A spectral boundary integral method for simulating electrohydrodynamic ows in viscous drops Mohammadhossein Firouznia1Spencer H. Bryngelson2and David Saintillan1

2025-04-27 0 0 4MB 18 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
A spectral boundary integral method for simulating electrohydrodynamic
flows in viscous drops
Mohammadhossein Firouznia,1Spencer H. Bryngelson,2and David Saintillan1,
1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
2School of Computational Science & Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology,
756 West Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
(Dated: October 12, 2022)
A weakly conducting liquid droplet immersed in another leaky dielectric liquid can exhibit rich dy-
namical behaviors under the effect of an applied electric field. Depending on material properties and
field strength, the nonlinear coupling of interfacial charge transport and fluid flow can trigger elec-
trohydrodynamic instabilities that lead to shape deformations and complex dynamics. We present
a spectral boundary integral method to simulate droplet electrohydrodynamics in a uniform electric
field. All physical variables, such as drop shape and interfacial charge density, are represented using
spherical harmonic expansions. In addition to its exponential accuracy, the spectral representation
affords a nondissipative dealiasing method required for numerical stability. A comprehensive charge
transport model, valid under a wide range of electric field strengths, accounts for charge relaxation,
Ohmic conduction, and surface charge convection by the flow. A shape reparametrization tech-
nique enables the exploration of significant droplet deformation regimes. For low-viscosity drops,
the convection by the flow drives steep interfacial charge gradients near the drop equator. This in-
troduces numerical ringing artifacts we treat via a weighted spherical harmonic expansion, resulting
in solution convergence. The method and simulations are validated against experimental data and
analytical predictions in the axisymmetric Taylor and Quincke electrorotation regimes.
I. INTRODUCTION
A wide range of engineering applications involve liquid drops immersed in another fluid while subject to
an applied electric field. Some examples include ink-jet printing [1], electrospraying [2], and microfluidic
devices and pumps [3]. These systems exhibit rich dynamics due to the electric field and fluid flow
coupling. When an interface separating two immiscible fluids is subject to an otherwise uniform electric
field, the electric field undergoes a jump across the interface due to the mismatch in material properties.
This discontinuity in the electric field induces electric stresses that can deform the interface and drive
the fluid into motion.
We are interested in leaky dielectric liquids such as oils, which serve as poor conductors. Unlike
electrolyte solutions where diffuse Debye layers affect the system’s dynamics, leaky dielectrics are char-
acterized by the absence of diffuse Debye layers [4]. The free charges instead concentrate on the inter-
faces between different phases in the system. Consequently, the electric field acting on the interfacial
charge creates electric stresses along the normal and tangential directions, which cause deformations
and fluid motion. Surface tension has a stabilizing effect in general, trying to restore the equilibrium
shape. Melcher and Taylor developed a framework for studying electrohydrodynamic phenomena in
leaky dielectric systems, known as the leaky dielectric model (LDM) [5]. Central to their work is a
charge conservation model that describes a balance between Ohmic fluxes from the bulk, interfacial
charge convection, and finite charge relaxation. It was previously shown that LDM can be derived
asymptotically from electrokinetic models in the limit of strong electric fields and thin Debye layers
[6,7].
This work focuses on the dynamics of a leaky dielectric drop immersed in another dielectric fluid
under a uniform DC electric field. This canonical problem has been a long-standing research problem
in electrohydrodynamics. In his pioneering work, Taylor [8] formulated a small-deformation theory
for an isolated drop based on LDM and could predict oblate and prolate steady shapes depending on
the material properties. While Taylor’s theory shows good agreement with experimental data in the
Corresponding author: dstn@ucsd.edu
arXiv:2210.04957v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 10 Oct 2022
2
limit of vanishing electric capillary number CaE(ratio of electric to capillary forces), the discrepancy is
significant at larger values of CaE. Therefore, other researchers attempted to extend Taylor’s work by
