
2
alarge-deviation framework [33] (also called Wentzel-
Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) method in the context of e.g.
population dynamics see, e.g., [34–37]) and study in de-
tail several aspects of the most general birth-death pro-
cesses, exhibiting a phase transition into an absorbing
state.
In particular, we obtain a general expression for the
leading and next-to-leading terms of the stationary prob-
ability distribution of the fraction of "active" sites, as a
function of the systems size N. By doing this, we first
reproduce diverse results from the literature and, then,
we also derive all the moments of the stationary distri-
bution for the specific case of the q-susceptible-infected-
susceptible (q−SIS) model, i.e., a higher-order epidemic
model requiring of qactive ("infected") sites with q > 1,
to activate an additional one. We uncover a very rich phe-
nomenology for the fluctuations of the fraction of positive
sites, with a non-trivial dependence both on the system
size N(i.e. anomalous finite-size scaling) and on the or-
der qof the interaction. In particular, we stress the fact
that, crucially and contrarily to the standard situation,
e.g. in equilibrium statistical mechanics, one needs to go
beyond leading order in Nto properly describe critical
fluctuations.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we
first introduce the general framework for a general birth-
death process on a complete graph, deriving as a first step
general results for the stationary distribution at large N
using a large-deviation approach [33]. In Section III we
consider the case of systems with an absorbing state and
we define a quasi-stationary distribution. In Section IV B
we study in detail the higher-order q−SIS model, de-
riving all the moments of the quasi-stationary distribu-
tion and their finite-size scaling properties, underlining
its non-trivial behavior. Finally, Section Vsummarizes
the conclusions and some open problems.
II. THE MASTER EQUATION IN THE
LARGE-DEVIATION (OR WKB) APPROACH
In order to fix notation and ideas, let us recapitu-
late some well-known approaches and results [12,34–40].
For this, let us consider a dynamical process on a fully-
connected network (or "complete graph") of size N. The
network state is specified by a set of binary variables
σi= 0,1: one for each node i. The variable n=Piσi
counts the number of active nodes, i.e., in state σi= 1.
The transition-rate functions γ−(n)and γ+(n), represent
the probability that ndecreases or increases by one unit,
respectively, defining a general mean-field-like dynamics
on the complete graph, as determined by the (one-step)
Master equation [38,39]:
P(n, t + 1) −P(n, t) = −P(n, t)(γ+(n) + γ−(n))
+P(n+ 1, t)γ−(n+ 1) + P(n−1, t)γ+(n−1).(1)
for the probability to be in the state nat time t,P(n, t).
Observe that Eq.(1) may describe many possible mean-
field-like models such as, e.g., the Ising model, the SIS
model, the voter model, and also models with more com-
plex behavior involving higher-order interactions on q
sites, such as the q-neighbor Ising model [41] or the q-
voter model [42]. The associated stationary distribution,
Pst(n)is simply given by the detailed-balance condition
[38,39]:
Pst(n)γ+(n) = Pst(n+ 1)γ−(n+ 1).(2)
with γ−(0) = γ+(N) = 0, since 0≤n≤N, an equation
that can be formally solved in an exact way:
Pst(n) = Pst(0)
n
Y
j=1
γ+(j−1)/γ−(j),(3)
where Pst(0) is fixed by the overall normalisation condi-
tion (note, in particular, that if γ+(n0) = 0 for some
n0, this implies that Pst(n) = 0 for n > n0and, if
γ−(n0) = 0, then Pst(n) = 0 for n < n0, so that the dy-
namics is asymptotically confined in a subset of the state
space). Eq.(3) can be used to obtain an exact numeri-
cal evaluation of the stationary probability distribution;
indeed, it has been employed in different contexts such
as for the q-neighbor Ising model [41], for the SIS model
and its generalizations [43–45] and for neutral models in
ecology [46], to name but a few examples.
To make further progress, let us assume that, in the
limit of large network sizes (N→ ∞), γ+(n)and γ−(n)
just depend on the fraction of active sites, x=n/N (that
can be treated as a continuous variable), so that Eq.((2))
can be written as
Pst(x, N)γ+(x) = Pst(x+ 1/N, N )γ−(x+ 1/N ).(4)
Within a large-deviation or WKB approach, at large N
Pst(x, N)can be expressed as [33,35,36]
Pst(x, N) = e−NF (x)−g(x) + Θ(1/N).(5)
Plugging this expression into Eq.(4), one readily obtains:
log(γ+(x)) −NF (x)−g(x) =
log(γ−(x+1
N)) −NF (x+1
N)−g(x+1
N)(6)
and, expanding Eq.(6) for large N:
log(γ+(x)) −NF (x)−g(x) =
log(γ−(x)) + ˙γ−(x)
γ−(x)
1
N−NF (x)−N˙
F(x)1
N−
N
2¨
F(x)1
N2−g(x)−˙g(x)1
N(7)
where the dot stands for x-derivatives. Finally, equat-
ing terms of the same order in 1/N and performing the
integrals, leads to:
F(x) = C+Zx
c
log(γ−(x′)) −log(γ+(x′))dx′
g(x) = B+1
2log(γ−(x)γ+(x)) (8)