
The point σ∈D:= {z∈C:|z| ≤ 1}is unique and called the Denjoy–Wolff point of the semigroup
generated by f(z). By Denjoy-Wolff theorem [13, 37, 36] for continuous semigroup, limt→∞ u(t, z) = σif
the semigroup generated by fis neither an elliptic automorphism of Dnor an identity map for at least one
t∈[0,∞). We denote the class of infinitesimal generators with Denjoy-Wolff point σby G[σ].For σ= 0, we
obtain the following subclass
G[0] = {f∈ G :f(z) = zp(z),Re p(z)≥0}.
Bracci et al. [7] considered the class G0=G[0]∩A. In the study of non-autonomous problem such as Loewner
theory, the class G0plays a significant role [8, 12]. Various subclasses of G0are considered with parameter,
which is also called filtration. For instance, the class
Aβ=f∈ A : Re βf(z)
z+ (1 −β)f0(z)>0, β ∈[0,1](1.2)
is a subclass of G0.In [7], the authors proved that Aβ1(Aβ2(G0for 0 ≤β1< β2<1 and whenever
f∈ Aβ,
Re f(z)
z≥Z1
0
1−t1−β
1 + t1−βdt.
Clearly, when β= 0, the class Aβreduces to the class R:= {f∈ A : Re f0(z)>0},which is called the
class of bounded turning functions. It can be easily seen that R⊂G0and each f∈ R satisfies the Noshiro-
Warshawski condition [12], thus every member of Rgenerates a semigroup that is univalent. Elin et al. [14]
solved the radii problems for the class Aβ. They found the radii r∈(0,1) for f∈ Aβsuch that f(rz)/r
belong to the class of starlike functions, denoted by S∗, and some other subclasses of starlike functions. This
problem arises from the fact that neither S∗⊂ Aβnor Aβ⊂ S∗. Generalizing this work, Giri and Kumar
[16] obtained rsuch that f(rz)/r belong to the class of Ma-Minda starlike functions.
Coefficient problems, growth estimates and others were still open for the class Aβ. In this paper, we focus
on these problems. We find the bound of nth coefficient of f∈ Aβand coefficient functional such as second
Hankel determinant, third order Toeplitz and Hermitian Toeplitz determinant and Zalcman functional.
Later, Bohr and Bohr-Rogosinski phenomenon with growth estimates are also discussed for this class.
In 1914, Bohr [5] proved that, if ω(z) = P∞
n=0 cnzn∈ B, then P∞
n=0|cn|rn≤1 for all z∈Dwith
|z|=r≤1/3.The constant 1/3 is known as Bohr radius. This inequality was first derived by Bohr for
r≤1/6 and sharpened independently to r≤1/3 by Wiener, Riesz, and Schur. In recent years, a lot of
study have been carried out on the Bohr inequality for functions, which map Donto other domains, say Ω
[4, 15]. Different generalizations of the Bohr inequality are taken into consideration [39, 27]. We say that
Definition 1.2. The class Aβsatisfies the Bohr phenomenon if there exists rbsuch that
|z|+∞
X
n=2|an||z|n≤d(f(0), ∂f(Ω))
holds in |z|=r≤rb,where ∂f(Ω) is the boundary of image domain of Dunder fand ddenotes the
Euclidean distance between f(0) and ∂f(Ω).
For m= 1, Muhanna [32] showed that the Bohr phenomenon holds for the class of univalent functions
and the class of convex functions, when |z|=r≤3−2√2 and |z|=r≤1/3 respectively. We refer to the
survey article [31] for further details on this topic. There is also the concept of Rogosinski radius along with
the Bohr radius, although a little is known about Rogosinski radius in comparison to Bohr radius [17, 22, 35].
It says that, if ω(z) = P∞
n=0 cnzn∈ B, then
N−1
X
n=0 |cn||z|n≤1 (N∈N)
in the disk |z|=r≤1/2.The radius 1/2 is called the Rogosinski radius. Kayumov et al. [18] considered
the following expression
Rf
N(z) := |f(z)|+∞
X
n=N|an||z|n
2