
Monitoring MBE substrate deoxidation via RHEED image-sequence analysis by deep learning
Abdourahman Khaireh-Walieh,1Alexandre Arnoult,1Sébastien Plissard,1and Peter R. Wiecha1, ∗
1LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, F-31400 Toulouse, France
Reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) is a powerful tool in molecular beam epitaxy (MBE),
but RHEED images are often difficult to interpret, requiring experienced operators. We present an approach
for automated surveillance of GaAs substrate deoxidation in MBE reactors using deep learning based RHEED
image-sequence classification. Our approach consists of an non-supervised auto-encoder (AE) for feature ex-
traction, combined with a supervised convolutional classifier network. We demonstrate that our lightweight
network model can accurately identify the exact deoxidation moment. Furthermore we show that the approach
is very robust and allows accurate deoxidation detection during months without requiring re-training. The main
advantage of the approach is that it can be applied to raw RHEED images without requiring further information
such as the rotation angle, temperature, etc.
Keywords: RHEED, deep learning, molecular beam epitaxy, substrate deoxidation
I. INTRODUCTION
Reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) is a
widely used in-situ control method in molecular beam epi-
taxy (MBE) [1–4]. RHEED diffraction patterns provide in-
formation about the crystal surface with atomic resolution
and as the ultra high vacuum in typical growth chambers al-
lows an easy integration of electron beam systems in MBEs,
RHEED has become a standard in-situ characterization instru-
ment in MBE, enabling unprecedented accuracy in monitoring
the crystal growth. RHEED is highly sensitive to several key
MBE parameters like the growth rate, the crystal structure, the
lattice parameter and strain, etc [5–9]. However, RHEED im-
ages can be difficult to interpret since the diffraction patterns
produce information in the Fourier-space. Furthermore, the
actual recorded patterns are very sensitive to calibration, and
often also dynamic variations in the patterns over several time-
scales contain valuable information, rendering their analysis
even more challenging. Real-time exploitation of RHEED
data is therefore often limited to easily accessible informa-
tion like the deposition rate. Sophisticated analysis is usually
done a posteriori, on recorded RHEED images or videos. Due
to the complexity of the task, RHEED interpretation usually
requires experienced operators, possessing years of machine-
specific training.
A common application of RHEED is the monitoring of the
native oxide removal from commercial substrates prior crys-
tal growth. Surface oxidation of a few nanometers due to ex-
posure to oxygen is unavoidable during transport of epitaxial
substrates, which renders their surface non-crystalline. This
oxide needs to be removed before any epitaxial material de-
position, which is usually done by heating. In the case of gal-
lium arsenide (GaAs), the substrate is slowly heated to around
610◦C, while stabilizing the crystal with a constant arsenic
flux of around 1.2×10−5Torr, to avoid As evaporation [10].
Once the oxide is removed, in order to avoid damaging of
the crystal, further temperature ramping needs to be stopped,
usually temperature is in fact decreased. To detect the deoxi-
dation, the MBE operator supervises the RHEED image dur-
∗e-mail : pwiecha@laas.fr
ing temperature increase, and once the diffraction pattern of a
crystalline surface starts to form, the operator manually ends
the heating procedure. Not only is the constant presence of the
operator required, due to its manual character the deoxidation
procedure is furthermore error-prone. Automatic detection of
the deoxidation is challenging, first because RHEED patterns
are often weak since the raw substrate surfaces are not atom-
ically flat, and second because the RHEED image contrast is
dependent on some parameters like filament current or elec-
tron beam angle, and hence is not exactly constant in each
run. Finally, the substrate is usually laying on a rotating sam-
ple holder, hence the RHEED pattern constantly changes.
Methods from artificial intelligence including deep learning
are increasingly applied to nano- and material-science [11–
15]. Recently, first attempts have been reported to use sta-
tistical methods and machine learning for RHEED image in-
terpretation [16–20]. Inspired by these pioneering works, we
propose to use a deep learning (DL) approach for classifica-
tion of oxidized and deoxidized substrates via their RHEED
patterns, to resolve the above described problems. As men-
tioned above, due to the sample rotation, the RHEED signal
can confidently indicate deoxidation only during short mo-
ments, when the electron beam is aligned with a lattice di-
rection of the crystal. In contrast to recent propositions to
use DL with RHEED for surface reconstruction identification
[19,20], we therefore propose a model which analyzes se-
quences of RHEED patterns (i.e. videos), instead of single
images. To this end, we propose a two-stage deep learning
model: The first stage is an autoencoder, which compresses
each full-resolution RHEED image into a low-dimensional la-
tent vector. The second stage subsequently determines the
oxidation state for a sequence of such latent vectors, hence
for the compressed representation of a short RHEED video
sequence. We provide a detailed analysis of the required la-
tent and sequence lengths and demonstrate the accuracy of
the model as well as its stability over a period of more than 6
months between training data sampling and testing. Finally,
we provide online the data, codes as well as pre-trained mod-
els to reproduce our results [21].
arXiv:2210.03430v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 15 Dec 2022