An Event Study of the Ethereum Transition to Proof-of-Stake Elie Kapengut1and Bruce Mizrach2

2025-04-30 0 0 563.07KB 20 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
An Event Study of the Ethereum Transition to
Proof-of-Stake
Elie Kapengut1and Bruce Mizrach2
1Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ USA
2Department of Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ USA
First Draft: October 13, 2022
Revised: February 25, 2023
Abstract
On September 15, 2022, the Ethereum network adopted a proof-of-stake (PoS) consen-
sus mechanism. We study the impact on the network and competing platforms in a
two month event window around the Beacon chain merge. We find that the transition
to PoS has reduced energy consumption by 99.98%. Miners have not transformed into
validators, and total block reward income (in USD) has fallen by 97%, though transac-
tion fees (in ETH) for Ether have increased nearly 10%. The Herfindahl index for the
top 10 is 1,009; the network is 19% less concentrated after the merge. Ethereum supply
growth has been deflationary since the merge. The time between consecutive blocks is
now steady at 12 seconds and transactions per day are up 7.0%. On Polygon, Matic
fees rose but token fees fell. Polygon also slows, processing 3.3% fewer transactions per
day. Solana’s fees fall by $0.0003, and transactions per day are down 48%. Stablecoin
transfer volumes fall on Ethereum and Polygon, but rise on Solana.
Keywords: Ethereum; proof-of-stake; merge; cryptocurrency.
JEL Codes: G12; G23.
Correspondence: Department of Economics, Rutgers University, 75 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick,
NJ 08901 USA. email: mizrach@econ.rutgers.edu, (908) 913-0253 (voice) and (425) 795-9942 (fax).
arXiv:2210.13655v2 [q-fin.TR] 28 Feb 2023
1 Introduction
The Ethereum blockchain began operation on July 30, 2015. For more than seven years,
the chain was secured by a proof-of-work (PoW) protocol. This entailed large clusters of
specialized computers, known as mining networks, competing with one another to find a
random number called the nonce. The first miner to show that the hash of the nonce was
below the network’s difficulty level would be allowed to add the new block to the chain. The
miner would receive a block reward and collect gas fees for the transactions included in the
block. As the network difficulty increased, the energy resources consumed by the miners
grew ever larger.
Figure 1: Electricity Consumption of the Ethereum Network
Note: The data are collected by Digiconomist, https://digiconomist.net/ethereum-energy-con
sumption
On August 13, 2022, the electricity consumption of the network, using the methodology
of de Vries (2018), reached a peak, annualized at 93.975 Terra Watt Hours per year.1For
context, this exceeds the usage by the Phillipines.2
Vitalik Buterin, founder of the network, had advocated for a transition to proof-of-stake
(PoS) as early as 2016.3This validation method requires stakers to verify new transac-
tions. Instead of searching randomly for the nonce, stakers place their Ethereum holdings
into a smart contract as collateral. If stakers fail to fulfill their validation responsibilities–
accidentally or maliciously–they can be punished by losing their staked coins. Stakers for
1An alternative, more conservative methodology is used by Krause and Tolaymat (2018).
2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of countries by electricity consumption
3https://medium.com/@VitalikButerin/a-proof-of-stake-design-philosophy-506585978d51
1
any given block are chosen via a pseudo-random algorithm known as RANDAO.4Edgington
(2022) provides a more comprehensive discussion about RANDAO, and Park et al. (2020)
contains details on Ethereum’s implementation of PoS.
Since PoS forgoes the energy-intensive problem solving characteristic of proof-of-work,
the Ethereum transition to PoS has cut the electricity usage of the network to 0.015 Terra
Watts, a 99.98% decrease, as seen in Figure 1.
Figure 2: Ethereum Blockchain Pre and Post Merge
Note: Nonce and difficulty, which were critical to proof-of-work, are now empty since they
are not part of proof-of-stake. The miner column is now populated by the fee recipient–the
validator. The data are from the Ethereum Mainnet which we obtain from Kaggle.
The last block mined under PoW5was 15537393 by F2 Pool Old at 6:42:42 AM GMT on
