
what it’s like to be her husband and collaborator. Unfortunately, we’ve all heard so many
eccentric-writer stories at conventions that anything I could say would be redundant. I think I’ll let this
topic slide with merely a sidebar. Psychologists generally agree that a major childhood trauma will often
result in people’s becoming thieves, murderers, drug addicts, prostitutes, or writers. Generally, I’m
pleased that Diane chose the last. However, when the light clicks on at 3:00 A.M. because Captain Kirk
is[viii]whispering something into Diane’s ear, I must admit that those thieves and murderers don’t look so
bad.
Another, always popular possibility would be to take a humorous look at our favorite shared-universe. I
could, for instance, fantasize about being able to remove one scene from the series or the movies and
rewrite it to my specifications. Which scene would it be? No, that might get me into trouble. And while
Star Trek parodies are a lot of fun for true Trek fans, they are often misinterpreted by non-Trek people
(the unclean) as ridicule ofStar Trek.
How about commenting on some of the technical and scientific ... uh ... liberties that were occasionally
taken during the series to move the plot along. No, that would be longer than the book.
Let’s try another tack.
How, it is so often asked, could a twenty-year-old television show develop such a vast and loyal
following? Even the fans can’t reach an agreement on this. Some people feel that theStar Trek
characters, the “Four from theEnterprise” especially, are a classic combination of compassion, humor,
and conflict that the years cannot diminish. Others argue that the series itself always aspired to be “a cut
above,” its episodes not directed, like so much of television, at an audience with the collective IQ of a
swarm of lobotomized houseflies. While I agree with these observations, I think that there is an even
more important aspect ofStar Trek that has made it so enduring—one that is often overlooked.
For several thousand years, philosophical and religious leaders have been preaching that man is basically
evil. WhenStar Trek was conceived in the 1960’s, this fact seemed to be demonstrated by the events all
around us. We were plagued with war, racial unrest, pollution, overpopulation, and the threat of nuclear
annihilation. These combined to support the belief that the human race was going to have a very short and
miserable future on this planet. Those who looked into this future envisioned a massively overpopulated,
polluted world of such poverty and violence that we would all be locked into a daily life-and-death
struggle for our basic needs. A very depressing outlook, to say the least.Star Trek thumbed its nose at
our culture’s Chicken Littles by giving us a much more reassuring look at humanity.
The overall theme ofStar Trek must surely be that we have a grand future. Yes, we will have troubles.
Some of them may seem insurmountable. But mankind is not just an upstart species, an aberration of
nature destined to cause its own inevitable slide back into the muck.[ix]The creatorsof Star Trek wanted
us to know that weare special, weare in charge of our destinies. That destiny can be a fine one as long as
we never allow the problems of today to overwhelm our aspirations for the future. Diane and I consider it
an honor to be part of theStar Trek universe and we will always try to maintain the respect for mankind
that has madeStar Trek an ever-increasing force in the social consciousness of today.
Final Frontieris aStar Trek historical, taking place twenty-five years before James Kirk’s time aboard
theEnterprise (the framework involving James Kirk takes place immediately after the television episode
“The City on the Edge of Forever,” and the reader may wish to refer to it). Diane and I have worked
conscientiously to project backward on both technology and philosophy, to a point where we can see the
emergence of the Trek familiar to us all. This is before everything—before starship technology was
polished, before Federation policy was tested, before captains really knew how to handle what they
encountered. It involves the inevitable conflicts between our philosophies, our aspirations, and the brutal