
Fascinating story. And completely true. Jeremy was responsible for checking newspaper accounts of
maulings and other potential werewolf activity. In the Arizona Republic he'd found the article describing
the second kill. The first hadn't made it into the papers—one dead homeless person wasn't news. I'd
gone to investigate, arriving too late to help the third victim, but in time to ensure there wasn't a fourth.
The guilty mutt was buried under six feet of desert sand. The Pack didn't look kindly on man-killers.
We hadn't been worried about the police investigation. In my experience, homicide detectives are a
bright bunch, smart enough to know there's no such thing as werewolves. If they found mauling with
canine evidence, they saw a dog kill. If they found mauling with human evidence, they saw a psychopath
kill. If they found mauling with both human and canine evidence, they saw a psychopath with a dog or a
murder site disturbed by a dog. They never, ever, saw a partially eaten body,
footprints, and dog fur and said, "My God, we've got a werewolf!" Even wackos who believed in
werewolves didn't see such murders as werewolf kills. They were too busy looking for crazed,
half-human beasts who bay at the full moon, snatch babies from cradles, and leave prints that
mysteriously change from paws to feet. So when I read something like this, I had to worry about what
other information the vendor was selling.
The "media welcome" part worried me too. Almost all believe.com listings ended with "media need not
inquire." Though vendors pretended the warning was meant to discourage tabloid journalists who'd
mangle their stories, they were really worried that a legit reporter would show up and humiliate them.
When I went to investigate such claims, I used the guise of being a member of a paranormal society. This
time, since the vendor had no problem with media, I was pretending to be a journalist, which wasn't
much of a stretch, since that was my profession, though my typical beat was freelancing articles on
Canadian politics, which never included any mention of demonic phenomena, though it might explain the
rise of the neo-conservatives.
Once in Pittsburgh, I caught a cab, registered at my hotel, dropped off my stuff, and headed to the
meeting. I was supposed to meet the vendor— Ms. Winterbourne—outside a place called Tea for Two.
It was exactly what it sounded like, a cutesy shop selling afternoon tea and light lunches. The exterior was
whitewashed brick with pale pink and powder blue trim. Rows of antique teapots lined the windowsills.
Inside were tiny bistro tables with white linen cloths and wrought-iron chairs. Then, after all this work to
make the place as nauseatingly sweet as possible, someone had stuck a piece of hand-markered
cardboard in the front window informing passersby that the shop also sold coffee, espresso, latte, and
"other coffee-based beverages."
Ms. Winterbourne had promised to meet me in front of the shop at three-thirty. I arrived at
three-thirty-five, peeked inside, and didn't find anyone waiting, so I went out again. Loitering in front of a
tearoom wasn't like hanging around a coffee shop. After a few minutes, people inside began staring. A
server came out and asked if she could "help
me." I assured her I was waiting for someone, in case she mistook me for a vagrant soliciting leftover
scones.
At four o'clock, a young woman approached. When I turned, she smiled. She wasn't very tall, more than
a half-foot shorter than my five-ten. Probably in her early twenties. Long curly brown hair, regular
features, and green eyes—the type of young woman most often described as "cute," that catchall
description meaning she wasn't a beauty but there was nothing to drive her into the realm of ugliness. She
wore sunglasses, a brimmed hat, and a sundress that flattered the kind of figure men love and women
hate, the full curves so maligned in a world of Jenny Craig and Slim-Fast.