
Implications of a matter-antimatter mass asymmetry in Penning-trap experiments
Ting Cheng,1, ∗Manfred Lindner,1, †and Manibrata Sen1, ‡
1Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, being a local, unitary and Lorentz-invariant quan-
tum field theory, remains symmetric under the combined action of Charge, Parity, and Time Re-
versal (CPT) symmetry. This automatically implies that fundamental properties of particles and
antiparticles should be equal in magnitude. These fundamental tenets of the CPT principle have
been put to stringent tests in recent Penning-trap experiments, where the matter-antimatter mass
asymmetry has been measured. In light of these recent advances, we compare the bounds arising
on CPT invariance from kaon systems with those from Penning-trap experiments. Using a simple
yet powerful argument of mass decomposition of hadrons, we show that bounds on quark-antiquark
mass differences from kaon oscillations are way beyond the reach of Penning-trap experiments. We
lay out a roadmap to discuss possible reformulations of our understanding of the SM in the case of
a discovery of CPT violation by these precision experiments.
Keywords: CPT violation, precision experiments
I. INTRODUCTION
The Standard Model (SM) of Particle Physics is a lo-
cal, Lorentz invariant, Hermitian quantum field theory
(QFT). As explored in a series of celebrated papers [1–3],
one of the fundamental tenets of such a local, Lorentz in-
variant theory is the conservation of CPT symmetry, that
is, invariance under the combined operations of charge
conjugation, parity inversion, and time reversal. The
conservation of CPT guarantees that physical proper-
ties of matter and antimatter are related, for example,
their masses should be identical, their charges, if any,
should be equal and opposite. In fact, the requirement
that a Hermitian QFT is causal automatically warrants
the existence of antimatter which should have the ex-
act same mass of the corresponding matter field. There-
fore, a test of whether there exists a mass asymmetry
between matter and antimatter, aptly dubbed here as
the matter-antimatter mass asymmetry (MAMA), auto-
matically translates to a test of the sacred principle of
CPT invariance, and in turn, the foundations of the SM.
Theoretically, a number of motivations exist for CPT
symmetry to be exact, relating the properties of matter
and antimatter. However, the baryon asymmetry of the
Universe implies a matter dominated Universe. This in-
dicates that some form of asymmetry between matter and
antimatter must have been introduced through a new yet-
unknown mechanism in the early Universe. While models
of successful baryogenesis usually follow a CPT symmet-
ric approach, focusing on the Sakharov conditions [4], a
baryon asymmetry could also arise in thermal equilib-
rium in the presence of CPT violation, and baryon num-
ber violation [5]. Additionally, extensions of the SM to in-
corporate a quantum theory of gravity often induces CPT
violation [6]. Phenomenological motivations include the
∗ting.cheng@mpi-hd.mpg.de
†manfred.lindner@mpi-hd.mpg.de
‡manibrata.sen@mpi-hd.mpg.de
search for violation of Lorentz invariance (LI), or viola-
tion of locality (L), leading to CPT violation [7–15].
Experimental tests of CPT invariance can be twofold:
testing the properties of particles and antiparticles di-
rectly, or probing the indirect impact of CPT violation
on other processes. In the absence of a specific model,
it is difficult to compare different experimental results at
the same footing. Therefore, in this letter, we aim to
bridge different mass measuring experiments in a model
independent manner, such that any new physics resulting
in CPT breaking can be investigated through a bottom-
up approach. By treating the constraints from each ex-
perimental result using dimensionless parameters, the
strongest constraint on CPT symmetry itself is currently
from the kaon oscillation experiments. The MAMA pa-
rameter is the difference between the two diagonal terms
of the Hamiltonian of (K0,¯
K0)in flavor space, and is
tested using the Bell-Steinberger relation constructed un-
der assumptions of unitarity [16,17]. Note that neu-
tral kaon-antikaon oscillations involve a process where
strangeness is violated by 2 units at one loop, through
a box-diagram (see [18], and references therein). In such
a scenario, the test of MAMA could be more sensitive
to violations of the principle of locality, the underlying
process being a loop process. On the other hand, neu-
trino oscillation experiments also provide another inter-
esting test of CPT conservation. Here, for a given neu-
trino energy, and baseline of the experiment, oscillation
parameters (mass-squared difference, mixing angles) are
fitted separately for the neutrino and antineutrino spec-
tra [7,8,19–30]. In this case, MAMA is measured with
respect to the dispersion relation of the propagating neu-
trino, and therefore, provides a more sensitive probe of
Lorentz-invariance violation [31]. For a discussion re-
garding tests of non-locality using neutrino oscillation
experiments, see [32] and references therein. In all these
cases, tests of CPT conservation usually quote the re-
sults in terms of the mass difference between the parti-
cles and the antiparticles. It is important to emphasize
that while the definition of the measured “mass” may be
arXiv:2210.10819v2 [hep-ph] 17 Jul 2023