The MNS equations were first introduced by Eringen [2] to describe the evolution of an incompressible
fluid whose material particles possess both translational and rotational motions. The novelties of this system
are to reflect the effects of microstructure on the fluid via a microscopic dissipative evolution equations for the
angular momentum. Thus, this model is often used to describe the motion of blood, certain lubricants, liquid
crystals, ferrofluids, and some polymeric fluids [1,3,4]. Given the significant role it played in the microfluids,
numerical solving of the MNS system has drawn a considerable amount of attention. A penalty projection
method is proposed and optimal error estimates are proved in [5]. In [6], Nochetto et al. proposed and
analyzed first-order and second-order semi-implicit fully-discrete schemes. These schemes decouple linear
velocity computation from angular velocity computation, while being energy-stable. Later, Salgado further
adopted the fractional time stepping technique to decouple the computation of pressure and velocity and
proved the rigorous error estimates in [7]. In these works, the nonlinear terms are treated either implicitly
or semi-implicitly so that one needs to solve a nonlinear system or a linear system with variable coefficients
at each time step. It is desirable to treat the nonlinear term explicitly while maintaining energy stability.
With such treatment, the schemes only require the solution of linear system with constant coefficients upon
discretization, which are very efficient.
In recent years, SAV based schemes have attracted much attention due to their efficiency, flexibility
and accuracy. The main idea is to introduce auxiliary variables to preserve the property of energy decay.
Several classes of energy stable numerical schemes have been developed for many dissipative systems, like
gradient flows [8,9,10,11], NS equations [12,13,14], magnetohydrodynamic equations [15,16,17] and
Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes equations [18,19,20]. In particular, Shen et al. [21] proposed a new class of
efficient IMEX BDFk(1 ≤k≤5) schemes combined with a SAV approach for general dissipative systems.
The distinct advantages are that their higher-order versions are also unconditionally energy stable and only
require solving one decoupled linear system with constant coefficients at each time step.
For the MNS equations considered in this article, the energy structure is an inequality rather than an
equality like many dissipative systems. This fact makes the energy-equality based approaches [8,21] fail.
Thus, it is not trivial to construct efficient SAV schemes for such systems. The aim of this work is to extend
the approach proposed in [13] to the MNS equations. Our main contributions are three-folds:
1. We propose a decoupled, linear and first-order scheme for the MNS equations by combining the SAV
approach for the convective terms and some subtle IMEX treatments for the coupling terms. The
scheme only requires solving a sequence of differential equations with constant coefficients at each
time step so it is very efficient and easy to implement.
2. We establish rigorous unconditional energy stability and error analysis for the proposed scheme in two
dimensions.
3. We provide some numerical experiments to confirm the predictions of the theory and demonstrate the
efficiency of the scheme.
Compared to the Navier-Stokes equations, the error analysis for the MNS equations is much more involved
due to the coupling terms. It is remarked that the present idea can be applies to the Boussinesq equations
and ferrohydrodynamics equations.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some notations and present the
energy estimate fo the MNS equations. In Section 3, we propose the Euler IMEX-SAV scheme and prove
the unconditional stability. In Section 4, we carry out a rigorous error analysis for the proposed scheme in
two dimensions. In Section 5, we present some numerical experiments. In Section 6, we conclude with a few
remarks.
2. Preliminaries
We start by introducing some notations and spaces. As usual, the inner product and norm in L2(Ω) are
denoted by (·,·) and k·k, respectively. Let Wm,p(Ω) stand for the standard Sobolev spaces equipped with
the standard Sobolev norms k·km,p. For p= 2, we write Hm(Ω) for Wm,2(Ω) and its corresponding norm
is k·km. For a given Sobolev space X, we write Lq(0, T ;X) for the Bochner space. Throughout the paper,
2