
Force and moment characteristics of annular gaps
i. Experimental identification of all 48 coefficients
In the following, we focus only on the experimental identification of all 48 rotordynamic coefficients,
i.e. the dynamic characteristics including the tilt and moment coefficients. One of the first
experimental identification of the all coefficients of an annular seal was presented by Kanemori
and Iwatsubo
[13
,
14]
. Here a test rig was presented, consisting of two rotors embedded in each
other. By bearing and driving both rotors independently of each other, small translational and
angular motions inducing frequency-dependent forces and moments on the rotor are imposed
around the static equilibrium position By measuring both the motion of the rotor and the induced
forces and moments on the rotor, the rotordynamic coefficients are identified using parameter
identification methods, cf. [
13
,
38
]. Essentially, the influence of the axial pressure difference
∆˜
p
as well as the angular frequency of the rotor
˜
Ω
and the pre-swirl
˜
Cϕ|z=0
and the combination of
cylindrical and conical whirls is investigated.
In contrast to the two embedded rotors used by Kanemori and Iwatsubo, Neumer
[25]
and
Matros et al. [22] use active magnetic bearings (AMBs) to position and excite the rotor. Here, the
main advantage is that the bearings act as actuators and sensors at the same time. By measuring
the electric current of the electromagnets as well as the rotor position, the force of the bearing is
determined based on the force-current relation. This three-dimensional characteristic can either be
determined by an extensive calibration procedure or by calculation of the partial derivation of the
field energy stored in the volume of the air gap with respect to the air gap itself, cf. Maslen and
Schweitzer
[21]
. However, the force-current relation of the bearing is often linearised resulting in a
significantly high uncertainty of the measured forces. Furthermore, it is only valid at the main
coordinate axes of the magnetic bearing. Within their studies, Neumer and Matros et al. focus
mainly on the influence of the angular frequency of the rotor
˜
Ω
as well as the influence of the
axial pressure difference
∆˜
p
on the rotordynamic coefficients. Here, in addition to the stiffness,
damping and inertia coefficients from the induced forces due to translational motion, only stiffness
and damping coefficients from the induced moments on the rotor due to translational motion are
given.
The aforementioned references are the exclusive bases for all 48 rotordynamic coefficients.
Accordingly, there is a need for further reliable experimental investigations of the dynamic
properties, especially regarding the additional rotordynamic tilt and moment coefficients and their
dependencies according to equation 2. For this purpose, a test rig originally presented by Kuhr
et al.
[17]
is extended in the following sections for the experimental determination of the dynamic
force and moment characteristic using four linear independent whirling motions.
II. Annular gap flow test rig
[
16
,
17
] present a test rig to experimentally investigate the static force characteristics of generic
annuli, cf. figure 2. The test rig mainly consists of two active magnetic bearings supporting
the rotor and to act as an inherent displacement, excitation and force measurement system. In
contrast to the test rigs used by Neumer and Matros et al., the force is obtained by measuring
the magnetic flux density
˜
B
in the air gap between the rotor and the active magnetic bearing.
Therefore, each pole of each electromagnet is equipped with a hall sensor. The force applied per
pole is proportional to the magnetic flux density
˜
FH∝˜
B2
. The test rig is designed to investigate
annuli with relative lengths in a range of 0.2
≤L≤
1.8 and relative clearances 10
−3≤ψ≤
10
−2
.
Furthermore, it is capable of applying pressure differences across the annulus up to 13
bar
,
resulting in flow numbers up to
φ≤
5. For a detailed description of the test rig, its calibration
and the measurement uncertainty of the used equipment, refer to [
16
,
17
]. In contrast to the
4