
Heppe et al. MeV photons generation in a carbon plasma channel
radiation-dominated regime. Thus, this scheme not only produces higher yields of γ-photons but also the
self-generated magnetic field helps in collimating the generated photon beam in a 10◦lobe around the laser
propagation axis. This high-directionality of the photon beams can be exploited for producing electron-
positron pairs by the Breit-Wheeler process in colliding two γ-rays beams setup in a laboratory; Wang
et al. (2020). Key findings of the scheme are that for high-Z e.g. carbon plasmas at incident powers in the
range PL≤5PW, the laser to photon energy conversion efficiency drops for incident laser power in the
excess of PL≈5PW; Wang et al. (2020). Also, the efficiency of the γphotons generation seems to peak
around τ∼45 fs laser pulse duration for laser powers PL≤10 PW at laser intensity IL= 5 ×1022
W/cm2; Wang et al. (2020). At this laser intensity, radiation reaction can be modeled classically and
stochastic effects involved in quantum radiation reaction are negligible; Kumar et al. (2013).
The upcoming laser facilities such as ELI and others; Al´
eonard et al. (2011); Papadopoulos et al. (2016);
xce (2017); vul (2022) are expected to provide multi-petawatt laser systems. These multi-petawatt laser
systems are to rely on short laser pulse durations τ∼20 fs as significantly increasing the energy contained
in the laser pulse is challenging due to technical reasons associated with material damage etc. Thus,
it is instructive to examine the generation of γ-photons with much shorter laser pulses e.g. τ≤45
fs. Also these multi-petawatt laser pulses can be focused to smaller beam radii ≤10µm resulting in
laser intensities (IL≥1×1023 W/cm2) that can enter the so-called quantum-electrodynamic regime,
in which radiation reaction has a stochastic nature and it significantly affects the electron dynamics and
consequently γ-photons generation. Moreover, generation of pair-production can also be important in
this regime. Motivated by these considerations, we study the generation of γ-photons in a laser-plasma
channel, for the laser power exceeding PL= 5 PW. The plasma channel used is a structured carbon
plasma target and the laser pulse has the intensity IL= 2.65 ×1023 W/cm2. Further, we also chose
a conical plasma channel to optimize the generation of γ-photons since conical shaped targets provide
higher laser to plasma electron energy conversion efficiencies; Vranic et al. (2018). We carry out all
simulations for both target geometries for 20 fs and 40 fs pulse durations.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in Sec.2 we discuss the simulation setup and plasma
dynamics and the physical process of γphotons generation. In sections 3.2 and 3.3, we show results
from planar and conical plasma channels, respectively. In Sec.3.4, we compare our results with previous
simulations results. Finally we conclude the discussions in Sec.4.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
We carry out 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, employing the open source PIC code
SMILEI; Derouillat et al. (2018). The simulation domain is 120 ×8µm(x×y) with a cell size of
0.02 ×0.01 µmsimulating a time period of Tsim ≈2500 fs, divided into timesteps of ∆t≈0.02 fs.
A linearly polarized laser pulse with wavelength λL= 0.8µmimpinges on a structured carbon ion
plasma target located at x≥10 µmfrom the left-boundary. We use 16 particles per cell for electrons
as well as ions. To ensure quasi-neutrality in our simulation, the ion density is chosen to be ni=ne/6,
where neis the plasma electron density. Open boundary conditions are used in x-direction while
periodic boundary conditions are employed in y-direction. The laser pulse has a normalized amplitude
a0=eE0/mω0c=eA0/mec2= 350 (corresponding laser intensity IL≈2.65 ×1023 W cm−2)and a
pulse duration of τ= 40 fs as well as τ= 20 fs (measured at FWHM), where eis the electronic charge,
cis the velocity of light in vacuum, E0(A0) and ω0are the laser electric field (vector potential) and
frequency, respectively. The core of the plasma channel has density ne,ch = 37 ncr while the surrounding
bulk plasma is denser ne,B = 184 ncr, as also simulated before; Stark et al. (2016); Jansen et al. (2018).
Frontiers 2