Failure of neuron network coherence induced by SARS-CoV-2-infected astrocytes Sergey V. Stasenko1 Alexander E. Hramov23 and Victor B. Kazantsev124

2025-04-27 0 0 2.3MB 12 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Failure of neuron network coherence induced by
SARS-CoV-2-infected astrocytes
Sergey V. Stasenko1,*, Alexander E. Hramov2,3, and Victor B. Kazantsev1,2,4
1Laboratory of advanced methods for high-dimensional data analysis, Lobachevsky university, Nizhniy
Novgorod,603022, Russia
2Neuroscience and Cognitive Technology Lab, Innopolis University, Innopolis, 420500, Russia
3Department of New Cardiological Informational Technologies, Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, 410012,
Russia
4Laboratory for Neuromodeling, Neuroscience Research Institute, Samara State Medical University, Samara,
443099, Russia
*stasenko@neuro.nnov.ru
ABSTRACT
Coherent activations of brain neuron networks underlay many physiological functions associated with various behavioral
states. These synchronous fluctuations in the electrical activity of the brain are also referred to as brain rhythms. At the
cellular level, the rhythmicity can be induced by various mechanisms of intrinsic oscillations in neurons or network circulation of
excitation between synaptically coupled neurons. One of the specific mechanisms concerns the activity of brain astrocytes
that accompany neurons and can coherently modulate synaptic contacts of neighboring neurons, synchronizing their activity.
Recent studies have shown that coronavirus infection (Covid-19), entering the central nervous system and infecting astrocytes,
causes various metabolic disorders. Specifically, Covid-19 can depress the synthesis of astrocytic glutamate and GABA. It
is also known that in the postcovid state, patients may suffer from symptoms of anxiety and impaired cognitive functions,
which may be a consequence of disturbed brain rhythms. We propose a mathematical model of a spiking neural network
accompanied by astrocytes capable to generate quasi-synchronous rhythmic bursting discharges. The model predicts that
if the astrocytes are infected, and the release of glutamate is depressed, then normal burst rhythmicity suffers dramatically.
Interestingly, in some cases, the failure of network coherence may be intermittent with intervals of normal rhythmicity, or the
synchronization can completely disappears.
Introduction
The synchronization of the neural network activity at the cellular and network levels gives rise to rhythmic voltage fluctuations
traveling across brain regions, known as neuronal oscillations or brain waves
1,2
. Modulation of neural oscillations is provided
by the dynamic interplay between neuronal connectivity patterns, cellular membrane properties, intrinsic circuitry, speed of
axonal conduction, and synaptic delays
36
. The neural oscillations fluctuate between two main states, known as “up states”
and “down states”
7
. The network coherence providing by the up state in spatially organized cortical neural ensembles play
a crucial role for several sensory and motor processes, as well as for cognitive flexibility (i.e., attention, memory), thereby
playing a fundamental role in the brain’s basic functions
8,9
. Furthermore, different network dynamics (from slow to ultra-fast
oscillations) can change according to the behavioral state, with some frequency bands being associated with sleep, while other
frequencies predominate during arousal or conscious states1012.
Besides purely neuronal mechanisms, many recent studies revealed the essential contributions made by astrocytes to many
physiological brain functions,including synaptogenesis
13
, metabolic coupling
14
, nitrosative regulation of synaptic release
1517
,
synaptic transmission
18
, network oscillations
19
, and plasticity
20,21
. Astrocytes can play a significant role in the processing of
synaptic information through impact on pre- and post-synaptic neurons. This fact leads to the concept of a tripartite synapse
22,23
.
A part of the neurotransmitter released from the presynaptic terminals (i.e., glutamate) can diffuse out of the synaptic cleft and
bind to metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) on the astrocytic processes that are located near the neuronal synaptic
compartments. The neurotransmitter activates G-protein mediated signaling cascades that result in phospholipase C (PLC)
activation and insitol-1,4,5-trisphosphaste (IP3) production. The IP3 binds to IP3-receptors in the intracellular stores and
triggers
Ca2+
release into the cytoplasm. Such an increase in intracellular
Ca2+
can trigger the release of gliotransmitters
24
[e.g., glutamate, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), D-serine, and GABA] into the extracellular space. A gliotransmitter can affect
both the pre- and post-synaptic parts of the neuron. By binding to presynaptic receptors, it can either potentiate or depress
presynaptic release probability. One of the key pathways in the tripartite synapse is mediated by glutamate released by the
arXiv:2210.01014v1 [q-bio.NC] 3 Oct 2022
astrocyte
2527
. Such glutamate can potentially target presynaptic NMDA receptors, which increase the release probability
28
,
or presynaptic mGluRs, which decrease it
29
. Presynaptic kainate receptors exhibit a more complex modulation of synaptic
