9
And deep into biblical times we are led to confront our first parents: Enkil and
Akasha, rulers of the valley of the Nile before it was ever called Egypt. Kindly
disregard the gobbledygook of how they became the first bloodsuckers on the face of
the earth; it makes only a little more sense than the story of how life formed on this
planet in the first place, or how human fetuses develop from microscopic cells within
the wombs of their mortal mothers. The truth is we are descended from this venerable
pair, and like it or no, there is considerable reason to believe that the primal generator
of all our delicious and indispensable powers resides in one or the other of their
ancient bodies. What does this mean? To put it bluntly, if Akasha and Enkil should
ever walk hand in hand into a furnace, we should all burn with them. Crush them to
glittering dust, and we are annihilated.
Ah, but there's hope. The pair haven't moved in over fifty centuries! Yes, that's
correct. Except of course that Lestat claims to have wakened them both by playing a
violin at the foot of their shrine. But if we dismiss his extravagant tale that Akasha
took him in her arms and shared with him her primal blood, we are left with the more
likely state of affairs, corroborated by stories of old, that the two have not batted an
eyelash since before the fall of the Roman Empire. They've been kept all this time in a
nice private crypt by Marius, an ancient Roman vampire, who certainly knows what's
best for all of us. And it was he who told the Vampire Lestat never to reveal the
secret.
Not a very trustworthy confidant, the Vampire Lestat. And what are his motives for
the book, the album, the films, the concert? Quite impossible to know what goes on in
the mind of this fiend, except that what he wants to do he does, with reliable
consistency. After all, did he not make a vampire child? And a vampire of his own
mother, Gabrielle, who for years was his loving companion? He may set his sights
upon the papacy, this devil, out of sheer thirst for excitement!
So that's the gist: Louis, a wandering philosopher whom none of us can find, has
confided our deepest moral secrets to countless strangers. And Lestat has dared to
reveal our history to the world, as he parades his supernatural endowments before the
mortal public.
Now the Question: Why are these two still in existence? Why have we not destroyed
them already? Oh, the danger to us from the great mortal herd is by no means a
certainty. The villagers are not yet at the door, torches in hand, threatening to burn the
castle. But the monster is courting a change in mortal perspective. And though we are
too clever to corroborate for the human record his foolish fabrications, the outrage
exceeds all precedent. It cannot go unpunished.
Further observations: If the story the Vampire Lestat has told is true-and there are
many who swear it is, though on what account they cannot tell you-may not the two-
thousand-year-old Marius come forward to punish Lestat's disobedience? Or perhaps
the King and Queen, if they have ears to hear, will waken at the sound of their names
carried on radio waves around the planet. What might happen to us all if this should
occur? Shall we prosper under their new reign? Or will they set the time for universal
destruction? Whatever the case, might not the swift destruction of the Vampire Lestat
avert it?