
Chiral and trace anomalies in Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering
Shohini Bhattacharya,1, ∗Yoshitaka Hatta,1, 2, †and Werner Vogelsang3, ‡
1Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
2RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
3Institute for Theoretical Physics, T¨ubingen University,
Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 T¨ubingen, Germany
Inspired by recent work by Tarasov and Venugopalan, we calculate the one-loop quark box diagrams
relevant to polarized and unpolarized Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) by introducing off-forward
momentum lµas an infrared regulator. In the polarized case, we rederive the pole 1/l2related to
the axial (chiral) anomaly. In addition, we obtain the usual logarithmic term and the DIS coefficient
function. We interpret the result in terms of the generalized parton distributions (GPDs) ˜
Hand
˜
Eand discuss the possible violation of QCD factorization for the Compton scattering amplitude.
Remarkably, we also find poles in the unpolarized case which are remnants of the trace anomaly. We
argue that these poles are canceled by the would-be massless glueball poles in the GPDs Hand Eas
well as in their moments, the nucleon gravitational form factors A, B and D. This mechanism sheds
light on the connection between the gravitational form factors and the gluon condensate operator
Fµν Fµν .
I. INTRODUCTION
The role of the UA(1) axial (chiral) anomaly in polarized Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) has a long and winding
history. Originally in the late 1970s it was used to constrain the one-loop gluonic correction to the first moment of
the singlet g1(x) structure function, as well as the two-loop anomalous dimension of the quark helicity contribution
∆Σ to the proton spin [1]. Soon after the discovery of the ‘spin crisis’ by the European Muon Collaboration (EMC)
in 1988 [2], it was suggested that an anomaly-induced gluon helicity ∆Gcontribution to the ‘intrinsic’ quark helicity
∆˜
Σ
∆Σ = ∆˜
Σ−nfαs
2π∆G , (1)
could be the key to explaining the unexpectedly small value of ∆Σ [3, 4]. While such a scenario became popular at
the time, subsequent decades-long experiments and global analyses did not find evidence for a sufficiently large ∆G
to make it phenomenologically viable [5–7]. More importantly, the identification of the axial anomaly contribution as
gluon helicity also met with much theoretical objection from the very start [8–11]. The gluonic contribution in (1)
comes from the infrared region of the triangle diagram which contains the Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly. As pointed
out by Jaffe and Manohar [8], a proper way to regulate the infrared singularity of this diagram is to calculate it in
off-forward kinematics. The anomaly then manifests itself as a pole in momentum transfer l=p2−p1in the matrix
element of the singlet axial current Jµ
5=Pf¯
ψfγµγ5ψf,
hp2|Jµ
5|p1i=nfαs
4π
ilµ
l2hp2|Fαβ
a˜
Fa
αβ |p1i,(2)
where the incoming and outgoing gluons are on shell and the nfquarks in the loop are massless. The appearance of the
pole 1/l2and the twist-four pseudoscalar operator F˜
Fseem alarming, as they signal some underlying nonperturbative
physics that does not fit into the standard perturbative QCD framework. Yet, in ordinary perturbative calculations
done in forward kinematics, this problem is superficially avoided by certain choices of infrared regularization such as
dimensional regularization.
∗Electronic address: sbhattach@bnl.gov
†Electronic address: yhatta@bnl.gov
‡Electronic address: werner.vogelsang@uni-tuebingen.de
arXiv:2210.13419v2 [hep-ph] 16 Jan 2023