September 15, 2022. It included only one ERC-721 (NFT) transaction. The first PoS block6
15537394 was a normal sized block7with 80 transactions, but it included a 45 Ether (ETH)
priority fee (tip) We will drop the transition day, September 15, in most of our analysis,
analyzing one month event windows around that date.
2 Data and Methods
This paper will examine the composition of the validator pool, block fees and rewards, and
the network speed, on the Ethereum network. Our data sources are the Ethereum blockchain
which we obtain from Kaggle.8Data from the pre-merge Beacon Chain is from Bitquery.9
We will also compare Ethereum to Polygon and Solana on fees, speed and transfer volumes.
The Polygon data are from Quicknode,10 and the Solana data are from its’ command line
interface.11
4https://www.randao.org/whitepaper/Randao v0.85 en.pdf
5https://etherscan.io/block/15537393
6The block was in slot 4700013, epoch 146875. A slot is a time period of 12 seconds in which a validator
can propose a block. There are 32 slots in one epoch.
7https://etherscan.io/block/15537394
8https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/bigquery/ethereum-blockchain
9https://explorer.bitquery.io/eth2
10https://www.quicknode.com/core-api
11https://docs.solana.com/cli
2
3 Validators
Prior to the merge, blocks were added by the miners. For the period August 14 to September
14, 2022, we computed the number of blocks and associated transactions that each miner
completed. The top 10 miners, by blocks completed, are in Table 1. The Herfindahl index
for the top ten is 1,245. Ethermine has the largest market share at 28.6%.
Table 1: Most Active Miners Leading into the Merge
Miner address Blocks formed No. Trans. Miner names
0xea674fdde714fd979de3edf0f56aa9716b898ec8 56,960 11,437,974 Ethermine
0x829bd824b016326a401d083b33d092293333a830 29,304 5,231,405 F2Pool
0x1ad91ee08f21be3de0ba2ba6918e714da6b45836 20,436 2,967,793 Hiveon
0x00192fb10df37c9fb26829eb2cc623cd1bf599e8 14,452 2,253,984 2Miners
0x7f101fe45e6649a6fb8f3f8b43ed03d353f2b90c 9,859 1,397,143 Flexpool
0x2daa35962a6d43eb54c48367b33d0b379c930e5e 7,004 1,086,420 Poolin 2
0x52bc44d5378309ee2abf1539bf71de1b7d7be3b5 5,419 1,035,186 Nanopool
0x3ecef08d0e2dad803847e052249bb4f8bff2d5bb 4,432 816,551 Mining Pool Hub
0xb7e390864a90b7b923c9f9310c6f98aafe43f707 4,390 777,536 Unknown1
0xcd458d7f11023556cc9058f729831a038cb8df9c 3,803 628,777 Poolin 4
Note: The totals are for Ethereum network blocks for the month preceding the merge, August 14 to
September 14, 2022.
Blocks are now secured by validators, participants in the Ethereum 2.0 consensus algo-
rithm who have placed at least 32 ETH into the deposit contract12 shown in Figure 3. A
committee of at least 128 validators, selected by RANDAO, are chosen to add a block for
any given slot. One participant, called the block proposer, forms the block, a process that
entails selecting and verifying a set of transactions has no failures or errors. The block then
needs to be confirmed by the remaining validators, called attesters, who check and give their
vote of confidence to the block. Finality is achieved at the checkpoint block, the first block
in the next epoch, with support from 2/3 of the staked ETH.13
The randomness of selection means that validators must have an active system nearly
24/7; they can have some or all of their stake burned 14 and be removed (slashed ) from the
set of validators, for failing to complete an assigned task. As of November 1, 2022, 217
validators have been slashed,15 24 since the merge.
12https://etherscan.io/address/0x00000000219ab540356cBB839Cbe05303d7705Fa
13https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/finality
14A term used to describe ETH that is cut loose from the network and is thus unacessible to any user.
15https://beaconcha.in/validators/slashings
3
摘要:

AnEventStudyoftheEthereumTransitiontoProof-of-StakeElieKapengut1andBruceMizrach21RutgersUniversity,NewBrunswick,NJUSA2DepartmentofEconomics,RutgersUniversity,NewBrunswick,NJUSAFirstDraft:October13,2022Revised:February25,2023AbstractOnSeptember15,2022,theEthereumnetworkadoptedaproof-of-stake(PoS)cons...

展开>> 收起<<
An Event Study of the Ethereum Transition to Proof-of-Stake Elie Kapengut1and Bruce Mizrach2.pdf

共20页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:20 页 大小:563.07KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-30

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 20
客服
关注