accounting for second-order effects in CaE[9], considering spheroidal drops [10,11], including inertial
effects [12] and interfacial charge convection [1316].
A variety of computational models have been developed to study drop dynamics under strong electric
fields at finite deformations, a problem untractable using analytical theories. In the limit of negligible
inertia, boundary integral equations can be used to formulate and solve the coupled electrohydrody-
namic problem. Sherwood was the first to develop a boundary element method for an axisymmetric
drop in an equiviscous system and applied it to capture breakup modes in prolate drops [17]. His
original work was subsequently extended to study drop pair interaction [18] and to cover a wider range
of fluid and electric parameters [19]. These earlier attempts used a simplified boundary condition for
the electric problem, which neglected transient charge relaxation and interfacial charge convection by
the flow. These two effects have recently been shown to play a significant role in drop dynamics and
deformations [16]. Lanauze et al. [20] and Das and Saintillan [21] recently addressed this problem and
developed axisymmetric and three-dimensional boundary element methods based on the full Melcher-
Taylor LDM. The effect of charge convection was specifically addressed in [21], where it was shown to
be responsible for Quincke electrorotation. These methods, however, were found to lack accuracy and
stability in the regime of strong electric fields. Other numerical approaches have been used to study
drop electrohydrodynamics, including immersed boundary [22], level set [23,24], and finite element
methods [2527]. More recently, finite element simulations [28,29] were also used to investigate elec-
trohydrodynamic instabilities such as tip and equatorial streaming in drops under strong electric fields.
These latter techniques all include finite fluid inertia and, with few exceptions [24], do not treat the
drop surface as a sharp interface.
Improved accuracy within the boundary integral framework can be achieved using spectral methods,
which rely on expansions of the shape and interfacial variables based on spherical harmonics. Such meth-
ods were recently developed to simulate electrohydrodynamics of lipid vesicles [30] and also extended
to the case of individual drops and drop pairs [3133]. These studies, however, all neglected charge
relaxation and charge convection and were thus restricted to weak electric fields. Accurately capturing
charge convection is especially challenging as it nonlinearly couples fluid flow and charge transport on
a deformed interface. It can result in spurious aliasing errors with negative consequences for accuracy
and stability. This work addresses this challenge and presents a spectral boundary integral method for
the electrohydrodynamics of deformable liquid drops based on the complete Melcher–Taylor LDM. In-
terfacial charge convection is rigorously accounted for, and dealiasing and reparametrization techniques
are implemented to improve accuracy and stability and enable long-time simulations.
The paper is organized as follows. We define the problem and discuss the governing equations and
boundary conditions in Sec. II A, along with their non-dimensionalization in Sec. II B. Sec. II C presents
the integral form of the governing equations and boundary conditions used in developing the boundary
integral method. We discuss different aspects of the numerical method in Sec. III: the spectral repre-
sentation of all variables in terms of spherical harmonics is discussed in III A, followed by details of the
dealiasing method in Sec. III B. Next, in Sec. III C, we summarize the numerical integration methods
used in this study and correction methods to ensure charge neutrality and incompressibility in Sec. III D.
As explained in Sec. III E, we also use a reparametrization method to improve the numerical stability in
simulations where the drop undergoes significant deformations. We test and validate our computational
model by applying it to a wide range of dynamical behaviors, such as the axisymmetric Taylor regime
under weak electric fields in Sec. IV A, and Quincke electrorotation under stronger electric fields in
Sec. IV B. We also investigate the dynamics of low-viscosity drops in Sec. IV C, where charge convection
plays an important role. Finally, we discuss our conclusions and possible extensions of our work in
Sec. V.
II. PROBLEM DEFINITION
A. Governing equations
We consider a neutrally buoyant drop of a fluid occupying volume Vimmersed in an infinite body
of another fluid V+while subject to a uniform electric field E=Eˆ
ezas depicted schematically
3
