analytical background and fluctuations is no longer valid after some time and simulations need
to involve full-fmethods such as the semi-Lagrangian scheme used in the GYSELA code [18].
Another example is the modelling of the tokamak edge region where the plasma density may
strongly deviate from local Maxwellian distributions, with large and intermittent fluctuations.
This has motivated the development of various Eulerian full-fschemes such as those presented
in Ref. [15, 25], where large plasma blob structures can be seen propagating from the core region
towards the tokamak edge.
If one desires to model such problems with a δf PIC method, it is thus necessary to allow
for general updates of the bulk density over time. An interesting approach in this direction was
proposed in Ref. [1]: it consisted of projecting the particle density δf on a coarse spline basis
and add the resulting smoothed distribution to the bulk density.
In this article we consider a variant of this approach where the bulk density is updated using
a semi-Lagrangian approach based on the Forward-Backward Lagrangian (FBL) method [7].
Inspired by Ref. [12], the core of the FBL method is to compute backward trajectories on
arbitrary nodes by local inversions of the particle trajectories: as these describe the forward
transport flow in phase space and are naturally provided by the PIC code, their local inversion
allows to perform semi-Lagrangian updates of a smooth density represented on a coarse grid.
In particular the novelty of our approach is that it does not primarily rely on an accurate
particle approximation of the density itself, but rather on an accurate description of the particle
trajectories. As these are in general much less noisy than the phase space density, we believe
that this new paradigm can lead to efficient low-noise particle methods.
The outline is as follows. In Section 2 we present our general ansatz for the discrete density,
which may be seen as a hybrid discretization between particle and semi-Lagrangian density rep-
resentations. In Section 3 we recall the key steps of electrostatic particle-in-cell approximations,
and in Section 4 we describe the δf PIC method with FBL remappings of the bulk density. The
proposed method is summarized in Section 5, and in Section 6 we present a series of numerical
results involving two-stream instability test cases to illustrate the enhanced denoising properties
of our approach. We conclude in Section 7 with a summary of the proposed method, a discussion
on its novelty and two perspectives for future research.
2 Approximation ansatz
Our ansatz for the general density at a discrete time tnis a sum of two terms,
fn:= fn
∗+δfn(1)
(we shall often use := to highlight a definition) where the first one will be seen as the bulk density,
a smooth approximation to the full solution, and the second one as the fine scale variations.
Following the general principle of δf methods we require fn
∗to have a simple expression that is
easy to evaluate at arbitrary positions in a general d-dimensional phase space, and we represent
the variation δfnas an unstructured collection of numerical particles with coordinates zn
kand
weights δwn
k,
δfn(z) :=
Np
X
k=1
δwn
kϕε(z−zn
k).(2)
Here ϕεis a smooth shape function of scale εand z= (z1, . . . , zd) is a phase-space coordinate.
In typical problems where the transported density slightly deviates from an initial profile, the
2