1 Nonlocal Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communication

2025-04-27 0 0 841.99KB 13 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
1
Nonlocal Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for
Wireless Communication:
Modeling and Physical Layer Aspects
Amine Mezghani, Faouzi Bellili, and Ekram Hossain
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada.
Emails: {amine.mezghani,faouzi.bellili,ekram.hossain}@umanitoba.ca
Abstract—Conventional Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces
(RIS) for wireless communications have a local position-
dependent (phase-gradient) scattering response on the surface.
We consider more general RIS structures, called nonlocal (or
redirective) RIS, that are capable of selectively manipulate the
impinging waves depending on the incident angle. Redirective
RIS have nonlocal wavefront-selective scattering behavior and
can be implemented using multilayer arrays such as metal-
enses. We demonstrate that this more sophisticated type of
surfaces has several advantages such as: lower overhead through
coodebook-based reconfigurability, decoupled wave manipula-
tions, and higher efficiency in multiuser scenarios via multi-
functional operation. Additionally, redirective RIS architectures
greatly benefit form the directional nature of wave propagation at
high frequencies and can support integrated fronthaul and access
(IFA) networks most efficiently. We also discuss the scalability
and compactness issues and propose efficient nonlocal RIS archi-
tectures such as fractionated lens-based RIS and mirror-backed
phase-masks structures that do not require additional control
complexity and overhead while still offering better performance
than conventional local RIS.
Index Terms—Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces, local and
nonlocal metasurfaces, Directional communication, angular fil-
tering/conversion, RF routing, Control overhead, Retroreflective
channel estimation, Integrated (in-band) Fronthaul and Access,
Physically secured communication.
I. INTRODUCTION
The network capacity and coverage of previous cellular
systems have been expanded mainly by deploying more access
points and adding more frequency bands. Despite the rapid
technological progress, a cost-effective way to deliver ubiqui-
tous multi-Gpbs mobile data transmissions anywhere/anytime
remains however still a challenging problem, since all current
cellular technologies become very capital intensive beyond a
certain average rate per user threshold [1].
Higher network capacity and peak data rates are theoret-
ically conceivable at the mmWave and THz spectrum, due
to the availability of larger bandwidths and the realizability
of more directional transmissions in 3D. The main challenge
for these spectrum parts is, however, the reduced propagation
range and exacerbated blockage issues in addition to the radio
frequency (RF) power limitations, especially in the uplink. As
a consequence, mmWave/TeraHz mobile access intrinsically
requires small-cell deployment with a line-of-sight (LOS) path
or strong mirror-like reflective paths and is currently targeting
ultra-high-density areas. Another issue is the traffic variation
and the strongly asymmetric performance between the uplink
and the downlink, thereby limiting the deployment scenarios.
It becomes clear then that more innovations in network
design and communication techniques are needed to enable
wider deployment of mmWave/TeraHz technologies. In fact, a
simple expansion by adding radio nodes with more backhaul
infrastructure significantly increases cost and complexity while
potentially leading to an underutilized system [1] due to the
stronger impact of time-variant user distribution and traffic
fluctuations on dense networks. It is also worth mentioning that
user-centric generalized coverage by multiple base stations is
also critical even in lower frequencies. In addition, controlled
cell range extension for network resilience (to node failures for
instance) or mobile broadband coverage in rural areas is also
an open problem even at sub-6GHz frequencies necessitating
concepts for low-cost flexible network edge components. This
calls for innovation in network design that could enable an
access point to multiplex across different areas, optimizing
both spatial coverage and temporal utilization of the network.
To address these issues, the use of reconfigurable intelligent
surfaces (RIS) [2], [3], also known as smart passive and active
(network-controlled) repeaters, is being widely investigated in
academia and industry as a potentially low-cost, low-power
stopgap solution for mitigating the coverage issue of future
networks. While densification is unavoidable for widespread
service availability, another equally important goal is to reduce
the number of required sophisticated and energy-intensive
nodes/cells in the network and distribute them sparsely and
flexibly (closer to existing fiber points of presence) so as
to make mobile mmWave/TeraHz communication economi-
cally viable. To be considered as a cheaper, competitive, and
economically scalable alternative to small cells for network
expansion, RIS-based edge nodes scattered around a central
baseband node have to meet the following criteria [3]
Low-power/quasi-passive (e.g., solar-powered), low-cost,
low-maintenance, lightweight, and easy-to-deploy and
operate nodes for instance on an aerial platform
