2 FENG, TANG, XU, AND ZHOU
models were also investigated recently. In particular, we mention the studies based
on the two-phase models [50,61,64], and the works involve chemotaxis [34,38].
Most studies on the stability/instability of tumor boundary are based on the above
class of models and have been investigated from different points of view. Among
them, for different models (e.g., Darcy [17,21,22,25,27]; and Stokes [20,23,24]),
Friedman et al. proved the existence of non-radially symmetric steady states
analytically and classified the stability/instability of the boundaries from the Hopf
bifurcation point of view. Specifically, in their studies, the bifurcation parameter is
characterized by the cell proliferation rate or ratio to cell-cell adhesiveness. Then the
authors showed that the boundary stability/instability changes when the parameter
crosses a specific bifurcation point. On the other hand, Cristini et al. in [12], as
the pioneers, employ asymptotic analysis to study and predict the tumor evolution.
Their work is of great significance to the dynamic simulation of tumors and nurtured
more related works in this direction [49,51,52,61,64]. All the research demonstrated
that many factors could induce the tumor’s boundary instability, including but
not limited to vascularization [12,49,50,61], proliferation [12,20,24,25,27,49],
apoptosis [12,20,24,25,27,49,49,61,64], cell-cell adhesion [12,20,24,25,27,61],
bending rigidity [50,64], microenvironment [51,52,61,64], chemotaxis [49,51].
In recent decades, tumor modeling from different perspectives has emerged and
developed. In particular, one could consider the density model proposed by Byrne
and Drasdo in [6], in which the tumor cell density
ρ
is governed by a porous medium
type equation, and the internal pressure
p
is induced by the power rule
p
=
ρm
with the parameter
m >
1. The power rule enables
p
naturally vanish on the
tumor boundary. Moreover, the boundary velocity
v
is governed by Darcy’s law
v
=
−∇p|∂Ω
. Previous research indicates that the porous media type equations
have an asymptote concerning the parameter m tending to infinity [3,30,35,41,42].
Motivated by this, Perthame et al. derived the second kind of free boundary model
in [57] by taking the incompressible limit (sending
m
to infinity), or equivalently
mesa-limit of the density models. An asymptotic preserving numerical scheme
was designed by J.Liu et al. in [45], the scheme naturally connects the numerical
solutions to the density models to that of the free boundary models.
In the mesa-limit free boundary models proposed in [57], the limit density
ρ∞
can
only take value in [0
,
1], and the corresponding limit pressure
p∞
is characterized
by a monotone Hele-Shaw graph. More specifically,
p∞
vanishes on the unsaturated
region where
ρ∞<
1(see equation
(2.7)
). The Hele-Shaw graph representation of
pressure brings the following advantages. Firstly, in the Hele-Shaw type model, the
formation of a necrotic core can be described by an obstacle problem [33], which
leads
ρ∞
to decay exponentially in the necrotic core. Due to the Hele-Shaw graph,
the pressure
p∞
naturally vanishes there instead of taking negative values. Secondly,
a transparent regime called "patch solutions" exists, in which
ρ∞
remains in the
form of
χD(t)
, i.e., the indicator function of the tumor region. Again, to satisfy
the corresponding Hele-Shaw graph,
p∞
has to vanish on the tumor’s interface
(where
ρ∞
drops from 1to 0), which is significantly different from the first kind
of free boundary models developed from [32], in which the internal pressure relies
on the boundary curvature
κ
as mentioned previously. Moreover, in the mesa-
limit free boundary models, the boundary velocity is still induced by Darcy’s law
v∞
=
−∇p∞|∂Ω
. For completeness, the derivation of the mesa-limit model is
summarized in Section 2.1. Albeit various successful explorations based on such