Islam, Abdel-Aty, Goswamy and Abdelraouf
3
INTRODUCTION
Traffic analysis from a safety point of view has largely relied on crash data. Various statistical
methods and machine learning methods have been implemented to understand proactive natures of crash
enabling real time prediction of these events. Countermeasures have been developed based on accident data
as well. However, crash data can be rare events and thereare notable shortcomings of these types of data
such as incorrect reasoning, subjectivism, inaccurate data, etc. (1, 2). Moreover, the specific reasoning to a
crash can often be factors other than roadway characteristics and traffic features which cannot be modelled
using the prediction algorithms in the literature. On the other hand, conflict events are more common and
therefore, can help better to understand design flaws of roadway as well as traffic conditions that impacts
conflicts. Several previous studies have definitively proven conflict analysis as an alternative to crash
analysis with similar results (2-5). Several metrics has thus been developed to measure conflict such as
Time-to-collision (TTC) (6), time exposed TTC (TET), time integrated TTC (TIT), time-to-lane crossing
(TLC) (7), Post encroach time (PET), gap time (GT), encoding time (ET), and time advantage (TAdv) (8),
etc. The surrogate safety measures are usually dependent on exact localization of road users. For
example, to calculate TTC, initial location and velocity would be needed. This requires precise GPS
locations. An effective way to study an intersection would be with the help of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
(UAV) that can be then used to extract accurate trajectories at the centimeter level. These are a better
alternative than roadside cameras which have distortion of localization at camera edges. UAVs are also
known for easy maneuvering, flexibility, and low cost. UAVs have become an emerging video analysis
solution at the transportation level in the recent years. It is often augmented with radar and infrared cameras
that can provide a bird’s eye view of an intersection including the approaches. In this study, an intersection
was analyed with respect to PET from the data available through UAV. The signal timing at that instant
was also captured. The purpose of this study was to analyze the interaction of safety events and relate it to
the signal states.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Traffic safety at intersections has been shown to be dependent on signal timing at that intersection. For
example, altering signal phases can better or worsen intersection safety (9). Several studies have found that
there is a direct relation between signal timings and crashes. After any retiming of signals, a crash reduction
factor is also estimated but few studies have also reported that there were no significant relationships (10).
Guo, Wang (11) showed that adaptive intersections experienced fewer crashes than isolate ones. The study
was extensive and included over 170 intersections in Florida, USA but the results were based on signal
timing sheets only since real traffic data was not available. Midenet, Saunier (12) evaluated signal safety
by measuring the exposure to lateral collisions using video feed. Approach level data from traffic detectors
including speed, volume was found to be associated with significant crash risk (13). It was also reported in
this study that longer green time for left turn, higher green ratio can improve the safety at intersections. The
main limitation of all the studies is that crash events are usually rare and therefore, these studies would only
rely on the spatial relationship between crash events and traffic parameters. It has been shown in several
studies that the temporal relationship need to be included as well since traffic parameters and signal timing
would vary largely throughout the day and even across days (14-16). Moreover, there are notable
shortcomings of these types of police reported crash data such as incorrect reasoning, subjectivism,
inaccurate data, etc. (1, 2). Additionally, there is the moral dilemma of waiting for fatalities to happen
before taking an appropriate countermeasure making it a reactive approach. Crash events are also rare, and
it takes a long time to study a location or conduct a before-after study. Surrogate safety measures provide
an alternate and proactive methodology that does not require much time and solves the moral dilemma to a
great extent. Several studies have also shown that it can significantly correlate to crashes and can mostly
be used as an alternative (2-5, 17).
Using surrogate safety measures for signal timing was first proposed by Stevanovic, Stevanovic
(18). The study proposed the integration of optimization and surrogate safety measure assessment at the
microscopic level considering both the safety and efficiency. Network wide optimization was also studied