
A Problem in the Statistical Description of Beta-Delayed Neutron Emission
Oliver Gorton1,2,∗,Calvin Johnson1,∗∗ , and Jutta Escher2,∗∗∗
1San Diego State University, California, USA
2Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA
Abstract. Reaction measurements on fission products are being planned at both Argonne National Lab and
at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams. These indirect experiments produce specific short-lived nuclei via beta
decay, and the subsequent neutron and gamma emission are studied. Some initial experiments found a surprising
overabundance of gamma emission, which theory has yet to explain. To remedy this, we are developing an
integrated nuclear data workflow that connects advanced nuclear shell model codes for describing the beta
decay with a contemporary nuclear reaction model code.
Beta decay is the mechanism for element transmuta-
tion towards stability, and plays an important role in com-
petition with neutron-capture in the formation of heavy
elements: Understanding this is one of the central tasks
of the nuclear theory community and the new Facility for
Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) [1, 2]. A less common, yet
important [3] process is the emission of one or more neu-
trons immediately following beta decay in a process called
beta-delayed neutron emission (BDNE), depicted in Fig-
ure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic depiction of beta-delayed neutron emission
for the case of 94Rb. The distribution of states populated by beta
decay can be predicted with a microscopic structure model like
quasiparticle random-phase approximation or shell model. The
decay of the neutron and gamma emitting nucleus (94Sr) is his-
torically described by a statistical model, assuming compound
nuclear decay.
∗e-mail: ogorton@sdsu.edu
∗∗ e-mail: cjohnson@sdsu.edu
∗∗∗ e-mail: escher1@llnl.gov
1 Statistical description of BDNE does not
explain experiments
Theoretical description of BDNE has been an ongoing
challenge since the late 1970’s [4]. The idea of selectiv-
ity[4] of states populated by beta decay, leading to non-
statistical neutron emission, was proposed to explain peak-
features seen in delayed neutron spectra. These effects
were almost explained away by the Pandemonium effect
[5], which indicated that such peaks were artifacts due to
detector limitations. Others showed that in some cases,
(a) statistical models of BDNE could reproduce the peaks
if excited states in the residual nucleus were included
[6], and (b) that states populated in beta decay could be
strongly connected to excited states in the final nucleus
[7], supporting selectivity. At the close of the decade, the
nuances were better understood, including the importance
beta-decay strength function shape and nuclear level den-
sities [8, 9].
With the development of total absorption gamma-ray
spectroscopy (TAGS) [10, 11] and its application to the
study of BDNE [12–14], the Pandemonium effect can be
avoided. Even so, the statistical description in some cases
significantly under-predicts the intensity of emitted pho-
tons from TAGS experiments, e.g. in [13]. Thus, BDNE
remains an important and unresolved modeling challenge.
There are three hypotheses which may explain this.
Hyp. 1: Photon-decay strength function is stronger
than assumed. This is the simplest explanation: if the
photon-strength function is enhanced, the nucleus formed
by beta decay will de-excite below the neutron separa-
tion energy before delayed neutrons are emitted. If this
is the explanation, then many neutron capture rates will
also have to be re-evaluated, especially for astrophysical
interests.
Hyp. 2: Forbidden beta decay is stronger than as-
sumed, blocking high-l neutron emission. If forbidden
transitions play a significant role in these neutron-rich
arXiv:2210.05904v2 [nucl-th] 22 Oct 2022