
s)2ds 2ZT
0
τ(Xi
s)dXi
s!(3)
on the m-dimensional function space Sm=span{ϕ1,...m}. The first part of γN(τ) involves a quantity
kτk2
N:=1
NT
N
X
i=1ZT
0
τ(Xi
s)2ds,
which is considered as the squared empirical norm of the function τ. These estimators are the same as in Comte and
Genon-Catalot [7], but their study is made significantly more dicult by the dependency context. We do not have at
our disposal any coupling method nor any transformation leading to a simpler system; in particular, applying R1/2to
the system does not bring any simplification because of a ”widespreading of the components of the process. Tropp’s
deviation inequalities used in the independent context (see Tropp [24], Matrix Chernov Inequality, Theorem 1.1 and
Matrix Bernstein Inequality, Theorem 1.4), which allow to consider the empirical norm and its expectation (an integral
norm, thus) as equivalent with high probability, no longer apply. Martingale properties still are useful, and we turn to
Azuma’s matrix deviation inequality (see Tropp [24], Theorem 7.1), which however requires to set sparsity conditions
on R(see Assumption 3). This equivalence property between empirical and weighted integral norms is the key of the
rigorous study of the risk of the drift estimator, and the correlation matrix is therefore at the heart of the proofs.
The plan of the paper is the following. A first parametric example motivates the model and the way of estimating
a drift parameter in Section 2. The general nonparametric drift estimator is defined in Section 3 and a risk bound on
a fixed projection space is proved. Adaptive estimation is studied in Section 4 and the whole procedure is illustrated
through simulations in Section 5. Lastly, proofs are gathered in Section 6.
2. Preliminary motivation and example in the parametric framework
This preliminary section deals with the geometric model described in the introduction, in the parametric frame-
work, in order to motivate our investigations. Similarly to Duellmann et al. [16], consider Nrisky assets of same
nature and of prices processes X1, . . . , XNobserved on the time interval [0,T]. Since these assets are of same nature,
to model their prices by dXi
t=µXi
tdt +σXi
tdBi
twith µRand σ > 0 not depending on i∈ {1,...,N}is realistic, but
it is also very realistic to consider that B1,...,BNmay be dependent, through the correlation matrix described above.
2
Let us compute the quadratic risk of the least squares estimator b
θNof θ=µσ2/2 in this special case. Since we can
write that Xi
t=x0exp(Yi
t) with Yi
t=θt+σBi
tfor every i∈ {1,...,N}and t[0,T], we set
b
θN=1
NT
N
X
i=1
Yi
T=θ+σ
NT
N
X
i=1
Bi
T.
Then,
E(|b
θNθ|2)=σ2
N2T2
N
X
i=1
E(|Bi
T|2)+X
i,k
E(Bi
TBk
T)
=σ2
NT +σ2
N2TX
i,k
Ri,k=σ2
NT 1+1
NX
i,k
Ri,k.
This means that the rate of convergence of b
θNis of order
V:=1
N+1
N2X
i,k
Ri,k.
We note that if Ri,k=ρfor all i,k, then the estimator is not consistent. This would be the same if all the coecients
of Rwere positive and only bounded by a constant ρ > 0. However, if we set a sparsity condition by saying that R
is block-diagonal with blocks of size (less than) k0, and if we assume that all nonzero coecients are equal to (or
bounded by) ρ, then Pi,kRi,k6k0ρN. So, k0ρis the loss in risk due to dependency, while the rate remains O(1/N).
Referring to the firms model of Duellmann et al. [16] and Bush et al.[4], this means for instance that for a large N,
dependent firms have to be grouped as several independent sets aggregated in the global model.
Another way to model the dependency with few parameters is to assume that
dBi
t=adWi
t+1adWi+1
t,
where W1,...,WN+1are independent Brownian motions and a[0,1]. This is a way of saying that each firm is
correlated to the following one in the list. In that case,
Ri,i+1=Ri,i1=pa(1 a),Ri,i=1,Ri,k=0 for |ki|>1;
and then
V=1
N 1+2 11
N!pa(1 a)!
has order O(1/N). Note that this matrix is sparse in the sense of Assumption 3 below.
Our purpose is to show that, at least for some special dependence schemes on B1,...,BN, the variance term of the
projection (nonparametric) least squares estimator of b(.) introduced in the following section is at most of order
1
N1+1
NX
i,k|Ri,k|.
It is noteworthy that the estimator b
θNis the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) when X1,...,XNare independent,
