
2
FIG. 1. (A) Illustration of the classical single drop microextraction
(SDME) process. (B) Schematic illustration of a ternary phase dia-
gram of oil (O), water (W), and solute (S). Oil or water droplets can
be formed in the ouzo region or reverse ouzo region, respectively.
(C) General Schematic of the classical DLLME procedure. Panel
(A) and (B) taken from ref.36 Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. Panel
(C) reproduced with permission from ref.37 Copyright 2009 Elsevier
B.V.
II. DEVELOPMENT OF DROPLET-BASED EXTRACTION
Single drop microextraction (SDME), as a solvent minia-
turized extraction technique, was explored by Liu et al.38 and
Jeannot et al.39 in 1996. In a typical SDME process, an or-
ganic microdroplet (∼1–10 µL) is suspended at the tip of
a syringe needle which is surrounded by an aqueous sam-
ple solution (Fig. 1A). After extraction, the drop with en-
riched analytes is withdrawn and injected into an analyti-
cal instrument for detection and quantification. The extrac-
tion of target compounds from aqueous phase into an or-
ganic solvent drop is based on passive diffusion.40,41 The
extraction efficiency is intrinsically determined by the an-
alyte partition coefficient between the droplet liquid and
water. Different approaches to perform SDME, such as
continuous-flow microextraction,42,43 headspace SDME,44,45
drop-to-drop microextraction,46,47 and direct immersion-
SDME,48,49 have been extensively explored for analytical ap-
plications. Jeannot et al.50 summarized the historical devel-
opment and pointed out advantage/disadvantages of various
modes of SDME technique. A recent review from 2021 fo-
cused on the applications of SDME combined with multi-
ple analytical tools (spectroscopy, chromatography, and mass
spectrometry).51 The popularity of SDME mainly lies in its
cost-effectiveness and low consumption of organic solvent.
Its drawbacks are the instability of the hanging droplet, nar-
row drop surface, and consequently slow diffusion kinetics
and limited sensitivity.
DLLME, as a modified solvent microextraction technique,
was introduced in 2006 by Rezaee et al. for the extraction
of organic analytes from aqueous samples.15 In this method,
multiple extractant microdroplets are formed and stably dis-
persed in an aqueous sample comprising of the target analytes.
The formation of small droplets is based on the spontaneous
emulsification in a ternary system, which is well known as
the “Ouzo effect”.52 A typical ternary mixture consists of a
good solvent (e.g., ethanol), a poor solvent (e.g., water), and
a small ratio of extractant (e.g., oil). The three-phase diagram
of a representative ternary system is shown in Fig. 1B. The
nucleation and growth of the droplets spontaneously occur in
the ouzo regime, which is surrounded by the binodal and spin-
odal curves.53 This emulsification without surfactant is kinet-
ically stable over hours or days.54 The dramatically increased
surface area leads to the enhanced diffusion kinetics and high
recovery efficiency.
The typical procedure of DLLME is demonstrated in Fig.
1C, microdroplets of extractant are spontaneously formed
when a mixture containing an extracting solvent and a dis-
perse solvent is rapidly injected into an aqueous sample so-
lution. The partition equilibrium at the droplet interface
is reached in a few seconds owing to the large surface
area. Consequently, the extraction is almost independent of
time.55 The cloudy emulsion is then centrifuged to collect
the droplets with concentrated target compound for analy-
sis. Over the years, DLLME technique has been developed
from its basic approach into many other advanced configu-
rations. Recent revolutions of DLLME have been made re-
garding to the selection of extracting and disperse solvent,56,57
combination with other extraction techniques,58,59 associa-
tion with derivatization reaction,60,61 mechanical agitation-
assisted emulsification,62,63 etc. The review devoted specif-
ically to DLLME was published by Rezaee et al.37 in
2010 comprehensively summarizing the early development
of DLLME. Sajid et al.64 reviewed latest advancements of
DLLME with respect to its evolved design of devices, green
aspects, and application extensions. Compared to SDME,
DLLME greatly improves the enrichment efficiency. Some
limitations still exist, such as the consumption of toxic extrac-
tion solvents (e.g., carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, and
cyclohexane).37
III. FORMATION OF SURFACE NANODROPLETS
The formation principle of surface nanodroplets is also
based upon the “ouzo effect”.26 The standard protocol of the
solvent exchange to form surface nanodroplets is shown in
Fig. 2A. Different from the generation of dispersive micro-
droplets in a DLLME process, surface nanodroplets are in-
duced by an oversaturation pulse at the interacting front of the
ouzo solution (solution A) and the poor solvent (solution B) in
a narrow chamber.36 As shown in Fig. 2B, the oversaturation
level is demonstrated by the integrated area between the bin-
odal curve and the dilution path through the ouzo region. The
nanodroplets pinned on the substrate are 5–500 nm in height
and 0.1–10 µm in lateral diameter.68