PACS numbers Eects of viscosity on liquid structures produced by in-air microuidics David BaumgartnerG unter Brenn and Carole Planchette

2025-05-06 0 0 4.73MB 16 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
PACS numbers:
Effects of viscosity on liquid structures produced by in-air microfluidics
David Baumgartner,G¨unter Brenn, and Carole Planchette
Institute of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria
(Dated: October 11, 2022)
This study experimentally investigates the effect of viscosity on the outcomes of collisions between
a regular stream of droplets and a continuous liquid jet. A broad variation of liquid viscosity of
both the drop and the jet liquid is considered, keeping other material properties unchanged. To
do so, only two liquid types were used: aqueous glycerol solutions for the drop and different types
of silicone oil for the jet liquid. Combining these liquids, the viscosity ratio λ=µdropjet was
varied between 0.25 and 3.50. The collision outcomes were classified in the form of regime maps
leading to four main regimes: drops-in-jet,fragmented drops-in-jet,encapsulated drops, and mixed
fragmentation. We demonstrate that, depending on the drop and jet viscosity, not all four regimes
can be observed in the domain probed by our experiments. The experiments reveal that the jet
viscosity mainly affects the transition between drops-in-jet and encapsulated drops, which is shifted
towards higher drop spacing for more viscous jets. The drop viscosity leaves the previous transition
unchanged, but modifies the threshold of the drop fragmentation within the continuous jet. We
develop a model that quantifies how the drop viscosity affects its extension, which is at first order
fixing its shape during recoil and is therefore determining its stability against pinch-off.
I. INTRODUCTION
The large number of recent scientific publications dedicated to encapsulation shows the increasing need for reliable,
precise and scalable technologies. This demand is mainly motivated by the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries,
which strive to deliver actives as efficiently and safely as possible [1–4]. The development of cell culture and tissue
engineering requires, beyond the necessity of cell feeding and harvesting, a mean, to manipulate and assemble the cells,
which can be achieved by their regular and controlled encapsulation into a matrix [5–8]. The need of encapsulation
is also rising in less demanding applications such as in the production of cosmetic, food-products, agricultural inputs,
and in depollution tasks [9–14].
To tackle these challenges, several methods have been proposed. For the production of well controlled spherical
capsules, the technology of choice is microfluidics. Indeed, since researchers have been using this toolbox, many micro-
droplet based applications emerged, including chemical micro-reactors, multiple emulsions and cell capsules [15–18].
Yet, while present in the scientific community since decades, microfluidics has barely made it to industries. Beside the
need for precise chips requiring appropriate design and manufacture, the risk of clogging remains, the main issue which
considerably limits scale-up possibilities [19–21]. Regarding the production of fibers, which are especially desirable
for medical and biomedical applications [22–24], the state of the art relies on coaxial or emulsion electrospinning. The
former, however, enables only the production of core-shell structures, and the latter does not offer the control on the
size and position of the inclusions [25–27].
The previously mentioned drawbacks of these existing technologies call for innovative approaches. Inspired by the
important knowledge about drop impacts, which include drop impacting onto a wall [28–33], a thin liquid film [34–36],
a liquid bath [37, 38] or another drop [39–43], the so called in-air-microfluidics, has recently been proposed [44, 45].
This promising approach consists in solidifying the liquid microstructures resulting from the collision in air of drop
streams and jets [46]. Binary drop collisions involving two or three drops of one or more liquids [40, 47, 48], and the
collision of a stream of drops with a continuous jet, count to this rather new encapsulation method. The structures
produced by the drop-jet collisions enable to form both spherical capsules and regular fibers containing periodic
encapsulation of monodisperse spheres. The collisions taking place in air, it suppresses the need for the additional
carrying liquid phase which must be used in microfluidics. Most importantly, the absence of channels eliminates the
critical risks of clogging. Finally, the alignment requirements are much more moderate than for drop-drop collisions.
Beside these obvious advantages, in-air-microfluidics remains to date largely unexplored, and its potential and limits
must still be described and understood. Indeed, not much happened since the pioneering work of Chen et al., who
used water for both the drops and the jet [49]. In that study, several behaviours were identified, which were named
with increasing inertia as bouncing, coalescence, segmenting, separation and splashing. The next study was performed
david.baumgartner@tugraz.at
arXiv:2210.04501v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 10 Oct 2022
2
by Planchette et al., who used immiscible liquids [44]. The outcomes were classified according to the fragmentation
