
2
separate this anomalous Josephson effect from that in un-
conventional JJs, the term “φ0-junction” was introduced
[12].
In recent years we received compelling experimental
verification of these anomalous Josephson phenomena in
various heterojunctions [17–25]. These devices represent
a diverse class of systems that differ from each other by
material components, dimensionality, quality of contacts,
and purity of interlayers between superconducting banks,
thus reflecting the prevalence and robustness of the afore-
mentioned effects. Theoretical studies address a broad
spectrum of questions related but not limited to (i) types
of spin-orbit interaction, including spin-active interfaces;
(ii) effects of impurities; and (iii) electronic band struc-
ture, in particular topological properties. There are a
number of notable theoretical contributions to this topic,
and we can highlight studies of the AJE in quantum dots
[26, 27], semiconducting nanowires [28–34], and topolog-
ical [35–42] and nontopological systems [43–57] that in-
volve a combination of unconventional superconductors,
topological surface or edge states, and ferromagnets.
The continuous improvement in the quality of mate-
rials, where the electron mean free path is comparable
to or even may exceed the dimensions of the junction,
call for the investigation of AJE in the clean limit, which
thus far has received very limited theoretical attention.
This task is accomplished in the present work, and the
rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we
apply Ginzburg-Landau (GL) phenomenology to address
the anomalous Josephson effect in the two-dimensional
electron gas (2DEG) with Rashba-type spin-orbit cou-
pling. Even though the GL formalism has its limitations,
it gives us an opportunity to fully analytically investi-
gate the field dependence of the critical current and the
phase shift in the two-dimensional geometry. The prin-
cipal results of this work are presented in Sec. III, where
we develop a microscopic theory of the AJE based on
the Gor’kov equations for two complementary junction
geometries. This analysis expands previous considera-
tions of the AJE that exploited semiclassical approxima-
tions for ballistic (Eilenberger limit) and diffusive (Usadel
limit) systems. In Sec. IV we provide summary of our
findings in comparison to earlier related works.
II. GINZBURG-LANDAU FORMALISM
To elucidate the unusual properties of the AJE, we
start with the simple Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model be-
fore delving into the microscopic calculation. The geom-
etry that we consider is depicted schematically in Fig. 1
in which a normal region of two-dimensional electron gas
(2DEG) of length Land width dis flanked by two con-
ventional s-wave superconducting banks. Let us consider
the situation where the time reversal symmetry (TRS) in
the system is broken by an in-plane magnetic field hand
the space inversion symmetry in the normal region is bro-
ken by the presence of a Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling
FIG. 1. Geometry of a planar SINIS Josephson junction with
Rashba-type 2DEG as the normal region. The in-plane mag-
netic field his directed arbitrarily in the x−yplane and the
vector nis along the zaxis. The total length of the normal
region is Land its total width is d. The complex supercon-
ducting order parameter in the leads is |ψ0|e±iφ/2so that φ
is the total phase difference across the junction.
(SOC) term [16] given by α[σ×p]·n. Here σis the Pauli
spin matrix-vector, pis the particle momentum, nis the
unit vector along the direction of the asymmetric poten-
tial gradient, and the parameter αdenotes the strength
of the spin-orbit interaction, which has units of velocity.
In the presence of SOC, the GL free energy Ω was
derived by Edelstein [58] (see also related works Refs.
[59–62]):
Ω (ψ, ψ∗) = Zdr"a|ψ|2+b
2|ψ|4+1
4m|∂ψ|2
−[n×h]· {ψ(∂ψ)∗+ψ∗(∂ψ)}+h2
8π#,
(3)
where ψ(r) is the spatially inhomogeneous superconduct-
ing order parameter, h=∇×Awhere Ais the vector
potential, and ∂=−i∇−2eAis the gauge invariant
derivative. Here and in what follows, we work in the units
~=kB=c= 1. This form of the GL functional applies
to both clean and disordered superconductors. The dif-
ference is in the dependence of the expansion coefficients
a, b, , and also the gradient term, on the strength of
spin-orbit α, critical temperature Tcof a superconductor,
and elastic scattering time τinduced by disorder poten-
tial. The conventional part of the GL functional, namely,
the first three terms in Eq. (3), weakly depends on the
SOC. In contrast, the coefficient =α
vFpFfd(αpF
Tc, Tcτ),
with vFand pFbeing the Fermi velocity and the Fermi
momentum, respectively, depends sensitively on α. The
asymptotic form of the function fdis established for two-
and three-dimensional superconductors in various limit-
ing cases, see Refs. [58, 61, 62] for details. Both pa-
rameters αpF/Tcand Tcτcan be of the order of unity in
materials.
The free energy functional in Eq. (3) must be mini-
mized with respect to the order parameter ψ∗and the