
many other diseases, while a small amount of oxidized
nucleotides produced due to normal ROS levels is neces-
sary for memory and learning [16–18].
In 2016, while studying the effect of cytosine modifi-
cations on DNA flexibility, Ngo et al. [19] found that the
methylation of cytosine (5-methylcytosine) causes reduc-
tion of DNA flexibility. During base analog substitution
(substituting either inosine for guanosine or 2,6-di-
aminopurine for adenine), Peters et al. [20] found minor
changes in global properties like persistence length, helical
repeat and torsional stiffness. The data obtained from cir-
cular dichroism spectroscopy in the same work of Peters
et al. showed some significant changes in helical geometry
of the modified DNA compared to normal DNA. In another
work, Peters et al. [21] experimentally measured the
bending and twisting flexibilities of DNA analog polymers
with one of the four regular bases of DNA substituted by
different cationic, anionic, or neutral analogs under low salt
buffers. They found only about 20%change in bending
rigidity but a large increase (about 5-fold) of twist flexi-
bility on such modified DNA analogs in comparison to the
unmodified one. They suggested that such modifications of
regular bases make dsDNA to have transition to different
helical conformations other than canonical B-form and
effect is minimal as far as the mechanical properties are
concerned. It is reported that the methylation of the cyto-
sine base of DNA influence the DNA’s backbone structure
due to the steric hindrance between the methyl group and
ribose sugar that prevents the formation of hydrogen bonds
between the nucleobase and backbone and results in the
local increment of DNA flexibility [22].
In another computational study by Miller et al. [23],
G19:C6 base pair of DNA oligonucleotide GGGAA-
CAACTAG:CTAGTTGTTCCC was replaced by 8oxoG.
They found that when 8oxoG replaced G19, the local
bending into the major groove is more probable than
changing the DNA’s global bending, which assists in the
formation of local kinks at the 8oxoG associated major
grooves. The oxidative damage of DNA can bring local
alterations on phosphate backbone and changes of sugar
puckers of the oxidized bases [24,25]. Cheng et al. [26]
conducted unrestrained molecular dynamics simulations
for several 13-mer DNA duplexes. In their results, the
B-form duplexes of oligomers with G:C and 8oxoG:C base
pairs are found to adopt proper Watson-Crick geometry
and the local and global flexibilities of the duplexes are
increased. In the case of G:A mismatch, the Watson-Crick
geometry is found to be decreased with higher structural
fluctuations. These simulations demonstrated that both
dynamic and equilibrium properties of DNA duplexes
change during their oxidative damage. All these works
inspired us to decipher how different amount of oxidation
in DNA can influence their microscopic structural and
mechanical properties.
In this work, we carried out all-atom MD simulations of
different oxidized double-stranded DNAs (dsDNAs) and
computed various mechanical properties such as stretch
modulus (cG), persistence length (lp), twist-stretch-cou-
pling (s) and torsional stiffness (C). As several earlier
works have shown more alterations of local parameters
than global ones, we have tried to explain the changes of
various microscopic structural parameters with the oxi-
dization of the DNA bases. We believe, it will help to
advance the understanding about the alterations of bio-
logical as well as physical properties brought due to
oxidative damage of DNA, specifically based on the
changes of mechanical properties and microscopic heli-
coidal parameters.
This article is organized as follows. We begin with the
methods describing the model building of oxidized DNA
and details of all-atom MD simulations. Then, we give
details of the theoretical models used to calculate the
elastic properties of nucleic acids. In the results and dis-
cussion section, we present the mechanical properties, such
as stretch modulus (cG), persistence length (lp), twist-
stretch-coupling (s), etc., of the dsDNAs. We also analyze
the various microscopic structural parameters. Finally, we
summarize all the results and provide a perspective and
utility of various results.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Simulation setup
2.1.1. System build-up
The Dickerson-Drew dodecamer (d[CGCGAATTCGCG])
double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) was prepared using the
nucleic acid builder(NAB) [27] tool of Amber18 [28].
Using an in-house developed python script, the guanine
bases are oxidized as shown in Fig. 1(b). We prepared three
dsDNA molecules: one is native dsDNA, where no bases
are oxidized, another one is dsDNA(4oxG), whose four
guanine bases (two of each strand but in two opposite
halves) are oxidized and the third one is dsDNA(8oxG),
whose eight guanine bases (four of each strand or all
guanine bases) are oxidized.
The interactions of pure dsDNA are represented by
Amber ff10 force field [29] while the interactions of oxi-
dized bases are taken from the work of Miller et al. [23].
The TIP3P water model [30,31] was used to solvate the
dsDNAs, resulting in a 15 A
˚TIP3P water buffer sur-
rounding the structure in each direction. Because the
2598 K B Chhetri et al.