transmission through both metabotropic and ionotropic effects
30,31
. Based on experiment facts, many computational models
have been proposed taking into account neuron to astrocyte interactions to describe the interneuronal communication
3238
.
Many experimental works are shown that astrocytes can coordinate the neuronal network activations
3841
. Because astrocyte is
affected by a large number of synapses, the gliatransmission should also contribute to the effect of neuronal synchronization.
Particularly, it was demonstrated in a hippocampal network, where calcium elevations in astrocytes and subsequent glutamate
release led to the synchronous excitation of clusters of pyramidal neurons42,43.
Coronavirus COVID-19 has become a global challenge of the modern world, stimulating intensive research in many related
areas of science. Along with the development of vaccines, a fundamentally important global task is to investigate Covid-19
effects on different systems of human organisms. Recent studies have shown that coronavirus infection, entering the central
nervous system and infecting astrocytes, causes various metabolic disorders, one of which is a decrease in the synthesis of
astrocytic glutamate and GABA
44
. It is also known that in the postcovid state, patients may suffer from symptoms of anxiety and
impaired cognitive functions, which may be a consequence of disturbed brain rhythms. In this paper, we propose a mathematical
model of impact SARS-CoV-2-infected astrocyte on the ability to synchronize neural networks and produce brain rhythms. We
show that depending on the degree of disturbance in the synthesis of gliatransmitters neuronal network synchronization can be
partially or completely suppressed.
Results
First, let us consider how the astrocytes induced the appearance of quasi-synchronous bursting dynamics. If no astrocytic
feedback is activated, e.g.,
γY=0
, the network showed asynchronous spontaneous firing due to uncorrelated noisy component
of applied current,
Iext
stimulated all neurons (not shown in the figures). When the feedback is activated,
γY>0
, the model
starts to generate population burst discharges as illustrated in Fig. 3. Similar to previous modeling studies
3841 t
he astrocytes
started to coordinate neuronal activity, inducing a certain level of coherence in the network firing. On the one hand, each
astrocyte was activated integrating neuronal activity in its neighboring space. On the other hand, when astrocyte was activated
it facilitated synchronously the activation of accompanying neurons within a certain area. In a result, neurons generated
quasi-synchronous high-frequency burst discharges (Fig. 3). These discharges were synchronized with peaks of extracellular
glutamate concentration associated with the astrocytes activations. It should be noted that population burst dynamics is typical
for living networks formed in dissociated cortical (or hippocampal) neuronal culture models in vitro
4547
. In such biological
models normal bursting indicates normal activity. In different pathological conditions (hypoxic–ischemic injury, alpha or theta
coma or electrocerebral inactivity48) bursting fails what indicates the decrease of functional coherence in the network firing.
Next, we activated the virus pathological action in the model by increasing
γvirus >0
. Figure 4illustrates how network
activity changed in this case. The raster plot shows that normal bursting were interrupted by the intervals of asynchronous
uncorrelated firing. Corresponfing graphs of glutamate concentration in the right panels indicate that in these intervals the
astrocytes were partly (lower peaks) or completely (no peaks) inhibited. After this intervals bursts were spontaneously
recovered to normal sequences. So that, the result of SARS-CoV-2-infection at network level provokes to the failure of
normal synchronization at network level while each neuron in the network works fine and each synaptic connections stay well
functioning. Note, that for low values of
γvirus
associated with a “light” infection cases the intervals of uncorrelated firing are
quite shot indicating a kind intermittent behavior between long lasting normal synchronous (e.g. “laminar”) stages and rather
shot pathological asynchronous (e.g. “turbulent”) breaks.
The next prediction of the model concerns a gradual character of the infection influence. It means that higher level of
SARS-CoV-2 concentration in the organism will result in stronger pathological response. In terms of our model the increase of
γvirus
leads to the increase of intervals of “pathological” firing (Fig. 5). One can note that the number of normal bursts withing
the same sample window significantly descrease. In terms of neuro- and gliatransmitter concentrations (right panels of Fig.
5) we also noticed the decrease of functionality not only of all astrocytes but also neurons. Some of them become depressed
because of lack of sufficient amount glutamate to support normal excitatory transmission. So that, the higher SARS-CoV-2
concentration is exposed, then more astrocytes are infected and, hence, more “explicit” pathological synchrony breaks appear at
the level of network firing.
As one may expect now, further increase of
γvirus
completely inhibited the synchronization. It is illustrated in Fig. 6.
Correspondingly, all astrocytes failed to realease any glutamate. Note, however, that overall network firing still preserves