Full-duplex operation, i.e., on-channel manipulation (as
opposed to standard relays) and with very low latency
(data forwarding with no processing delay)
Restricted RF and physical layer capabilities (transparent
layer-0 nodes with only control channel receiver and no
transmitter chain)
In-band or out-of-band IoT-dedicated remote control link
(e.g., via a small control bandwidth partition), which can
arXiv:2210.05928v2 [cs.IT] 3 Apr 2024
2
High site/Gateway (multifaceted)
Ultra-high capacity
RIS
Fig. 1: Streetlight-mounted RIS nodes assisting an ultra-high
capacity cell site.
be decoded without demodulating the entire waveform).
Furthermore, the form factor and aesthetic aspects of future
wireless equipment will also be critical to not further impact
the urban landscape and to keep wireless radiations and
deployments at levels that are acceptable by the general public
while meeting the levels already imposed by regulations.
In this context, new antenna designs and deployment strate-
gies are being considered to enable multipurpose reconfig-
urable intelligent active/passive surfaces/scatterers (RIS) that
can favorably alter wave propagation. These antennas are
ultrathin surfaces with subwavelength (i.e., microscopic) struc-
tures, also known as metasurfaces with 2D applied/induced
magnetic and electric currents along the surface [2]. In the
context of passive metasurfaces, the subwavelength structure
offers a flexible and efficient wavefront manipulation such as
beam-steering of the incident wave by optimizing the surface
impedance distribution. A popular use case for RIS is when
there are obstructions between the transmitter and the receiver
that lead to a communication failure. By bending/deflecting RF
beams in 3D, one can easily navigate around the obstructions
along appropriate trajectories (c.f. Fig. 1). For sub-6 GHz
frequencies, RIS can be used to eliminate the coverage gap in
rural areas by closing multiple links to far-away base stations
on the edge of the network that are generally underutilized as
shown in Fig. 2.
While the majority of prior work has focused on phased
reflective1RIS architecture with local wave manipulation [2],
recent research papers have considered nonlocal designs such
as directive reconfigurable surfaces [4], [5], layered RIS with
multi-plane wave conversion [6], [7], as well RIS with non-
diagonal phase-shift matrices [8]. However, the existing RIS-
based directive communication designs rely, for instance, on
the use of separate reception and re-transmission arrays that
are connected in a back-to-back manner, thereby resulting in
a very spatially selective wave manipulation. In contrast to
1For simplicity, transmissive RIS configurations are also categorized as
being reflective throughout this paper.
RIS
Rural area
Suburban area Suburban area
Fig. 2: Closing the coverage gap in rural areas with RIS-
enabled multiple data pipes that exploit the extra capacity of
lightly loaded base stations.
reflective configurations, redirective systems are very common
in practice and are known as bent-pipe (through) relays in
satellite communications and as (network-controlled) smart
repeaters in the 5G industry [9], [10]. From the metamaterial
perspective, redirective antenna systems can be regarded as
nonlocal metasurfaces due to their angle-dependent processing
[11]. Nonlocal RIS design offers additional degrees of freedom
to design wave manipulations that are not possible with
conventional local designs. However, designs based on layered
RIS [6], [7] suffer from higher complexity, control overhead,
and losses as compared with the conventional local design.
Local metasurfaces only provide pointwise scattering re-
sponses and have restricted functionalities due to the local
power conservation requirement. By contrast, nonlocal meta-
surfaces allow for more general responses that are angular (or
wave vector) dependent [11]–[13]. Throughout the paper, RIS
design that is implemented using local metasurfaces is also
described as reflective, whereas nonlocal metasurface-based
design is also termed redirective RIS.
The question of which type of RIS scattering, configuration,
and controllability to use for cost-effective mmWave//TeraHz
networks with low control and training overhead remains,
however, an open research question. This paper is an attempt
to provide a systematic comparison of several aspects of these
two different types of RIS deployment. While some ques-
tions remain open (regarding compactness and scalability),
our conclusion is quite in favor of network configurations
with redirective RIS-based quasi-passive nodes, which provide
better scaling in terms of aperture, bandwidth, control, and
estimation overhead. We also show that surprisingly simple
salable nonlocal RIS designs that do not require additional
complexity or overhead as compared to local designs are
potentially possible while offering better performance.
Notation: Vectors and matrices are denoted by lower- and
upper-case italic boldface letters. The operators ()T,()H,
tr(), and ()stand for transpose, Hermitian (i.e., conjugate
transpose), trace, and complex conjugate, respectively. The
identity matrix is denoted as Iand the size will be understood
from the context. All vectors are in column-wise orientation
by default and xiis the i-th element of x. The i-th column
of a matrix Xis denoted as xiwhile [X]i,jstands for its
(ith, jth) entry. We represent the Kronecker and Hadamard