while the MLE in our dependent setting would involve – and thus require the complete knowledge of – the matrix R
(more specifically, its inverse). In the present strategy, the knowledge of Ris not required, which is interesting and
may justify a loss of eciency.
3
3. A projection least squares estimator of the drift function
3.1. The objective function
Set NT:=[NT ]+1 and let fTbe the density function defined by
fT(x) :=1
TZT
0
ps(x0,x)ds ;xR,
where ps(x0, .) is the density with respect to Lebesgue’s measure of the probability distribution of Xsfor every
s(0,T]. Let us consider the projection space Sm:=span{ϕ1,...,ϕm}, where ϕ1,...,ϕNTare continuous func-
tions from Iinto Rsuch that (ϕ1, . . . , ϕNT) is an orthonormal family in L2(I,dx), and IRis a non-empty interval.
We recall now that the objective function τ∈ Sm7→ γN(τ) is defined by (3), where m∈ {1,...,NT}. We choose a
contrast which is the same as in the independent case. Note that for the nonparametric estimation of the drift function
from Nobserved paths, even in the independent case, least squares and maximum likelihood strategies do not match.
Indeed, the likelihood would involve weights σ(Xi
s)2inside all integrals. In the dependent case, there would also be
the matrix R1to take into account. Even if both σ(.) and Rcan be considered as known, it is interesting not to need
them to compute the drift estimator. In particular, the step to discrete time high frequency data is then much simpler.
Since the strategy works in the independent case, we can hope that if the correlations are not too strong, then the
strategy remains relevant.
Remark. For any τ∈ Sm,
E(γN(τ)) =1
TZT
0
E(|τ(Xs)b(Xs)|2)ds 1
TZT
0
E(b(Xs)2)ds
=Z
−∞
(τ(x)b(x))2fT(x)dx Z
−∞
b(x)2fT(x)dx.
Then, the more τis close to b, the smaller E(γN(τ)). For this reason, the estimator of bminimizing γN(.) is studied in
this paper.
3.2. The projection least squares estimator and some related matrices
In this section, mis a fixed integer in {1,...,NT}. We consider the estimator
b
bm:=arg min
τ∈Sm
γN(τ) (4)
of b, if it exists and is unique. Since Sm=span{ϕ1,...m}, there exist msquare integrable random variablesb
θ1,...,b
θm
such that
b
bm=
m
X
j=1b
θjϕj.
Then,
γN(b
bm)=1
NT
N
X
i=12
m
X
=1b
θZT
0
ϕj(Xi
s)ϕ(Xi
s)ds 2ZT
0
ϕj(Xi
s)dXi
sj∈{1,...,m}
.
Let
b
Ψm:=1
NT
N
X
i=1ZT
0
ϕj(Xi
s)ϕ(Xi
s)dsj,ℓ∈{1,...,m}
and
b
Xm:=1
NT
N
X
i=1ZT
0
ϕj(Xi
s)dXi
sj∈{1,...,m}
.
4
Therefore, by (4) and if b
Ψmis invertible, necessarily
b
Θm:=(b
θ1,...,b
θm)=b
Ψ1
mb
Xm,
where Mdenotes the transpose of the matrix M.
Remarks:
1. We can write b
Ψm=(hϕj, ϕiN)j,ℓ, where
hϕ, ψiN:=1
NT
N
X
i=1ZT
0
ϕ(Xi
s)ψ(Xi
s)ds
for every measurable functions ϕand ψfrom Rinto itself.
2. The following useful decomposition holds: b
Xm=(hb, ϕjiN)
j+b
Em, where
b
Em:=1
NT
N
X
i=1ZT
0
σ(Xi
s)ϕj(Xi
s)dBi
s
j∈{1,...,m}
.
Let us introduce the two following deterministic matrices related to the previous random ones:
Ψm:=E(b
Ψm)=(hϕj, ϕifT)j,ℓ, where h., .ifTis the scalar product in L2(I,fT(x)dx).
Ψm:=NT E(b
Emb
E
m).
Note that under the following assumption, Comte and Genon-Catalot established in [7] (see Lemma 1) that Ψmis
invertible.
Assumption 1. The ϕjs satisfy the three following conditions:
1. (ϕ1,...,ϕm)is an orthonormal family of L2(I,dx).
2. The ϕj’s are bounded, continuously derivable, and have bounded derivatives.
3. There exist x1,...,xmI such that det[(ϕj(x))j,ℓ],0.
Let us conclude this section with the following suitable bound on the trace of Ψ1/2
mΨmΨ1/2
m. To that aim, we define
the following quantity associated with the basis:
L(m) :=1sup
xI
m
X
j=1
ϕj(x)2.
Lemma 1. Under Assumption 1, for σbelonging to L2(R,fT(x)dx)but possibly unbounded,
trace(Ψ1/2
mΨmΨ1/2
m)6c1L(m)kΨ1
mkop 1+1
NX
i,k|Ri,k|(5)
with
c1=Z
−∞
σ(x)2fT(x)dx.
If in addition σis bounded, then
trace(Ψ1/2
mΨmΨ1/2
m)6mkσk2
1+1
NX
i,k|Ri,k|.(6)
5
摘要:

arXiv:2210.13173v2[math.ST]11Jul2023NonparametricdriftestimationfromdiffusionswithcorrelatedbrownianmotionsFabienneCOMTEa,NicolasMARIEb,∗aUniversit´eParisCit´e,CNRS,MAP5UMR8145,F-75006Paris,FrancebLaboratoireModal’X,Universit´eParisNanterre,Nanterre,FranceAbstractInthepresentpaper,weconsiderthatNdiffu...

展开>> 收起<<
Nonparametric drift estimation from diffusions with correlated brownian motions.pdf

共28页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:28 页 大小:366.59KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 28
客服
关注