sustained by activations of excitatory neurons with relatively strong glutamatergic synapses. To quantify the gradual character
of the network dysfunction due to SARS-CoV-2 infection we calculated the quantity reflecting the average burst frequency
versus γvirus (Fig. 7). The graph represents monotonically descreading function vanishing at γvirus 1.
2/12
Discussion
We proposed a spiking neuron network model of synaptically coupled neurons accompanied of SARS-CoV-2-infected astrocytes.
The model accounts for astrocyte activation depending on the integrative level of neuronal firing and the astrocyte to neuron
feedback that is based on released gliatransmitter (glutamate) that facilitates group firing of neurons within the astrocyte territory.
We found that the astrocyte disfunction and failure of gliatransmitter release that was the consequence of SARS-CoV-2-infection
lead to failure of network synchronization. We have also illustrated that normal dynamics can be restored spontaneously,
interspersed with intervals of pathological arousal.
At present, cognitive dysfunctions are reported as one of the most dangerous consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in
post covid states. At the cognitive level, normal brain functioning can be associated with certain functional networks, where a
particular function is associated with long-range correlations between different neuronal groups. Failure of such correlations
may indicate the appearance of particular cognitive dysfunctions.
At the cellular level, functional synchronization is provided by coherent firing patterns of underlying spiking neuronal
circuits. Following in vitro biological models of neuronal cultures where the appearance of population bursts provides functional
synchronization, our mathematical model predicted that infected astrocytes might be responsible for failure of functional
synchronization and consequent cognitive dysfunctions.
Methods
Mathematical model of single neuron
To describe the dynamics of a single neuron, we take Izhikevich’s model
49
. It represents a compromise between computational
complexity and biophysical plausibility. Despite its computational simplicity, this model can reproduce a large number of
phenomena occurring in real neurons. The Izhikevich model is given in the form of a differential equations system (1):
(CmdVm
dt =k(VmVr)(VmVt)Um+Iext +Isyn,
dUm
dt =a(b(VmVr)Um).(1)
If VmVpeak , than
(Vm=c,
Um=Um+d,(2)
where
a,b,c,d,k,Cm
are the different parameters of the neuron.
Vm
is the potential difference on the inside and outside of the
membrane, and
Um
is a "recovery variable" describing the process of activation and deactivation of potassium and sodium
membrane channels, respectively. As a result, we have negative feedback concerning the dynamics of the potential
Vm
on the
cell membrane. The resting potential value in the model lies in the range from –70 to –60 mV. Its value is determined by the
parameter
b
, which describes the sensitivity of the recovery variable to subthreshold potential fluctuations on the neuronal cell
membrane. The parameter
a
sets the characteristic time scale of the change in the recovery variable
u
. The
Vpeak
value limits
the spike amplitude. Parameters
c
and
d
specify the values of
Vm
and
u
after spike generation.
Iext
is the externally applied
current. The neuron model is in an excitable mode and will demonstrate the generation of spikes in response to an applied
current.
Isyn
is the sum of synaptic currents from all neurons with which this neuron is connected. Synaptic currents were
calculated as follows:
Isyn =yi jwi j,(3)
so that
Isyn
represents the weighted sum of all synaptic currents of postsynaptic neurons with
wi j
denoting the weights for
glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses between neurons. For excitatory and inhibitory contacts, the weights have positive
and negative signs, respectively. Variables
yi j
denote the output signal (synaptic neurotransmitter) from the
i
th neuron to the
j
th neuron which involved in generation of
Isyn
. In our model, the number of synaptic connections is
N2×p
, where
N
is the
number of neurons,
p
is the probability of communication between two random neurons and equal 0.1 (
10%
of connections).
Each synaptic weight was set randomly for all connections in the range from 20 to 60. If a spike is generated on the presynaptic
neuron, a jump in the synaptic current occurs on the postsynaptic one, which further decays exponentially. As a result, synaptic
neurotransmitter concentration, yi j, was calculated as follows:
yi j(t) = yi j(ti)exp(t/τy)if,ts<t<ts+1,
yi j(ts0) + 1 if,t=ts,(4)
3/12
摘要:

FailureofneuronnetworkcoherenceinducedbySARS-CoV-2-infectedastrocytesSergeyV.Stasenko1,*,AlexanderE.Hramov2,3,andVictorB.Kazantsev1,2,41Laboratoryofadvancedmethodsforhigh-dimensionaldataanalysis,Lobachevskyuniversity,NizhniyNovgorod,603022,Russia2NeuroscienceandCognitiveTechnologyLab,InnopolisUniver...

展开>> 收起<<
Failure of neuron network coherence induced by SARS-CoV-2-infected astrocytes Sergey V. Stasenko1 Alexander E. Hramov23 and Victor B. Kazantsev124.pdf

共12页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:12 页 大小:2.3MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-27

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 12
客服
关注