
4
averaging over different noise realizations. GSI implies
that surface height values are statistically correlated for
distances smaller than a correlation length ξ(t) which
increases with time as a power law, ξ(t)∼t1/z, where
zis the so-called dynamic exponent. Such an increase
takes place until ξ(t) reaches a value comparable to L,
which results in the width saturating at a steady-state,
size-dependent value W(L, t Lz)∼Lα. Here, αis
the so-called roughness exponent, which is related with
the fractal dimension of the interface profile h(x, t). In
a wide variety of physical contexts and conditions, the
global roughness satisfies the Family-Vicsek (FV) scaling
Ansatz [7–9, 59]
W(L, t) = tβf(L/ξ(t)),(8)
where the scaling function f(y)∼yαfor y1, while
f(y) reaches a constant value for y1. The ratio
β=α/z is known as the growth exponent, and character-
izes the short-time behavior of the roughness, W(t)∼tβ.
Notably, the FV Ansatz is verified by classical models of
equilibrium critical dynamics [11]. Away from equilib-
rium, it is also verified by representatives of important
universality classes of kinetic roughening, like those of the
KPZ and EW equations, which are characterized by the
set of (α, z) exponent values and their dependence on the
substrate dimension d[7–9]. In this sense, kinetic rough-
ening extends classical equilibrium critical dynamics far
from equilibrium [11].
Beyond global quantities like W(t), the GSI occurring
in kinetic roughening systems also impacts the behavior
of correlation functions. A particularly useful one is the
height-difference correlation function,
G(r, t)≡ h[h(x+r, t)−h(x, t)]2i.(9)
In our cases of interest, due to rotational invariance, the
correlations only depend on `≡ |r|. For FV scaling
G(`, t) scales differently depending on how `compares
with the correlation length [7–9],
G(`, t)∼t2β,if t1/z `,
`2α,if `t1/z.=`2αg(`/ξ(t)),(10)
where we are assuming ` < L and g(y) is a suitable scal-
ing function [8, 9]. In fact, G(`, t) scales like the square
of the local width w(`, t)≡ h[h(x, t)−h]2i1/2(the spa-
tial average is here restricted to a region of linear size
`), G(`, t)∼w2(`, t). One can see that the scaling form
in Eq. (10) only reflects the growth and saturation dis-
cussed above for the whole system, but now restricted to
a region of linear size `[60]. A related correlation func-
tion that is also frequently studied [19] is the so-called
height covariance
C(r, t)≡ hh(x, t)h(x+r, t)i−h¯
h(t)i2,(11)
such that, again under the assumption of rotational in-
variance, G(`, t) = 2[W2(t)−C(`, t)] [8].
Whenever the roughness exponent α≥1, it is useful
to consider [60, 61] an alternative two-point correlation
function, namely, the surface structure factor, i.e. the
power spectral density of the height fluctuations, defined
as
S(k, t)≡ hˆ
h(k, t)ˆ
h(−k, t)i=h|ˆ
h(k, t)|2i,(12)
where ˆ
h(k, t)≡ F[h(x, t)] is the space Fourier transform
of h(x, t) and kis d-dimensional wave vector. The FV
Ansatz now reads
S(k, t) = k−(2α+d)sFV(kt1/z),(13)
with sFV(y) approaching a constant value for y1 and
sFV(y)∝y2α+dfor y1. This can be derived by realiz-
ing that W2(L, t) equals the integral of S(k, t) over wave
vector space (Parseval’s theorem) [9]. Likewise, S(k, t) is
analytically related with, e.g., G(r, t) via space Fourier
transforms [8].
In the case of a system of oscillators, analogous observ-
ables to the global roughness and the correlation func-
tions, to be denoted as Wφ(L, t), Gφ(r, t), Cφ(r, t) and
Sφ(k, t), are simply defined by replacing the height field
h(x, t) by the phase field φ(x, t). They will be the main
objects of our analysis in the sections to follow. Regard-
ing two-point correlations, we will be particularly inter-
ested in their value at a distance of one site, Gφ(`= 1, t),
which will be referred to as the average squared slope, and
denoted as h(∆φ)2i. Our interest lies in finite systems,
where saturation may be eventually attained. The key
point is that differences between oscillator phases that
do not evolve at the same effective frequency ωeff must
grow steadily in time for long times. Thus the phases
of two oscillators with effective frequencies ωeff
1and ωeff
2
eventually separate, φ2(t)−φ1(t)∼(ωeff
2−ωeff
1)t. For this
reason, the saturation of Wφ(L, t) [or equivalently, that
of Sφ(k, t) or Gφ(r, t)] as t→ ∞, which shows that the
phase differences stop growing at some time, indicates
the presence of synchronization in the sense mentioned
above.
D. Anomalous scaling and universal fluctuations in
the synchronization process
Two further aspects of surface growth, which have been
the focus of much recent research, will turn out to be in-
dispensable for the analysis of the synchronization prob-
lem. They both challenge the traditional characteriza-
tion of kinetic-roughening universality classes in terms
of just two independent exponents appearing in the FV
dynamic scaling Ansatz, Eq. (8). One is the existence
of growth processes with anomalous scaling properties
[8, 48–50, 53, 55]. While for standard FV systems height
fluctuations at local distances `Lscale with the same
roughness exponent as global fluctuations do at distances
comparable with the system size L, in systems displaying
anomalous scaling local and global fluctuations scale with