
was only twenty-eight years old then. Under his own name and under his pen name, Don A. Stuart, he was one of the
most famous and highly regarded authors of science fiction, but he was about to bury his writing reputation forever
under the far greater renown he was to gain as editor.
He was to remain editor of Astounding Science Fiction and of its successor, Analog Science Fact-Science
Fiction, for a third of a century. During all that time, he and I were to remain friends, but however old I grew and
however venerable and respected a star of our mutual field I was to become, I never approached him with anything but
that awe he inspired in me on the occasion of our first meeting.
He was a large man, an opinionated man, who smoked and talked constantly, and who enjoyed, above
anything else, the production of outrageous ideas, which he bounced off his listener and dared him to refute. It was
difficult to refute Campbell even when his ideas were absolutely and madly illogical.
We talked for over an hour that first time. He showed me forthcoming issues of the magazine (actual future
issues in the cellulose-flesh). I found he had printed a ‘fan letter of mine in the issue about to be published, and
another in the next-so he knew the genuineness of my interest.
He told me about himself, about his pen name and about his opinions. He told me that his father had sent in
one of his manuscripts to Amazing Stories when he was seventeen and that it would have been published but the
magazine lost it and he had no carbon. (I was ahead of him there. I had brought in the story myself and I had a carbon.)
He also promised to read my story that night and to send a letter, whether acceptance or rejection, the next day. He
promised also that in case of rejection he would tell me what was wrong with it so I could improve.
He lived up to every promise. Two days later, on June 23,
I heard from him. It was a rejection. (Since this book deals with real events and is not a fantasy-you can’t be
surprised that my first story was instantly rejected.)
Here is what I said in my diary about the rejection:
“At 9:30 I received back ‘Cosmic Corkscrew’ with a polite letter of rejection. He didn’t like the slow beginning,
the suicide at the end.”
Campbell also didn’t like the first-person narration and the stiff dialog, and further pointed out that the length
(nine thousand words) was inconvenient-too long for a short story, too short for a novelette. Magazines had to be put
together like jigsaw puzzles, you see, and certain lengths for individual stories were more convenient than others.
By that time, though, I was off and running. The joy of having spent an hour and more with John Campbell,
the thrill of talking face to face and on even terms with an idol, had already filled me with the ambition to write another
science fiction story, better than the first, so that I could try him again. The pleasant letter of rejection-two full
pages-in which he discussed my story seriously and with no trace of patronization or contempt, reinforced my joy.
Before June 23 was over, I was halfway through the first draft of another story.
Many years later I asked Campbell (with whom I had by then grown to be on the closest terms) why he had
bothered with me at all, since that first story was surely utterly impossible.
“It was,” he said frankly, for he never flattered. “On the other hand, I saw something in you. You were eager
and you listened and I knew you wouldn’t quit no matter how many rejections I handed you. As long as you were
willing to work hard at improving, I was willing to work with you.”
That was John. I wasn’t the only writer, whether newcomer or oldtimer, that he was to work with in this
fashion. Patiently, and out of his own enormous vitality and talent, he built up a stable of the best s.f. writers the world
had, till then, ever seen.
What happened to “Cosmic Corkscrew” after that I don’t really know. I abandoned it and never submitted it
anywhere else. I didn’t actually tear it up and throw it away; it simply languished in some desk drawer until eventually
I lost track of it. In any case, it no longer exists.
This seems to be one of the main sources of discomfort among the archivists-they seem to think the first
story I ever wrote for publication, however bad it might have been, was an important document. All I can say, fellows,
is that I’m sorry but there was no way of my telling in 1938 that my first try might have historic interest someday. I may
be a monster of vanity and arrogance, but I’m not that much a monster of vanity and arrogance.
Besides, before the month was out I had finished my second story, “Stowaway,” and I was concentrating on
that. I brought it to Campbell’s office on July 18, 1938, and he was just a trifle slower in returning it, but the rejection
came on July 22. I said in my diary concerning the letter that accompanied it:
“. . . it was the nicest possible rejection you could imagine. Indeed, the next best thing to an acceptance. He
told me the idea was good and the plot passable. The dialog and handling, he continued, were neither stiff nor wooden
(this was rather a delightful surprise to me) and that there was no one particular fault but merely a general air of
amateurishness, constraint, forcing. The story did not go smoothly. This, he said, I would grow out of as soon as I had
had sufficient experience. He assured me that I would probably be able to sell my stories but it meant perhaps a year’s
work and a dozen stories before I could click. . . .”
It is no wonder that such a “rejection letter” kept me hotly charged with enormous enthusiasm to write, and I
got promptly to work on a third story.
What’s more, I was sufficiently encouraged to try to submit “Stowaway” elsewhere. In those days there were
three science fiction magazines on the stands. Astounding was the aristocrat of the lot, a monthly with smooth edges
and an appearance of class. The other two. Amazing Stories and Thrilling Wonder Stories, were somewhat more
primitive in appearance and printed stories, with more action and less-sophisticated plots. I sent “Stowaway” to
Thrilling Wonder Stories, which, however, also rejected it promptly on August 9, 1938 (with a form letter).