of the drops or the jet, both or none providing fragmented drops in jet, capsules, mixed fragmentation and drops in
jet. The fragmentation of the jet was attributed to a capillary instability, while the one of the drop was associated
to an excess of its kinetic energy, which leads to its excessive deformation and thus its fragmentation. The proof of
concept regarding the solidification of the produced structures was provided about the same time by Visser et al.
[46]. More recently, the effects of liquid wettability and miscibility have been investigated [50]. It was shown that
replacing total wetting by partial one, or exchanging immiscible liquids against miscible ones, do not significantly
modify the outcomes, as long as the surface tension of the jet remains lower than the one of the drops. Questions
about the role of the liquid viscosities have not been addressed yet. Our experimental study aims to fill this gap and
bring the knowledge of in-air microfluidics one step forward. To do so, we investigate six different liquid combinations
consisting of two liquid types, namely three aqueous glycerol solutions for the drops and four silicone oils for the jet
liquid. These liquids provide total wetting of the jet on the drop, promoting their encapsulation, and differ only by
their viscosity. First, a wide range of collision parameters are screened for each combination, and the corresponding
outcomes are classified in four regimes, following the analysis by Planchette et al. [44]. Regime maps are built to
evidence the effects of viscosity on these regimes and their occurrence. The results are further interpreted by focusing
on the capillary fragmentation of the jet and on the inertial fragmentation of the drop. For the latter, the description
of the drop extension and recoil is enabled by the use of two cameras and aliasing stroboscopic illumination.
The paper is organized as follows. The experimental set-up and problem description are first introduced. The
experimental results are then presented, and the shifts in regime boundaries are discussed. The paper ends with the
conclusions.
II. MATERIAL AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
A. Experimental set-up and problem description
The present study focuses on head-on collisions of a regular stream of monodisperse droplets and a continuous
immiscible liquid jet. These collisions are realized by adjusting the trajectory of the droplets and the jet into the same
plane to avoid off-plane eccentricity. A sketch of the set-up used to generate this kind of collisions is shown in figure
1(a). Two pressurized and independent tanks supply the liquids for the drops and the jet, which are produced with a
droplet generator [51] and a nozzle, respectively. Micro traverses enable the accurate adjustment of their trajectories.
The drops and jet diameters range between Dd= 205 ±25 µm and Dj= 290 ±20 µm, respectively. Here, as well as
in the rest of this manuscript, the subscript drefers to the drop parameters and the drop liquid properties, while jis
used for the jet and the jet liquid properties. The drop generator and the illumination system (stroboscopic LED) are
connected to a signal generator in order to supply both devices with the same frequency (8000 Hz < fd<26000 Hz).
This allows the recording of frozen collision pictures. The imaging of one collision is then performed with two cameras
providing orthogonal (Camera 1) and front (Camera 2) views for all experiments. The drops are dyed and the
jet remains transparent, providing a strong contrast to easily distinguish them. All needed collision parameters are
extracted from collision pictures using the public-domain software ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) shown in figure
1(b). These parameters include the drop diameter Ddand the jet diameter Dj, the spatial period of the drops Ld
(300 1100 µm) and of the jet Lj(300 800 µm), the collision angle α(1560), and the velocities of the drop
~ud(4 15 ms1) and the jet ~uj(3 15 ms1). The magnification is larger than in our previous study [50] with not
more than 6 µm per pixel providing uncertainty below 3% for all measured diameters and velocities. Further detailed
information about the methods applied to obtain these parameters is shown elsewhere [50]. The relative velocity ~
U
(2 10 ms1) between drop and jet is defined as the impact velocity and is calculated as ~
U=~ud~uj. Note that in
this study the component of the relative velocity parallel to the jet trajectory, Uk=udcos(α)uj, is set to zero with
even stricter conditions than in [50] (Uk<0.04Uand even Uk<0.01Uclose to the transitions instead of Uk<0.1U).
As a consequence, the relative velocity ~
Ucorresponds to the component perpendicular to the jet trajectory whose
norm U=udsin(α) is independent from Lj/Dj=uj/(fdDj). This adjustment can be realized by varying ~ud,~uj
and αto obtain udcos(α) = uj, which is the condition ensuring head-on collisions.
For this work focusing on the viscosity role, we further introduce the viscosity ratio λ=µdj. It relates the
dynamic viscosity of the drop liquid µdto the dynamic viscosity of the jet liquid µjand lies between 0.25 and 3.50.
3
FIG. 1. (a) Experimental set-up for the drop/jet collision experiments. (b) Geometric and kinetic parameters of the collisions.
Figure adapted from [50].
B. Liquids
