
2
with spectrum given by the weight vector, spec↓(ˆ
Γ) = w.
This spectral condition defines the set EN(w) of N-
particle density operators
EN(w)≡ {ˆ
Γ|ˆ
Γ = ˆ
Γ†,ˆ
Γ≥0,TrN[ˆ
Γ] = 1,spec↓(ˆ
Γ) = w}.
(2)
Then, the GOK variational principle reads [12]
Ew≡
D
X
j=1
wjEj= min
ˆ
Γ∈EN(w)
TrNhˆ
Γˆ
Hi.(3)
Applying the Levy-Lieb constrained search [15, 16] to
this variational principle for excited states yields
Ew(ˆ
h) = min
ˆ
Γ∈EN(w)
TrN[(ˆ
h+ˆ
W)ˆ
Γ]
= min
ˆγ∈E1
N(w)hmin
EN(w)3ˆ
Γ7→ˆγ
TrN[(ˆ
h+ˆ
W)ˆ
Γ]i
= min
ˆγ∈E1
N(w)hTr1[ˆ
hˆγ] + Fw(ˆγ)i,
(4)
where we defined the universal functional Fwwhose do-
main is given by E1
N(w) = NTrN−1(EN(w)). For sim-
plicity we used in Eq. (3) the same symbol for the one-
particle Hamiltonian ˆ
hon the N-particle and the one-
particle Hilbert space. It is worth stressing here that the
set E1
N(w) is typically not convex [17, 18]. Moreover, Fw
is usually not (locally) convex, i.e., there exist convex re-
gions on which Fwis not convex, even for those special
cases with convex domain E1
N(w). A well-known example
for the latter scenario is the ground state Hubbard dimer
functional for the singlet spin sector which is recovered
for the weight vector w= (1,0, . . .) [6, 19, 20].
One of the main achievements of Refs. [8–10, 18]
was to overcome the too intricate w-ensemble N-
representability constraints that define the domain
E1
N(w) of the universal functional Fw. In analogy to Val-
one’s ground state RDMFT [21] this was achieved by per-
forming an exact convex relaxation. Indeed the energy
Ew(ˆ
h) remains unaffected by replacing the non-convex
sets EN(w) and E1
N(w) by their respective convex hulls,
EN(w)≡conv EN(w),
E1
N(w)≡NTrN−1EN(w)= conv E1
N(w).(5)
In particular, inserting Eq. (5) in the Levy-Lieb con-
strained search replaces Fwby its lower convex envelope
Fw(ˆγ)≡min
EN
(w)3ˆ
Γ7→ˆγ
TrN[ˆ
Γˆ
W]
= conv (Fw(ˆγ)) .(6)
It was exactly this convex relaxation which allowed us in
Refs. [8–10] to obtain a feasible functional theory thanks
to a comprehensive characterization of the set E1
N(w) for
bosons and fermions. To be more specific, we derived a
compact description of the corresponding spectral set
Σ(w)≡spec( E1
N(w)) ,(7)
in terms of finitely many linear constraints [8–10, 18].
Those conditions represent nothing else than a complete
generalization of Pauli’s exclusion principle to mixed
states of bosons and fermions, respectively. Therefore,
the challenging task addressed in this paper is to derive
the first w-ensemble functionals. This should initiate
the development of more elaborated functional approxi-
mations in analogy to the developments of ground state
RDMFT functionals for fermions [22–34] which were in-
spired by or even based on the Hartree-Fock functional
introduced in the seminal work by Lieb [11].
III. DERIVATION OF THE UNIVERSAL
FUNCTIONAL FOR THE SYMMETRIC
BOSE-HUBBARD DIMER
As our first proof-of-principle for w-ensemble RDMFT,
we derive in this section the exact w-ensemble func-
tional for the symmetric Bose-Hubbard dimer. Due to
the equivalence of this system to the Fermi-Hubbard
dimer for two electrons in their singlet sector, the cor-
responding results can be translated to fermionic w-
ensemble RDMFT in a straightforward manner. Un-
derstanding the w-ensemble functional and its domain
for this model is particularly interesting since the Bose-
Hubbard dimer constitutes the building block of the Hub-
bard model widely used in the field of ultracold quan-
tum gases. Besides this, the Hubbard dimer model is
widely used throughout RDMFT and density functional
theory to illustrate conceptual aspects of functional the-
ory [19, 20, 35–50]. The Hamiltonian for spinless bosons
on two lattice sites reads
ˆ
H=−tˆa†
LˆaR+ ˆa†
RˆaL+UX
j=L,R
ˆnj(ˆnj−1) ,(8)
where the first term describes hopping at a rate tbe-
tween the left (L) and right (R) lattice site. The second
term describes the Hubbard on-site interaction with cou-
pling strength Uand ˆnj= ˆa†
jˆajis the occupation number
operator.
In the case of periodic boundary conditions, the Hamil-
tonian in Eq. (8) is translationally invariant. This implies
that the total momentum Pis conserved, i.e., Pis a good
quantum number. As a result, the minimization in the
constrained search formalism in Eq. (4) can be restricted
to all ˆ
Γ∈ EN(w, P ) in the chosen symmetry sector with
fixed P. Then, it is possible to establish a separate func-
tional in each symmetry sector instead of a single more
involved functional referring to all P. Moreover, every
1RDM ˆγis diagonal in momentum representation. In the
following, we consider the case of N= 2 spinless bosons
and restrict to repulsive interactions, i.e., U > 0. Then,
the natural occupation numbers are given by the momen-
tum occupation numbers np≥0 restricted through the
normalization Ppnp= 2.
It is also worth noticing that for the symmetric Bose-
Hubbard dimer the translational invariance is equivalent