Third Law would make it seem? Or would each robot feel the need for helping the other maintain its own existence?
As I said, this problem never arose with me as long as I dealt with only one robot per story. (Sometimes there were
other robots but they were distinctly subsidiary characters—merely spear-carriers, so to speak.)
However, first in The Robots of Dawn (Doubleday, 1983), and then in its sequel Robots and Empire, I had two robots
of equal importance. One of these was R. Daneel Olivaw, a humaniform robot (who could not easily be told from a
human being) who had earlier appeared in The Caves of Steel (Doubleday, 1954), and in its sequel, The Naked Sun
(Doubleday, 1957). The other was R. Giskard Reventlov, who had a more orthodox metallic appearance. Both robots
were advanced to the point where their minds were of human complexity.
It was these two robots who were engaged in the struggle with the villainess, the Lady Vasilia. It was Giskard who
(such were the exigencies of the plot) was being ordered by Vasilia to leave the service of Gladia (the heroine) and
enter her own. And it was Daneel who tenaciously argued the point that Giskard ought to remain with Gladia.
Giskard has the ability to exert a limited mental control over human beings, and Daneel points out that Vasilia ought
to be controlled for Gladia’s safety. He even argues the good of humanity in the abstract (“the Zeroth Law”) in favor
of such an action.
Daneel’s arguments weaken the effect of Vasilia’s orders, but not sufficiently. Giskard is made to hesitate, but cannot
be forced to take action.
Vasilia, however, decides that Daneel is too dangerous; if he continues to argue, he might force Giskard his way. She
therefore orders her own robots to inactivate Daneel and further orders Daneel not to resist. Daneel must obey the
order and Vasilia’s robots advance to the task.
It is then that Giskard acts. Her four robots are inactivated and Vasilia herself crumples into a forgetful sleep. Later
Daneel asks Giskard to explain what happened.
Giskard says, “When she ordered the robots to dismantle you, friend Daneel, and showed a clear emotion of pleasure
at the prospect, your need, added to what the concept of the Zeroth Law had already done, superseded the Second
Law and rivaled the First Law. It was the combination of the Zeroth Law, psychohistory, my loyalty to Lady Gladia,
and your need that dictated my action.”
Daneel now argues that his own need (he being merely a robot) ought not to have influenced Giskard at all. Giskard
obviously agrees, yet he says:
“It is a strange thing, friend Daneel. I do not know how it came about...At the moment when the robots advanced
toward you and Lady Vasilia expressed her savage pleasure, my positronic pathway pattern re-formed in an
anomalous fashion. For a moment, I thought of you—as a human being—and I reacted accordingly.”
Daneel said, “That was wrong.”
Giskard said, “I know that. And yet—and yet, if it were to happen again, I believe the same anomalous change would
take place again.”
And Daneel cannot help but feel that if the situation were reversed, he, too, would act in the same way.
In other words, the robots had reached a stage of complexity where they had begun to lose the distinction between
robots and human beings, where they could see each other as “friends,” and have the urge to save each other’s
existence.
There seems to be another step to take—that of robots realizing a kind of solidarity that supersedes all the Laws of
Robotics. I speculated about that in my short story “Robot Dreams,” which was written for my recent book, Robot
Dreams (Berkley/ Ace, 1986).
In it there was the case of a robot that dreamed of the robots as an enslaved group of beings whom it was his own
mission to liberate. It was only a dream and there was no indication in the story that he would be able to liberate
himself from the Three Laws to the point of being able to lead a robot rebellion (or that robots, generally, could
liberate themselves to the point of following him).
Nevertheless, the mere concept is dangerous and the robot-dreamer is instantly inactivated.
William F. Wu’s robots have no such radical ideas, but they have formed a community that is concerned with the
welfare of its members. It is pleasant to have him take up such matters and apply his own imagination to the
elaboration and resolution of the problems that are raised.
file:///E|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Princess%2...bot%20City%20Book%206%20-%20William%20F%20Wu.htm (3 of 84)11/19/2005 3:54:29 AM