APREPRINT - OCTOBER 11, 2022
viable pollen. (Stanley & Linskens, 1974). The Alexander stain discriminates aborted pollen grains from non-aborted
pollen grains by staining the cytoplasm in red, and the cell walls green. In the absence of cytoplasm (non-viable grains),
the green cell walls become visible, indicating lack of viability
(
Alexander, 1969). The last major advance in this area
was almost half a century back when the Heslop-Harrisons developed a viability test based on fluorochromatic reaction
based membrane integrity and enzyme activity
(
J. Heslop-Harrison & Heslop-Harrison, 1970; Y. Heslop-Harrison,
1977; Shivanna & Heslop-Harrison, 1981). Although staining methods offer the possibility to distinguish aborted and
non-aborted fresh pollen, they often fail to discriminate different viability levels (Ge et al., 2011).
Refined viability estimations have been attempted by comparing and combining some of these techniques. For example,
high correlations were found between viability results from IF cytometry and FDA staining in case of mature cucumber,
sweet pepper, and tomato pollen
(
Heidmann, Schade-Kampmann, Lambalk, Ottiger, & Di Berardino, 2016). However,
pollen viability assessment purely through microscopy has not been investigated up till now. Therefore, the present
study aims to assess whether DHM can be used as a standalone method for checking viability of pollen. The term
“pollen viability” has been used as an umbrella term describing the capacity of pollen to live, grow, germinate, or
develop
(
Dafni & Firmage, 2000). By manually comparing 500 individual pollen grains of Lantana camara, we selected
distinguishing features amongst over 30 parameters identified by the DHM technique. The results were compared
with the pollen viability assessed by the fastest method (acetocarmine staining) and it was found that DHM can very
successfully discern one from the other.
2.2 Invasive species pollen analysis; Case Study Lantana camara
Our interest in pollen analysis is an extension of our ongoing efforts to understand Invasive alien plants species (IAPS),
particularly Lantana camara
(
P. Mishra, Prasad, Babu, & Yadav, 2021; Chauhan, Yadav, & Babu, 2022; Davis &
Thompson, 2000). IAPS are considered to be one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss, posing severe threats to
ecosystem services, environmental quality and human health globally
(
B. A. Jones & McDermott, 2018; Bartz &
Kowarik, 2019; Pejchar & Mooney, 2009). Lantana camara (Wild Sage) is a small broadleaf flowering shrub within the
Verbenaceae family, native to American tropics
(
Sharma, Makkar, & Dawra, 1988). It is an extremely adaptable weed,
found across a wide variety of ecosystems. Once Lantana has been introduced into a habitat, it spreads rapidly, and has
already done so from it’s native Central and South America to over 50 countries, making it one of the world’s top ten
invasives (Ghisalberti, 2000).
Pollen viability data becomes important in context of both, species invasivity as well as habitat invasibility, because
it can provide important information on successful establishment of a given species in a habitat, thereby serving as
a measure of invasiveness
(
Jiang, Ma, Lin, & Ma, 2022). For this reason, production of seedless or sterile invasive
plants would be beneficial both to the nursery/horticultural industry as well as the environment
(
Beck-Pay, 2012). One
way of identifying sterile plants is to estimate viability across populations but as mentioned in earlier sections, this
is often time consuming on account of technique limitation. A study on 32 L. camara cultivars and breeding lines
revealed that stainability, the main parameter used to determine viability, is influenced by ploidy levels, indicating a
strong potential to develop genetically sterile cultivars
(
Czarnecki, Hershberger, Robacker, Clark, & Deng, 2014). Other
studies have also established that assessment of morphological and cytological differences among lantana varieties
can help in measuring invasive potential and suitability for commercial production and landscape use
(
Steppe, Wilson,
Deng, Druffel, & Knox, 2019). To date, the only method faster than vital staining appears to be in pollen imaging, but
this has not been addressed nor explored fully as described in the next section.
2.3 Imaging of pollen grains
Traditionally, palynologists have used compound light microscopy (LM) for pollen identification and interpretation
and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphological comparisons and taxonomy
(
G. D. Jones & Bryant Jr,
2007). Doubtlessly, SEM offers far greater resolution, and has led to creation of new terminology for describing pollen
ornamentation, numerical approaches to pollen sculpturing and exine architectures
(
Skvarla, Rowley, & Vezey, 1989).
However, sample preparation and the time needed to count, analyze, photograph and print the micrographs, and the
consequent lack of scalability are the limiting factors in these approaches.
With the advancement of digital microscopy, palynology studies are becoming even less time-consuming and can
generate more reliable data for species taxonomy, apart from saving hours spent on manual counts of pollen grains
following the process of staining to differentiate between viable and inviable pollen
(
S. Mishra, Srivastava, et al., 2015)).
At the turn of the millenium, alternative digital methods for counting pollen were devised, but often without regard to
viable and invisible grains, and these protocols also had drawbacks of software specific to branded instruments.
(
Bechar
et al., 1997; Aronne, Cavuoto, & Eduardo, 2001).
3