We use three aqueous glycerol solutions as the drop liquids and four silicone oils as the jet liquids. These two liquids
are immiscible and provide total wetting of the jet on the drop. The interfacial tension between the drop liquids and
the jet liquids can be specified as σdj = 32 ±3mNm1[52–54]. The values for the surface tension σ, the density ρ,
the dynamic viscosity µand the range of Ohnesorge number Oh =µ/ρσD of all liquids used are shown in table
I. Oh is calculated using either the drop or the jet diameter and the corresponding liquid properties. The density is
measured by weighing an exact volume of 100 ml, the viscosity is determined with a glass capillary viscometer, and
the surface tension is measured with the pendant drop method. To obtain aqueous solutions of different viscosities for
the drops, the mass fractions of glycerol (98%, Carl Roth GmbH, Germany) in water are 12%, 50% and 68% in case
of G1, G5 and G20, respectively. The viscosity of the jet liquid is varied by using different silicone oils (SO3, SO5,
and SO20 are pure liquids supplied by Carl Roth GmbH, Germany). SO1 is a mixture of SO3 and SO0.65 (supplied
by IMCD South East Europe GmbH, Austria) with a mass ratio of 70%:30%. In addition, the drop liquid is dyed
with Indigotin 85 (E 132, BASF, Germany) at a concentration of 1g/l. The dye is added to the aqueous glycerol
solutions before the liquid properties are measured.
TABLE I. Liquid properties. All measurements were carried out at an ambient temperature of Tamb = 23 ±1C
Abbreviation Density Dynamic viscosity Surface tension Ohnesorge number
ρ(kg ·m3)µ(mP a ·s)σ(mN ·m1)Oh()
G1 1024±5 1.33±0.05 70±1 0.011±0.001
G5 1118±5 5.05±0.10 68±2 0.041±0.004
G20 1169±5 17.14±0.05 67.5±1 0.137±0.007
SO1 846±5 1.45±0.03 17±1 0.023±0.001
SO3 887±5 2.73±0.05 18.5±0.5 0.034±0.001
SO5 915±10 5.10±0.05 19.5±0.5 0.071±0.004
SO20 949±5 19.15±0.05 20.5±0.5 0.263±0.002
III. RESULTS: REGIME MAPS
The first set of experiments using G5 as the drop liquid and SO5 as the jet liquid is defined as the reference case
with a viscosity ratio of λ=µdj1. It establishes the starting point for investigating viscosity effects. The results
4
FIG. 2. (a) Collision outcomes of the reference case G5/SO5 classified in the form of a regime map with W edand Lj/Djas the
scaling parameters. (b) Recorded collision pictures (front view - camera 2) of the structures produced by drop-jet collisions.
A, B, C and D correspond to the data marked in red in (a). (c) Schematic illustration of the structures. Adapted from [50].
are represented in figure 2(a) in the form of a regime map, similar to the ones already introduced in [44] and [50].
Collision pictures recorded in front view (camera 2) are shown in figure 2(b). For clarity, a schematic illustration is
added in figure 2(c). Further details about the observed regimes and the reference case can be found in [50]. For
consistency, we briefly recall the four regimes:
(A) drops-in-jet: The drops are totally engulfed by the jet, which remains continuous. This regime is marked
with filled, but differently coloured circles in all regime maps.
(B) fragmented drops-in-jet: In this case, the drops fragment, but the jet remains continuous. Often all drop
fragments remain inside the continuous jet, but sometimes parts of them may be expelled. This regime is marked
with black empty triangles.
(C) encapsulated drops: The droplets do not fragment, but the jet breaks up. The result is a regular stream of
droplets, which are encapsulated with the jet liquid. This regime is marked with black empty diamonds.
(D) mixed fragmentation: Here, both the drops and the jet fragment. This regime is marked with black crosses.
The regime maps used for the classification of the collision outcomes is based on two scaling parameters. The first
scaling parameter Lj/Dj, a purely geometric one, is used to predict the jet break-up. The fragmentation mechanism
can be primarily attributed to a capillary-driven instability, similar to the one of Plateau Rayleigh [44]. The geometric
term Ljdescribes the distance between two consecutive impacting droplets (see figure 1(b)), which is normalized by
the diameter of the jet Dj. By exceeding a critical value of Lj/Dj, the jet breaks into a regular stream of encapsulated
droplets [44, 50, 55, 56]. The critical value of the reference case G5/SO5 is approximately 2, as indicated by the solid
line in figure 2(a). Note that our previous study [50] associates the transition between drops-in-jet and encapsulated
drops to a unique critical value of Lj/Dj, whereas the present work reveals a moderate influence of inertia on this
critical value. Several reasons can explain the slight deviations observed in the data. First and most likely, the
摘要:

PACSnumbers:E ectsofviscosityonliquidstructuresproducedbyin-airmicrouidicsDavidBaumgartner,GunterBrenn,andCarolePlanchetteInstituteofFluidMechanicsandHeatTransfer,GrazUniversityofTechnology,A-8010Graz,Austria(Dated:October11,2022)Thisstudyexperimentallyinvestigatesthee ectofviscosityontheoutcomeso...

展开>> 收起<<
PACS numbers Eects of viscosity on liquid structures produced by in-air microuidics David BaumgartnerG unter Brenn and Carole Planchette.pdf

共16页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:16 页 大小:4.73MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-06

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 16
客服
关注