
keV) is used for applications comparable to the one in this study. The experiments were carried out using an in-house
developed vacuum chamber[
10
] equipped with calibrated photodiodes and an energy-dispersive silicon drift detector
(SDD) with experimentally determined response functions and radiometrically calibrated detection efficiency[
11
]. The
sample was placed into the center of the chamber by means of an x-y scanning stage and the incident angle
θin
between
the surface of the sample and the incoming beam was set to 45
◦
. As a sample, we have obtained a nominally 250 nm
thick Ta deposition on a Si
3
N
4
-membrane. The membrane has a thickness of nominally 1000 nm. Furthermore, a blank
Si3N4-membrane deposition was used to subtract the membrane contribution.
For both samples, transmission experiments were performed in the vicinity of the Ta-L absorption edges between 7 keV
and 13 keV. In addition, the X-ray fluorescence emission from the coated sample was measured for photon energies
ranging from about 10 keV to 13 keV. From these experiments, the Ta L-shell fluorescence yields and the Coster-Kronig
factors can be determined as follows.
The procedure to determine L-shell fluorescence yields, as well as Coster-Kronig factors using physically calibrated
instrumentation for reference-free X-ray spectrometry of PTB is already quite well established[
8
,
12
,
13
,
14
]. Here,
Sherman’s equation[
15
] provides the basis for the calculation of fluorescence intensities of thin foils. It is a product
of the incident monochromatic photon flux, a fluorescence production factor for a given shell
σS
, an instrumentation
factor containing the solid angle of detection and the detection efficiency and the self-attenuation correction factor. This
factor considers the attenuation of the photons on their way through the sample: For the incoming photons
Φ0(E0)
the
attenuation on their way to the point of interaction is considered, for the fluorescence photons Φd
i(E0)the attenuation
on their way from the point of interaction to the detector is considered. Employing tunable photon sources or as
recently shown also employing energy dispersive detectors[
16
], this factor can be easily determined by transmission
measurements for the relevant photon energies.
The fluorescence production factor σLi is defined as follows:
σL3(E0) = ωL3(τL3(E0) + f23τL2(E0)+[f13 +f12f23]τL1(E0)) (1)
σL2(E0) = ωL2(τL2(E0) + f12τL1(E0)) (2)
σL1(E0) = ωL1τL1(E0)(3)
It is depending on the photon energy
E0
and is calculated employing the respective subshell fluorescence yield
ωLi
, the
subshell photoionization cross sections
τLi(E0)
as well as the Coster-Kronig factors
fji
. The latter are irrelevant for
photon energies below the edge energy of the respective subshell as the photoelectric cross section is zero for energies
below the corresponding subshell threshold energy. Thus, for photon energies between
EL3
and
EL2
,
σL3(E0)
is
simply the product of fluorescence yield and photoionization cross section so that the fluorescence yield
ωL3
can be
derived. By further employing this selective excitation to the other edges, also the
L2
and
L1
subshell fluorescence
yields as well as the Coster-Kronig factors can be determined.
In other words, if EL3≤E0≤EL2, the fluorescence production factor for L3reduces to
σL3(E0)ρd =ωL3τL3(E0)ρd =Φd
i(E0)Mi,E0
Φ0(E0)Ω
4π
(4)
with
Mi,E0=(µS(E0)ρd
sin θin +µS(Ei)ρd
sin θout )
(1 −exp[−(µS(E0)ρd
sin θin +µS(Ei)ρd
sin θout )]),(5)
where
θin
and
θout
are incident and exit angles respectively. Due to the use of PTB’s physically calibrated instrumen-
tation for reference-free X-ray spectrometry, all of the relevant measures can be accessed. The fluorescence photon
flux
Φd
i(E0)
is derived from the recorded fluorescence spectra by means of a spectral deconvolution procedure. Here,
the detector response functions for all relevant fluorescence lines as well as relevant background contributions, e.g.
bremsstrahlung, originating from photo-electrons are included. In addition, we determine and apply fixed line sets for
each of the three L-shells in order to stabilize the deconvolution[
8
]. An exemplary spectrum including the deconvolution
is shown in fig. 1. The incident photon flux
Φ0(E0)
and the solid angle of detection
Ω
4π
are known due to the use of
calibrated instrumentation [
7
]. The sample specific attenuation correction factor
Mi,E0
for the incident (
E0
) – as well
as the fluorescence radiation (
Ei
) is calculated according to Eq. 5 using the experimentally determined sample specific
attenuation coefficients µS(E0)ρd and µS(Ei)ρd.
Employing the experimental
µS(E0)ρd
and
µS(Ei)ρd
values, one can calculate the total sample specific photoionization
cross sections
τS(E0)ρd
and
µS(Ei)ρd
by removing the scattering contributions. For this purpose, we derive the
relative scattering contribution at each photon energy from a database (e.g. X-raylib) and use this data to determine
τS(E0)ρd
. The thereby obtained photoionization cross sections are shown in figure 2 as blue dots. For the determination
2