
Non-Newtonian fluid–structure interaction: Flow of a viscoelastic
Oldroyd-B fluid in a deformable channel
Evgeniy Boykoa,b,∗,1, Ivan C. Christova
aSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
bDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Fluid–structure interaction
Viscoelasticity
Oldroyd-B fluid
Lubrication theory
Pressure drop
Microfluidics
ABSTRACT
We analyze the steady non-Newtonian fluid–structure interaction between the flow of an Oldroyd-B
fluid and a deformable channel. Specifically, we provide a theoretical framework for calculating the
leading-order effect of the fluid’s viscoelasticity on the flow rate–pressure drop relation and on the
deformation of the channel’s elastic wall. We first identify the characteristic scales and dimension-
less parameters governing the fluid–structure interaction in slender and shallow channels. Applying
the lubrication approximation for the flow and employing a perturbation expansion in powers of the
Deborah number , we derive a closed-form expression for the pressure as a function of the non-
uniform shape of the channel in the weakly viscoelastic limit up to O(). Coupling the hydrodynamic
pressure to the elastic deformation, we provide the leading-order effect of the interplay between the
viscoelasticity of the fluid and the compliance of the channel on the pressure and deformation fields, as
well as on the flow rate–pressure drop relation. For the flow-rate-controlled regime and in the weakly
viscoelastic limit, we show analytically that both the compliance of the deforming top wall and the
viscoelasticity of the fluid decrease the pressure drop. Furthermore, we reveal a trade-off between the
influence of compliance of the channel and the fluid’s viscoelasticity on the deformation. While the
channel’s compliance increases the deformation, the fluid’s viscoelasticity decreases it.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) be-
tween viscous fluids and the soft deformable configurations
they flow through has received considerable attention in the
scientific community due to its relevance to microfluidic,
lab-on-a-chip, and soft robotics applications [1,2,3,4]. FSI
is not limited to Newtonian fluids, and it arises in various
microfluidic applications involving complex fluids, such as
ones containing proteins, colloidal dispersions, nucleic acids,
or polymeric solutions [5,6,7,8,9]. In these cases, the in-
terplay between the compliance of the confining boundaries
and the complex rheological behavior of the non-Newtonian
fluids involved affects the FSI in new ways that have not been
fully understood. Specifically, the rheological behavior of
the fluid is featured in the deformation of the soft fluidic con-
duit, as well as in the relationship between the pressure drop
Δand the volumetric flow rate [4].
Table 1lists a chronological selection of previous work
on the steady fluid-structure interaction between complex
non-Newtonian fluids and deformable configurations. From
this table, we conclude that the main focus of the previ-
ous theoretical studies to date has been on shear-dependent
power-law fluids. However, beyond shear thinning, complex
fluids are characterized by other rheological features such as
viscoelasticity, and thus, it is of fundamental and practical
∗Corresponding author
eboyko@purdue.edu ( Evgeniy Boyko); christov@purdue.edu (
Ivan C. Christov)
ORCID(s): 0000-0002-9202-5154 ( Evgeniy Boyko);
0000-0001-8531-0531 ( Ivan C. Christov)
1Present address: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Tech-
nion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel; evg-
boyko@technion.ac.il
importance to understand how these features affect the FSI.
Recently, Ramos-Arzola & Bautista [17] studied theo-
retically the fluid–structure interaction between a simplified
Phan-Thien–Tanner (PTT) fluid [18,19] flow and a slen-
der and shallow deformable microchannel. Using lubrica-
tion theory and linear elasticity and neglecting the solvent
contribution, Ramos-Arzola & Bautista [17] derived an im-
plicit nonlinear first-order ordinary differential equation for
the flow rate–pressure relation, which depends on the com-
pliance parameter and the product PTT 2, where PTT is
the extensibility parameter of the PTT model, and is the
Weissenberg number defined in Sec. 2.1. For a fixed flow
rate, their results predicted a decrease in the pressure drop
with increasing PTT 2. However, such a reduction in the
pressure drop arises due to shear-thinning effects of the PTT
model, which are manifested when PTT 2increases, and
is consistent with results of previous theoretical studies em-
ploying the simpler shear-thinning power-law model [14].
Moreover, for PTT = 0, when the PTT model corresponds
to the Oldroyd-B model, the solution of Ramos-Arzola &
Bautista [17] for the − Δrelation reduces to the Newto-
nian relations derived by Christov et al. [20] and Shidhore
& Christov [21], which are independent of the fluid’s vis-
coelasticity. Previous investigations of an Oldroyd-B fluid
in a rigid but non-uniformly shaped channel [22] showed
that the Oldroyd-B model’s flow differs from a Newtonian
one, which introduces viscoelastic corrections to the pres-
sure drop. Thus, one should anticipate that the viscoelastic-
ity of the complex fluid affects the fluid–structure interac-
tion, even under the Oldroyd-B model.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the fluid–structure
interaction between a constant-shear-viscosity viscoelastic
(Boger) fluid and a three-dimensional deformable channel
E. Boyko and I. C. Christov: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 1 of 12
arXiv:2210.13268v2 [physics.flu-dyn] 23 Jan 2023