Proportional counters and microchannel plates 3
a very low energy threshold, but it is also an excellent option for photon detec-
tion when an appropriate photocathode for the wavelength range of interest is used.
Since the 1980s, MCPs were for many years the main technology for astronomi-
cal instruments over the complete ultraviolet (UV) spectral range and they are still
competitive in this waveband to silicon-based detectors like CCDs or CMOS. In
fact, the best technology for a certain application depends strongly on the individual
instrumental requirements and the parameters of the satellite platform. Not only in
the UV, but also in the visible and the X-ray bands MCP detectors were success-
fully applied. However, new instruments and missions with MCP detectors are only
proposed in the far (FUV) and extreme UV (EUV, sometimes also XUV).
Considering X-ray astronomy, the key feature of MCP detectors is the unprece-
dented position resolution. Therefore, it is no wonder that with HRI (High Reso-
lution Imager) (Kellogg et al., 1976) flown on the Einstein (HEAO-2) observatory
(Giacconi et al., 1979) the first modern imaging X-ray telescope employed an MCP
detector. The same instrument design was reused after significant further develop-
ments for the HRI on ROSAT (ROentgen SATellite) (Pfeffermann et al., 1987) and
the HRC (High Resolution Camera) of the Chandra X-ray observatory (Weisskopf
et al., 2002) that is still operable today 23 years after its launch. Furthermore, an
MCP detector was also used in the WFC (Wide Field Camera) of ROSAT (Barstow
et al., 1985).
Both detector types discussed here work in counting mode, meaning that they
both register individual photon events. While the proportional counter has an intrin-
sic (medium) energy resolution, MCP-based detectors usually only resolve energy
when used with a dispersive element like a grating and then exploiting their superior
position resolution. A second distinguishing feature is the need for a window for the
proportional counter to separate the gas volume while an MCP detector can be op-
erated open face. However, the gain in quantum detection efficiency by not having
transmission losses in a window for MCP detectors is always over-compensated by
the lower intrinsic quantum efficiency compared to a proportional counter.
Meanwhile, proportional counters as well as MCP detectors were almost com-
pletely replaced by their principal competitors in X-ray astronomy, namely silicon-
based detectors (Knoll, 2010). However, there are a few niches for which these
technologies are still developed: while MCP detectors are further optimized for the
UV and EUV where they can still be competitive to silicon technology depending
on the application and the requirements, position sensitive proportional counters are
applied recently to measure polarization in X-rays – a longstanding and scientifi-
cally highly interesting topic that is now tackled by several missions.
This chapter presents in Section 2 the general concept of proportional counters,
their basic parameters, and some considerations on applying them in X-ray space
missions. In Section 3 the principle of imaging proportional counters and their ap-
plication in X-ray astronomy are discussed, including the relevance of micropattern
gas detectors for X-ray polarimetry. Section 4 explains the functionality of MCP
detectors and highlights applications in X-ray as well as UV and EUV astronomy.
Section 5 concludes with an outlook on the future prospects of both discussed de-
tector technologies.