product of vectors and matrices by the operators "" and "",
respectively. Additionally, both Diag(X)and Diag(x)return
3
π
2θ
φ
a
a
bα,1
aα,1 bα,m
aα,m
aβ(θ,φ)
bβ(θ,φ)
Fig. 3: Antenna scattering with maccessible ports.
a diagonal matrix by, respectively, keeping only the diagonal
elements in X, or placing the vector xon its main diagonal.
Finally, jis the imaginary unit (i.e., j2=1), and the notation
is used for definitions.
II. PHYSICALLY-CONSISTENT MODELING OF RIS
The modeling of antenna arrays or reconfigurable surfaces
is becoming critical for the design and optimization of fu-
ture wireless systems [2], [3]. In this section, we provide a
general modeling methodology for antenna arrays as well as
reconfigurable surfaces based on the linear scattering theory.
Contrary to prior work [14], we adapt the linear scattering
description rather than the impedance description since it is
easier to measure and gives a more informative and intuitive
interpretation of the model. In particular, we show that the
conventional model that ignores the mutual coupling effects
can be regarded as a first-order approximation of the physically
consistent model.
A. Linear Scattering Model
As shown in Fig 3, the electromagnetic properties of an
antenna array or a scatterer are described by its radiat-
ing/receiving patterns, the space-side scattering pattern, as
well as the electrical multi-port behavior of its terminals
[15] (assuming lumped elements connected to the structure).
For simplicity, we treat the electromagnetic field, which is
generally a vectorial complex quantity, as a complex-valued
scalar quantity (e.g., considering a single polarization). At
each mth accessible port, the forward and backward traveling
(voltage) wave phasors along the antenna feed line are denoted
by aα,mand bα,m, respectively. At a distant sphere, the angular
transmission characteristic of a certain polarization when the
antenna port mis connected to a wave-source amplitude aα,m
(in [W]) at port mis defined as (also known as complex
pattern)
sm(θ,φ) = lim
r→∞ jrejkr E(m)(θ,φ,r)
aα,mp10,(1)
where η0is the characteristic impedance of free space and
E(m)(θ,φ,r)is the corresponding generated electrical far-
field. These element-embedded complex patterns, sm(θ,φ),
are stacked together to form the receiving/transmitting charac-
teristic vector sαβ (θ,φ). Assuming single polarization hemi-
spherical radiation, the general antenna array can now be char-
acterized by the linear scattering description for the terminal
side
bα=Sααaα+Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
sαβ (θ,φ)aβ(θ,φ)sinθdφdθ,(2)
where aα[aα,1,. . . ,aα,M]Tand Sαα is the scattering
matrix . For the space-side, the angular spectra of the outgoing
propagating wave phasors bβ(θ,φ)are expressed as a linear
functional of the incoming one aβ(θ,φ)as well as the port
incident phasor
bβ(θ,φ) = sαβ (θ,φ)Taα+
Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
sββ (θ,φ,θ,φ)aβ(θ,φ)sinθdφdθ,
(3)
where sββ (θ,φ,θ,φ)is the wave back-scattering character-
istic which is in general hard to determine experimentally.
Ideally, sββ (θ,φ,θ,φ)is effectively negligible or is just
considered as part of the fixed (direct) communication channel.
In the context of RIS deployment, the antenna ports are
terminated by loads characterized by the load scattering matrix
SL, i.e., bα=SLaα. Consequently, we get the total scattering
bβ(θ,φ) = sαβ (θ,φ)T(S1
LSαα)1×
Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
sαβ (θ,φ)aβ(θ,φ)sinθdφdθ+
Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
sββ (θ,φ,θ,φ)aβ(θ,φ)sinθdφdθ
| {z }
Residual scattering
.
(4)
For passive RIS, the spectral radius of this scattering opera-
tor (aβ(θ,φ)bβ(θ,φ)) is less or equal to one. That is, the
scattered power is less than or equal to the impinging power
regardless of the impinging wave
Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
|bβ(θ,φ)|2sinθdφdθZπ
2
0Zπ
π
|aβ(θ,φ)|2sinθdφdθ.
(5)
If the antenna is lossless then we have equality and the
operator is unitary with all eigenvalues having unit absolute
values. A simplistic approach that is commonly used in prior
work is to use the Neumann series approximation
(S1
LSαα)1=
X
k=0
(SLSαα)kSL=SL+SLSααSL+. . . ,
(6)
thus, bβ(θ,φ)main-refl. sαβ (θ,φ)TSL×
Zπ
2
0Zπ
π
sαβ (θ,φ)aβ(θ,φ)sinθdφdθ,
(7)
which neglects the residual backscattering and the high-order
multiple reflections between the antenna and load given by (6).
This applies for Sαα =0(or ρ(SLSαα)1), i.e., perfectly
matched array (or high losses). In general, the exact expression
might give better results since (S1
LSαα)1might have
singular values larger than 1 as opposed to SL. Nevertheless,
the main reflection approximation in (7) has a more tractable
mathematical structure for optimizing the reactive load SL,
the reason for which it is widely used in the literature.
摘要:

1NonlocalReconfigurableIntelligentSurfacesforWirelessCommunication:ModelingandPhysicalLayerAspectsAmineMezghani,FaouziBellili,andEkramHossainUniversityofManitoba,Winnipeg,MB,R3T5V6,Canada.Emails:{amine.mezghani,faouzi.bellili,ekram.hossain}@umanitoba.caAbstract—ConventionalReconfigurableintelligents...

展开>> 收起<<
1 Nonlocal Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communication.pdf

共13页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:13 页 大小:841.99KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-27

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 13
客服
关注