FIG. 1: Problem definition: a leaky dielectric drop with (σ, , µ) is suspended in another leaky
dielectric fluid with (σ+, +, µ+) and subject to an external electric field E. The drop deforms and
diverges from its initially spherical shape.
in Fig. 1. The interface Dseparates the two fluid media, and the surface unit normal n(x) is pointed
towards the suspending fluid. Initially, the drop is uncharged and spherical with radius r0. The material
properties, namely the dielectric permittivities, electric conductivities, and dynamic viscosities, are
denoted by (±, σ±, µ±) inside and outside the drop, respectively. Under the Taylor–Melcher leaky
dielectric model [8], any net charge in the system appears on the interface D, and the bulk of the fluids
remain electroneutral. Therefore, the electric potential is harmonic in the bulk:
2ϕ±(x)=0,xV±.(1)
Far away from the interface, the electric field E=ϕtends to the applied electric field:
E+E=Eˆ
ez,as |x| → ±∞.(2)
While the tangential component of the electric field is continuous across the interface, its normal com-
ponent undergoes a jump due to the mismatch in material properties:
n×JEK=0,xD. (3)
We define the operator JFK:=F+Fas the jump in any variable Facross the interface D. A surface
charge density develops at the interface and follows Gauss’s law,
q(x) = n·JEK,xD. (4)
The surface charge evolves due to Ohmic currents from the bulk and convective currents on the interface.
Consequently, it satisfies the conservation equation:
tq+n·JσEK+s·(qu) = 0,xD, (5)
where s= (Inn)· ∇ is the surface gradient operator and uis the fluid velocity.
Neglecting the effect of inertia and gravity, the velocity and pressure fields satisfy the Stokes and
continuity equations:
µ±2u±p±=0,∇ · u±= 0,xV±.(6)
The velocity vector is continuous across the interface and vanishes far from it as
Ju(x)K=0,xD, (7)
u+(x)0,as |x|→∞.(8)
4
The balance of interfacial forces requires that the jump in hydrodynamic and electric tractions across
the interface balance capillary forces:
JfHK+JfEK=γ(s·n)n,xD. (9)
We neglect Marangoni effects due to variations in surface tension, sγ=0. Hydrodynamic and electric
tractions are expressed in terms of the Newtonian and Maxwell stress tensors, respectively:
fH=n·TH,TH=pI+µu+uT,(10)
fE=n·TE,TE=EE 1
2E2I.(11)
The jump in electric tractions can be decomposed into tangential and normal components as
fE=JEnKEt+1
2J(En2Et2)Kn=qEt+JpEKn,(12)
where pE=(En2Et2)/2 is the electric pressure [19]. The first term on the right-hand side represents
the tangential electric stresses in leaky dielectrics, and it vanishes when both fluids are either perfect
dielectrics or perfect conductors.
B. Non-dimensionalization
For the system described above, a dimensional analysis yields five dimensionless groups, three of which
characterize the mismatch of material properties in the drop and the suspending fluid:
R = σ+
σ,Q =
+, λ =µ
µ+.(13)
The limits of λ0 and correspond to a bubble and a rigid particle, respectively. The remaining
dimensionless groups describe the system’s dynamics and can be obtained by comparing the character-
istic time scales in the problem. First, note that the response of each fluid phase to Ohmic conduction
is characterized by the charge relaxation time:
τ±
c=±
σ±.(14)
The product RQ = τ +is the ratio of charge relaxation times in two fluids and plays an important
role in the dynamics of the drop [21]. The polarization time for a rigid sphere under an applied electric
field is the Maxwell–Wagner relaxation time
τMW =+ 2+
σ+ 2σ+=R(Q + 2)
1 + 2R τ+
c,(15)
which provides an approximate timescale for polarization of the drop. The accumulation of free charges
on the interface creates electric forces that drive the fluid into motion on the electrohydrodynamic time
scale
τEHD =µ+
+E2
.(16)
Deformations away from the equilibrium spherical shape relax under the effect of surface tension on the
capillary time scale
τγ=µ+r0
γ.(17)
By taking the ratios of these time scales, the two remaining dimensionless groups can be defined as
CaE=τγ
τEHD
=E2
r0
γ.Ma = τEHD
τMW
=µ+
τMW+E2
.(18)
摘要:

AspectralboundaryintegralmethodforsimulatingelectrohydrodynamicowsinviscousdropsMohammadhosseinFirouznia,1SpencerH.Bryngelson,2andDavidSaintillan1,1DepartmentofMechanicalandAerospaceEngineering,UniversityofCaliforniaSanDiego,9500GilmanDrive,LaJolla,CA92093,USA2SchoolofComputationalScience&Engineeri...

展开>> 收起<<
A spectral boundary integral method for simulating electrohydrodynamic ows in viscous drops Mohammadhossein Firouznia1Spencer H. Bryngelson2and David Saintillan1.pdf

共18页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:18 页 大小:4MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-27

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 18
客服
关注